Literature DB >> 27832345

Olfactory Cues, Visual Cues, and Semiochemical Diversity Interact During Host Location by Invasive Forest Beetles.

Jessica L Kerr1,2, Dave Kelly2, Martin K-F Bader3, Eckehard G Brockerhoff4,5.   

Abstract

Plant-feeding insects use visual and olfactory cues (shape, color, plant volatiles) for host location, but the relative importance of different cues and interactions with non-host-plant volatiles in ecosystems of varying plant biodiversity is unclear for most species. We studied invasive bark beetles and wood borers associated with pine trees to characterize interactions among color, host and non-host volatiles, by employing traps that mimic tree trunks. Cross-vane flight intercept traps (black, green, red, white, yellow, clear) and black funnel traps were used with and without attractants (α-pinene + ethanol), repellents (non-host green leaf volatiles, 'GLV'), and attractant/repellent combinations in four pine forests in New Zealand. We trapped 274,594 Hylurgus ligniperda, 7842 Hylastes ater, and 16,301 Arhopalus ferus. Trap color, attractant, and color × attractant effects were highly significant. Overall, black and red traps had the highest catches, irrespective of the presence of attractants. Alpha-pinene plus ethanol increased trap catch of H. ligniperda 200-fold but only 6-fold for H. ater and 2-fold for A. ferus. Green leaf volatiles had a substantial repellent effect on trap catch of H. ligniperda but less on H. ater and A. ferus. Attack by H. ligniperda was halved when logs were treated with GLV, and a similar effect was observed when logs were placed among broadleaved understory shrubs emitting GLV. Overall, H. ligniperda was most strongly affected by the olfactory cues used, whereas H. ater and A. ferus were more strongly affected by visual cues. Collectively, the results support the semiochemical diversity hypothesis, indicating that non-host plant volatiles from diverse plant communities or artificial dispensers can contribute to resistance against herbivores by partly disrupting host location.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attractant; Cerambycidae; Curculionidae; Pinus; Repellent; Scolytinae

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27832345     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-016-0792-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  22 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of color vision in insects.

Authors:  A D Briscoe; L Chittka
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Interactions among Scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers.

Authors:  T D Paine; K F Raffa; T C Harrington
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Predicting how altering propagule pressure changes establishment rates of biological invaders across species pools.

Authors:  Eckehard G Brockerhoff; Mark Kimberley; Andrew M Liebhold; Robert A Haack; Joseph F Cavey
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Ethanol and (-)-alpha-pinene: attractant kairomones for some large wood-boring beetles in southeastern USA.

Authors:  Daniel R Miller
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Species-energy theory, pulsed resources, and regulation of avian richness during a mountain pine beetle outbreak.

Authors:  Mark C Drever; Jacob R Goheen; Kathy Martin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Avoidance of nonhost plants by a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in a forest of odors.

Authors:  John A Byers; Qing-He Zhang; Göran Birgersson
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-04-08

7.  Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol.

Authors:  L M Schroeder; A Lindelöw
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 8.  Biosynthesis of plant volatiles: nature's diversity and ingenuity.

Authors:  Eran Pichersky; Joseph P Noel; Natalia Dudareva
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Push-pull farming systems.

Authors:  John A Pickett; Christine M Woodcock; Charles A O Midega; Zeyaur R Khan
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 9.740

10.  An experimental test of insect-mediated colonisation of damaged Pinus radiata trees by sapstain fungi.

Authors:  James K McCarthy; Eckehard G Brockerhoff; Raphael K Didham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Predicting forest insect flight activity: A Bayesian network approach.

Authors:  Stephen M Pawson; Bruce G Marcot; Owen G Woodberry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effects of Color Attributes on Trap Capture Rates of Chrysobothris femorata (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and Related Species.

Authors:  Cynthia L Perkovich; Karla M Addesso; Joshua P Basham; Donna C Fare; Nadeer N Youssef; Jason B Oliver
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.387

Review 3.  Role of Genes in Regulating Host Plants Expansion in Tephritid Fruit Flies (Diptera) and Potential for RNAi-Based Control.

Authors:  Wei Shi; Hui Ye; George Roderick; Jun Cao; Carole Kerdelhué; Peng Han
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.066

4.  The Effect of Trap Color on Catches of Monochamus galloprovincialis and Three Most Numerous Non-Target Insect Species.

Authors:  Lidia Sukovata; Aleksander Dziuk; Radosław Plewa; Tomasz Jaworski
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.769

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.