Literature DB >> 27831717

It's complicated: Examining smokers' relationships with their cigarette brands.

Sarah E Johnson1, Blair N Coleman1, Carol L Schmitt2.   

Abstract

Despite increased restrictions and taxes, decreased social acceptability, and widespread awareness of the harms of tobacco use, many in the U.S. continue to smoke cigarettes. Thus, understanding smokers' attitudes and motivations remains an important goal. This study adopts the consumer psychology concept of brand relationship to provide a new lens through which to examine smokers' attitudes about their cigarette use. Twelve focus groups (N = 143) were conducted with adult cigarette smokers from September to November, 2013. Using a semistructured moderator guide and "top of mind" worksheets, the discussion examined participants' attitudes toward (a) their own cigarette brand and (b) tobacco companies in general. Data were coded and analyzed following principles of thematic analysis. Adult smokers reported positive attitudes toward their cigarette brand, as their brand was strongly associated with the positive experience of smoking (e.g., satisfying craving and relief from withdrawal). In contrast, thinking about tobacco companies in general evoked negative reactions, revealing overwhelmingly negative attitudes toward the industry. Findings reveal a complicated relationship between smokers and their cigarette brand: simultaneously embracing their cigarettes and rejecting the industry that makes them. Taken together, these data suggest smokers maintain largely positive brand relationships, diverting negative feelings about smoking toward the tobacco industry. Finally, they highlight the synergy between branding and the subjective smoking experience, whereby positive brand attitudes are reinforced through withdrawal relief. Ultimately, this information could inform a more complete understanding of how smokers interpret and respond to tobacco communications, including marketing from their brand. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27831717      PMCID: PMC5702884          DOI: 10.1037/adb0000225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  22 in total

1.  Effect of the first federally funded US antismoking national media campaign.

Authors:  Tim McAfee; Kevin C Davis; Robert L Alexander; Terry F Pechacek; Rebecca Bunnell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence.

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; Kevin C Davis; M Lyndon Haviland; Peter Messeri; Cheryl G Healton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Fong; David Hammond; Fritz L Laux; Mark P Zanna; K Michael Cummings; Ron Borland; Hana Ross
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  How do I feel about the behavior? The interplay of affective associations with behaviors and cognitive beliefs as influences on physical activity behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Amy M Voss-Humke; April L Seifert
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Sustaining 'truth': changes in youth tobacco attitudes and smoking intentions after 3 years of a national antismoking campaign.

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; Kevin C Davis; Jennifer Duke; Peter Messeri
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2008-01-17

6.  Influence of branding on preference-based decision making.

Authors:  Marios G Philiastides; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-21

7.  Brands as Intentional Agents Framework: How Perceived Intentions and Ability Can Map Brand Perception.

Authors:  Nicolas Kervyn; Susan T Fiske; Chris Malone
Journal:  J Consum Psychol       Date:  2012-04

8.  Trends in Quit Attempts Among Adult Cigarette Smokers - United States, 2001-2013.

Authors:  S René Lavinghouze; Ann Malarcher; Amal Jama; Linda Neff; Karen Debrot; Laura Whalen
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Tobacco denormalization and industry beliefs among smokers from four countries.

Authors:  David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Mark P Zanna; James F Thrasher; Ron Borland
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Prediction of lapse from associations between smoking and situational antecedents assessed by ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Saul Shiffman; Mark H Balabanis; Chad J Gwaltney; Jean A Paty; Maryann Gnys; Jon D Kassel; Mary Hickcox; Stephanie M Paton
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 4.492

View more
  5 in total

1.  Associations Between Exposure and Receptivity to Branded Cigarette Advertising and Subsequent Brand Preference Among US Young Adults.

Authors:  Meghan Bridgid Moran; Samir Soneji; Andy S L Tan; Kelvin Choi
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Role of affective reactivity induced by cigarette packaging including graphic warning labels: the CASA Study.

Authors:  Matthew Stone; David Strong; Claudiu Dimofte; Elizabeth Brighton; Jesica Oratowski; Tingyi Yang; Manar Alkuzweny; Atean Asslani; Katherine Velasco; Michael Skipworth; Noe C Crespo; Samantha Hurst; Eric C Leas; Kim Pulvers; John P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Real-world exposure to graphic warning labels on cigarette packages in US smokers: The CASA randomized trial protocol.

Authors:  John P Pierce; David R Strong; Matthew D Stone; Adriana Villaseñor; Claudiu V Dimofte; Eric C Leas; Jesica Oratowski; Elizabeth Brighton; Samantha Hurst; Kimberley Pulvers; Sheila Kealey; Ruifeng Chen; Karen Messer
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Cigarette Brand Use and Sexual Orientation: Intersections With Gender and Race or Ethnicity.

Authors:  Alexandra Budenz; Rachel Grana
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  The effect of cigarette modified risk claims and brand on perceived risk, product appeal, and use intentions.

Authors:  Erin Keely O'Brien; Andrea L Ruybal; Amber R Koblitz; Sarah E Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.