Literature DB >> 27830430

Evolution of male rectal prolapse surgery and initial experience of robotic rectopexy in men.

Arifa Siddika1, Sunita Saha2, Shahab Siddiqi2.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) has proven benefit in the treatment of external rectal prolapse and symptomatic internal rectal prolapse in women. However, there is a recurrence rate of 4-50% depending on indication. Some of this recurrence is attributable to persistent lateral and posterior prolapses. Modifications of LVMR (modified Orr-Loygue rectopexies) describe an additional narrow posterior rectal mesh fixed to the mesorectal fat, which is inherently insecure. Additional complications in men include sexual dysfunction caused by nerve damage from the ventral rectal dissection. There is one case series in men, published by a surgeon with an unusually large practice, showing LVMR to have a good success rate with low rates of sexual dysfunction. Other series have contained small numbers of men, but subgroup analysis to determine success and complication rates is not possible. Robotic surgery is more precise than laparoscopic surgery, allows stereotactic vision, and has a stable platform. We have developed a robotic modified Orr-Loygue rectopexy in an attempt to deal with the persistent components of posterior rectal prolapse by placing a mesh posteriorly through a narrow dissection and securing the mesh to the distal rectal muscle tube. Mesh-to-muscle fixation is more secure than mesh-to-mesorectal fat fixation. The robotic platform also improves the accuracy of ventral dissection and reduces the risk of sexual dysfunction in men. Our initial results indicate that robotic modified Orr-Loygue rectopexy is a safe and feasible option for rectal prolapse in men, with no more complications or recurrences than the best published outcomes for LVMR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Men; Modified; Orr–Loygue rectopexy; Rectal prolapse; Robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27830430     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0656-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  16 in total

1.  Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Authors:  S M Heah; J E Hartley; J Hurley; G S Duthie; J R Monson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Surgery for rectal prolapse: Orr-Loygue ventral rectopexy with limited dissection prevents postoperative-induced constipation without increasing recurrence.

Authors:  Guillaume Portier; Francesco Iovino; Franck Lazorthes
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults.

Authors:  William S Cobb; Justin M Burns; Kent W Kercher; Brent D Matthews; H James Norton; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Authors:  K I Deen; E Grant; C Billingham; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Report of 257 cases.

Authors:  J Loygue; B Nordlinger; O Cunci; M Malafosse; C Huguet; R Parc
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) for the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids: long-term results in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Faucheron; Gilles Poncet; David Voirin; Bogdan Badic; Yves Gangner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joshua R Karas; Selman Uranues; Donato F Altomare; Selman Sokmen; Zoran Krivokapic; Jiri Hoch; Ivan Bartha; Roberto Bergamaschi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A D'Hoore; R Cadoni; F Penninckx
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A Senapati; R G Gray; L J Middleton; J Harding; R K Hills; N C M Armitage; L Buckley; J M A Northover
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Delorme-Thiersch Operation Outcomes in Men and Women With Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Keehoon Hyun; Seo-Gue Yoon
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-31

2.  Laparoscopic posterior rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: Is it the ideal procedure for males?

Authors:  Senthil Kumar Ganapathi; Rajapandian Subbiah; Sathiyamoorthy Rudramurthy; Harish Kakkilaya; Parthasarathi Ramakrishnan; Palanivelu Chinnusamy
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

3.  Laparoscopic Posterolateral Rectopexy for the Treatment of Patients With a Full Thickness Rectal Prolapse: Experience With 63 Patients and Short-term Outcomes.

Authors:  Keehoon Hyun; Shi-Jun Yang; Ki-Yun Lim; Jong-Kyun Lee; Seo-Gue Yoon
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2018-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.