Literature DB >> 27830645

Thoughts about Dying in America: Enhancing the impact of one's life journey and legacy by also planning for the end of life.

Philip A Pizzo1,2,3.   

Abstract

This Perspective offers a summary of the recommendations in the Institute of Medicine report Dying in America How we die is a deeply personal issue that each of us will face. However, the approach to end-of-life (EOL) care in the United States needs improvement. Too frequently, healthcare delivery is uncoordinated and has many providers who are not adequately prepared to have meaningful conversations about EOL planning. This is amplified by payment systems and policies that create impediments, misunderstanding, and sometimes misinformation. Dying in America made five recommendations to improve quality and honor individual preferences near the EOL beginning with making conversations with providers and families something that occurs during various phases of the life cycle and not just when one is facing serious illness or possible EOL. It was recommended (i) that public and private payers and care delivery organizations cover the provision of comprehensive care that is accessible and available to individuals on a 24/7 schedule; (ii) that professional societies and other entities establish standards for clinician patient communication and advance care planning and that payers and care delivery organizations adopt them; (iii) that educational institutions, credentialing bodies, accrediting boards, state regulatory agencies, and care delivery organizations establish palliative care training, certification, and/or licensure requirements; (iv) that public and private payers and care delivery organizations integrate the financing of health and social services; and (v) that public and private organizations should engage their constituents and provide fact-based information to encourage advance care planning and informed choice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOL; death and dying; end of life; palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27830645      PMCID: PMC5135318          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614266113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others?

Authors:  Joseph J Gallo; Joseph B Straton; Michael J Klag; Lucy A Meoni; Daniel P Sulmasy; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  The Doctor: for life and at the end of life.

Authors:  Philip A Pizzo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Should we practice what we profess? Care near the end of life.

Authors:  Philip A Pizzo; David M Walker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Do unto others: doctors' personal end-of-life resuscitation preferences and their attitudes toward advance directives.

Authors:  Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Eric Neri; Ann Fong; Helena Kraemer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  The contribution of a MOOC to community discussions around death and dying.

Authors:  Jennifer Tieman; Lauren Miller-Lewis; Deb Rawlings; Deborah Parker; Christine Sanderson
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.234

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.