Literature DB >> 27832564

Defining a reference range for vital signs in healthy term pregnant women undergoing caesarean section.

A Dennis1, L Hardy2.   

Abstract

Early warning systems (EWS), used to identify deteriorating hospitalised patients, are based on measurement of vital signs. When the patients are pregnant, most EWS still use non-pregnant reference ranges of vital signs to determine trigger thresholds. There are no published reference ranges for all vital signs in pregnancy. We aimed to define vital signs reference ranges for term pregnancy in the preoperative period, and to determine the appropriateness of EWS trigger criteria in pregnancy. We conducted a one-year retrospective study in a tertiary referral obstetric hospital. The study sample was healthy term women undergoing planned caesarean section (CS). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2) and temperature were all measured automatically and data was extracted from the medical record. Two hundred and fifty-eight women met inclusion criteria. Results were (mean ± SD [standard deviation]) SBP 118 ± 11.2 mmHg, DBP 75 ± 10.3 mmHg, HR 84 ± 10.2 /minute, respiratory rate 18 ± 1.5 /minute, SpO2 99%  ± 1.0% and temperature 36.4°C ± 0.43°C. The reference ranges (mean ± 2SD) determined were SBP 96-140 mmHg, DBP 54-96 mmHg, HR 64-104/minute, RR 15-21 /minute, SpO2 97%-100% and temperature 35.5°C-37.3°C. This study defined a reference range for vital signs in healthy term pregnant women undergoing CS. Study findings suggest that currently used criteria for EWS triggers, based on non-pregnant values, may be too extreme for timely detection of deteriorating pregnant patients. Further research examining the modified HR triggers of ≤50 and ≥110 /minute in pregnant women and their relationship to clinical outcomes is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  vital signs, pregnancy, reference range

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27832564     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1604400619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  3 in total

Review 1.  Improving assessment of acute obstetric patients - introducing a Swedish obstetric triage system.

Authors:  Linnéa Lindroos; Radha Korsoski; Marie Ordéus Öhman; Helen Elden; Ove Karlsson; Verena Sengpiel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Does wearing double surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic reduce maternal oxygen saturation in term pregnant women?: A prospective study.

Authors:  Mehmet Murat Isikalan; Buşra Özkaya; Eren Berkay Özkaya; Meryem Gümüş; Enes Ferlibaş; Ali Acar
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 3.  Escalation triggers and expected responses in obstetric early warning systems used in UK consultant-led maternity units.

Authors:  James Cheshire; David Lissauer; Will Parry-Smith; Aurelio Tobias; Gary B Smith; Richard Isaacs; Vanora Hundley
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-12-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.