Literature DB >> 27832005

Older Individuals Meeting Medicare Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria in Noise but Not in Quiet: Are These Patients Improved by Surgery?

Jordan A Mudery1, Ross Francis, Hilary McCrary, Abraham Jacob.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate postoperative hearing outcomes in older patients who qualified for cochlear implant (CI) by Medicare criteria using AZBio sentence tests performed in noise but not in quiet. STUDY
DESIGN: Review of patient records.
SETTING: University-based otology/neurotology practice. PATIENTS: The senior author performed 136 CI between January 2013 and September 2015. Starting in 2013, CI candidacy evaluation included AZBio sentence tests performed in quiet and noise. For the current study, older patients with preoperative AZBio scores greater than 40% in quiet but less than 40% in noise (+10 or +5 dB signal to noise ratio [SNR]) and follow up >/=6 months were included. INTERVENTION(S): Cochlear implantation in one ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pre- versus postoperative AZBio sentence test scores.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients with an average age of 73 years (range, 59-91) met inclusion criteria. Preoperative AZBio scores for the implanted ear averaged 47% points in quiet and 9% points in noise (+10 or +5 dB SNR). Preoperative bilateral AZBio scores averaged 70% points in quiet and 24% points in noise (+10 or +5 dB SNR). Postoperative AZBio scores for the implanted ear improved an average of 71% points in quiet and 51% points in noise. Postoperative bilateral hearing improved 23% points in quiet and 27% points in noise.
CONCLUSION: All patients undergoing CI candidacy testing should be tested in both quiet and noise conditions. For those who qualify only in noise, our results demonstrate that cochlear implantation typically improves hearing both in quiet and noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27832005     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Robert J Yawn; Ashley M Nassiri; Robert T Dwyer; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The Effectiveness of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Performance-Based and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Finnish Recipients.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Antje Heinrich; Timo Törmäkangas; Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Petrus Miettinen; Tytti Willberg; Pia H Linder
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Audiology Practices in the Preoperative Evaluation and Management of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates.

Authors:  Sandra Prentiss; Hillary Snapp; Teresa Zwolan
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Speech Recognition in Noise for Adults With Normal Hearing: Age-Normative Performance for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Laura M Levin; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Do Patients Benefit From a Cochlear Implant When They Qualify Only in the Presence of Background Noise?

Authors:  Emily M H Lundberg; Darcy Strong; Melinda Anderson; Alexander M Kaizer; Samuel Gubbels
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  Current Profile of Adults Presenting for Preoperative Cochlear Implant Evaluation.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Susan M Reynolds; Linsey W Sunderhaus; René H Gifford
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Development of a novel screening tool for predicting Cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  Stephany J Ngombu; Christin Ray; Kara Vasil; Aaron C Moberly; Varun V Varadarajan
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-26

8.  Benefits of a Hearing Registry: Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Quiet Versus Noise in 1,611 Patients.

Authors:  Camille Dunn; Sharon E Miller; Erin C Schafer; Christopher Silva; René H Gifford; Jedidiah J Grisel
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.493

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.