Literature DB >> 27831869

A Mixed Finite Element Method to Solve the EEG Forward Problem.

J Vorwerk, C Engwer, S Pursiainen, C H Wolters.   

Abstract

Finite element methods have been shown to achieve high accuracies in numerically solving the EEG forward problem and they enable the realistic modeling of complex geometries and important conductive features such as anisotropic conductivities. To date, most of the presented approaches rely on the same underlying formulation, the continuous Galerkin (CG)-FEM. In this article, a novel approach to solve the EEG forward problem based on a mixed finite element method (Mixed-FEM) is introduced. To obtain the Mixed-FEM formulation, the electric current is introduced as an additional unknown besides the electric potential. As a consequence of this derivation, the Mixed-FEM is, by construction, current preserving, in contrast to the CG-FEM. Consequently, a higher simulation accuracy can be achieved in certain scenarios, e.g., when the diameter of thin insulating structures, such as the skull, is in the range of the mesh resolution. A theoretical derivation of the Mixed-FEM approach for EEG forward simulations is presented, and the algorithms implemented for solving the resulting equation systems are described. Subsequently, first evaluations in both sphere and realistic head models are presented, and the results are compared to previously introduced CG-FEM approaches. Additional visualizations are shown to illustrate the current preserving property of the Mixed-FEM. Based on these results, it is concluded that the newly presented Mixed-FEM can at least complement and in some scenarios even outperform the established CG-FEM approaches, which motivates a further evaluation of the Mixed-FEM for applications in bioelectromagnetism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27831869     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2624634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  6 in total

1.  A retrospective evaluation of automated optimization of deep brain stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Johannes Vorwerk; Andrea A Brock; Daria N Anderson; John D Rolston; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Boundary element fast multipole method for modeling electrical brain stimulation with voltage and current electrodes.

Authors:  Sergey N Makarov; Laleh Golestanirad; William A Wartman; Bach Thanh Nguyen; Gregory M Noetscher; Jyrki P Ahveninen; Kyoko Fujimoto; Konstantin Weise; Aapo R Nummenmaa
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Detection of Brain Network Communities During Natural Speech Comprehension From Functionally Aligned EEG Sources.

Authors:  Di Zhou; Gaoyan Zhang; Jianwu Dang; Masashi Unoki; Xin Liu
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.387

5.  The FieldTrip-SimBio pipeline for EEG forward solutions.

Authors:  Johannes Vorwerk; Robert Oostenveld; Maria Carla Piastra; Lilla Magyari; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Multimodal alterations of directed connectivity profiles in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders.

Authors:  Muthuraman Muthuraman; Vera Moliadze; Lena Boecher; Julia Siemann; Christine M Freitag; Sergiu Groppa; Michael Siniatchkin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.