| Literature DB >> 27832663 |
Cong Wang1, Wenxue Zhang2, Lin Zhang3, Xuan Chen1, Fang Liu4, Jing Zhang5, Shanghui Guan1, Yi Sun1, Pengxiang Chen1, Ding Wang6, Effat Un Nesa1, Yufeng Cheng1, George M Yousef7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our previous study found that dysregulated microRNA-146a-5p (miR-146a-5p) is involved in oesophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) proliferation. This article aimed to evaluate its detailed mechanisms in ESCC epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) progression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27832663 PMCID: PMC5155362 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1) The relative expression levels of miR-146a-5p after transfection. (B, C) The effects of miR-146a-5p mimics and inhibitor on invasion ability of ESCC. (D, E) miR-146a-5p mimics and inhibitor led to the changes of EMT markers' expression. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 2The prediction and validation of ) Notch2 exhibits miR-146a-5p-binding sequences in its 3′-UTR regions. (B) Luciferase assays validated that Notch2 is a target of miR-146a-5p. (C, D) Further evidence of miR-146a-5p targeting Notch2 by western blotting. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 3) shRNA transfection of Notch2 could inhibit its expression. (B, C) shRNA-Notch2 inhibited invasion ability of ESCC. (D, E) shRNA-Notch2 regulated EMT markers of ESCC. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 4The , B) miR-146a-5p inhibitor caused an increase in ESCC cells' invasive ability, whereas shRNA-Notch2 could abolish this change. (C, D) miR-146a-5p inhibitor led to increase of Snail and Vimentin and decrease of E-cadherin, whereas co-transfection with shRNA-Notch2 partially abolished these changes. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.