| Literature DB >> 27832346 |
Rhian M Guillem1,2, Falko P Drijfhout3, Stephen J Martin4.
Abstract
Recognition is a fundamental process on which all subsequent behaviors are based at every organizational level, from the gene up to the super-organism. At the whole organism level, visual recognition is the best understood. However, chemical communication is far more widespread than visual communication, but despite its importance is much less understood. Ants provide an excellent model system for chemical ecology studies as it is well established that compounds known as cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) are used as recognition cues in ants. Therefore, stable species-specific odors should exist, irrespective of geographic locality. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the CHC profiles of workers of twelve species of Myrmica ants from four countries across Europe, from Iberia to the Balkans and from the Mediterranean to Fennoscandia. CHCs remained qualitatively stable within each species, right down to the isomer level. Despite the morphological similarity that occurs within the genus Myrmica, their CHCs were highly diverse but remarkably species-specific and stable across wide geographical areas. This indicates a genetic mechanism under strong selection that produces these species-specific chemical profiles, despite each species encountering different environmental conditions across its range.Entities:
Keywords: Chemical recognition; Chemotaxonomy; Cuticular hydrocarbons; Myrmica
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27832346 PMCID: PMC5119849 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-016-0784-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chem Ecol ISSN: 0098-0331 Impact factor: 2.626
Fig. 1Geographic localities of the 12 Myrmica species collected from Great Britain, Spain, Finland, and Greece. See Online Resource 1 for locality details. rub = M. rubra; rug = M. ruginodis; sab = M. sabuleti; scab = M. scabrinodis; sch = M. schencki; alo = M. aloba; lob = M. lobicornis; lobu = M. lobulicornis; spec = M. specioides; sulc = M. sulcinodis; van = M. vandeli; wes = M. wesmaeli. Species in bold were used in a more detailed statistical analysis
Myrmica species, habitat type and number of colonies analyzed from each country
| Species | Country | No. sites | No. colonies | Habitat | Total no. colonies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Spain | 1 | 5 | Dense & moist riverine forest. | 5 |
|
| Finland | 1 | 3 | Coniferous forest with ground moss. | 3 |
|
| Spain | 3 | 5 | Alpine meadow above 1500 m. | 5 |
|
| Greece | 1 | 2 | Alder carr next to stream. | 26 |
| Finland | 5 | 11 | Grassy fields, grass verges, inland sand dunes. | ||
| Spain | 4 | 10 | Grazed fields, grassy verges, alpine meadow with stream, riverine edges. | ||
| UK | 1 | 3 | Grassy fields. | ||
|
| Greece | 1 | 4 | Mountainous wet glade. | 26 |
| Finland | 6 | 7 | Coniferous forest, grassy fields, sphagnum bog. | ||
| Spain | 10 | 10 | Alpine meadow, glade, open pine woodland, wet meadow. | ||
| UK | 4 | 5 | Upland and lowland moor, limestone quarry. | ||
|
| Greece | 6 | 18 | Rocky alpine slope, deciduous woodland edges, wet glade. | 48 |
| Spain | 10 | 18 | Alpine meadow, forest glades, mixed forest, wet meadow. | ||
| UK | 4 | 12* | Lowland moor, grassy fields, coastal sand dunes, limestone quarry. | ||
|
| Finland | 9 | 25 | Open pine forest, coastal grass margins, grassy fields, sphagnum bog. | 63 |
| Spain | 13 | 20 | Alpine meadow, forest glade, open pine forest, riverside mosaic. | ||
| UK | 7 | 18* | Grassy fields, upland & lowland moor, limestone quarry, coastal sand dunes | ||
|
| Finland | 4 | 8 | Open pine forest, coastal grass margins, open coniferous forest. | 24 |
| Spain | 7 | 11 | Grassy dry meadows, stony open Mediterranean scrub. | ||
| UK | 1 | 5 | Coastal sand dunes. | ||
|
| Spain | 8 | 8 | Mosaic of meadow and woodland, dry sun exposed stony slopes, grazed alpine meadows. | 8 |
|
| Spain | 2 | 5 | Alpine meadows above 2000 m. | 5 |
|
| Spain | 1 | 1 | Alpine meadow with boggy areas, 1800 m. | 1 |
|
| Spain | 4 | 5 | Alpine meadow with boggy areas, forest glades, 1200-1800 m. | 5 |
*Data used from Guillem et al. (2012). Number of colonies represent the total number of nests chemo-typed. Species in bold were used in a detailed NMDS analysis
Fig. 2Cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles of the 12 Myrmica species. Chromatograms were aligned to each other using the n- alkanes. A simple cladogram of the 12 species is shown on the left to demonstrate genetic relatedness (based on Jansen et al. 2010). Observe how the chain lengths of the profiles shift with M. sabuleti and M. scabrinodis at the lower end (C23-C29), and M. ruginodis and M. schencki at the higher end (C27-C39), in addition to the different compounds represented by different peaks. CHC profiles shown are from Spanish populations other than M. lobicornis which is from Finland
Fig. 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination (NMDS) plot of the transformed relative proportions of compounds for 12 species of Myrmica based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distances. STRESS = 0.075. alo = M. aloba (N = 5); lob = M. lobicornis (N = 3); lobu = M. lobulicornis (N = 5); spe = M. specioides (N = 8); sul = M. sulcinodis (N = 5); van = M. vandeli (N = 1); wes = M. wesmaeli (N = 5); rub = M. rubra (N = 26); rug = M. ruginodis (N = 26); sab = M. sabuleti (N = 48); scab = M. scabrinodis (N = 63); sch = M. schencki (N = 24)
Fig. 4Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination (NMDS) plot of the transformed relative proportions of compounds for five species of Myrmica based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distances. STRESS = 0.0402. rub = M. rubra (N = 26); rug = M. ruginodis (N = 26); sab = M. sabuleti (N = 48); scab = M. scabrinodis (N = 63); sch = M. schencki (N = 24)
Fig. 5Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination (NMDS) plot based on binary data of presence/absence of compounds for five species of Myrmica based on Jaccard distance. STRESS = 0.054. rub = M. rubra (N = 26); rug = M. ruginodis (N = 26); sab = M. sabuleti (N = 48); scab = M. scabrinodis (N = 63); sch = M. schencki (N = 24)
Proportion (%) of hydrocarbon classes present in Myrmica spp. (scab = M. scabrinodis; sab = M. sabuleti; sch = M. schencki; rub = M. rubra; rug = M. ruginodis; alo = M. aloba; spe = M. specioides; lob = M. lobicornis; lobu = M. lobulicornis; wes = M. wesmaeli; sul = M. sulcinodis; van = M. vandeli
| scab | sab | sch | rub | rug | alo | spe | lob | lobu | wes | sul | van | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mono-methyl alkanes | 15.6 | 24.8 | 31.1 | 44.8 | 28.9 | 20.1 | 13.9 | 8.5 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 51.8 | 23.3 |
| di-methyl alkanes | 0.2 | 0.4 | 52.2 | 37.4 | 28.7 | 0 | 6.9 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 23.2 | 0 |
| tri-methyl alkanes | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 7.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0 |
| tetra-methyl alkanes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| n-alkanes | 10.9 | 9.3 | 8.9 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 15.1 | 13.6 | 3.4 | 12.7 | 4.4 | 13.2 | 17.8 |
| alkenes | 54.2 | 63.5 | 0 | 1.4 | 13.3 | 0 | 28.2 | 27.2 | 79.8 | 31.8 | 2.6 | 37.7 |
| dienes | 18.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.8 | 59.6 | 36.9 | 62.4 | 0 | 54.3 | 0 | 0 |
| mono-methyl alkenes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| mono-methyl dienes | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.8 |
| unknown | 0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 | 5.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 2.0 |