| Literature DB >> 27831909 |
Jane Coad1, Alex Toft1, Susie Lapwood2, Joseph Manning3, Mark Hunter4, Huw Jenkins5, Clare Sadlier5, Julie Hammonds6, Ailsa Kennedy7, Simon Murch8, David Widdas9.
Abstract
With the growing number of children and young people with complex care needs or life-limiting conditions, alternative routes for nutrition have been established (such as gastrostomy feeding). The conditions of children and young people who require such feeding are diverse but could relate to problems with swallowing (dysphagia), digestive disorders or neurological/muscular disorders. However, the use of a blended diet as an alternative to prescribed formula feeds for children fed via a gastrostomy is a contentious issue for clinicians and researchers. From a rapid review of the literature, we identify that current evidence falls into three categories: (1) those who feel that the use of a blended diet is unsafe and substandard; (2) those who see benefits of such a diet as an alternative in particular circumstances (eg, to reduce constipation) and (3) those who see merit in the blended diet but are cautious to proclaim potential benefits due to the lack of clinical research. There may be some benefits to using blended diets, although concerns around safety, nutrition and practical issues remain. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.Entities:
Keywords: blended diet; children; enteral; gastrostomy; young people
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27831909 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Dis Child ISSN: 0003-9888 Impact factor: 3.791