| Literature DB >> 27830190 |
Phaedra Thomas1, Jennifer Sedillo1, Jenna Oberstaller1, Suzanne Li1, Min Zhang1, Naresh Singh1, Chengqi C Q Wang1, Kenneth Udenze1, Rays H Y Jiang1, John H Adams1.
Abstract
Malaria remains one of the most devastating parasitic diseases worldwide, with 90% of the malaria deaths in Africa in 2013 attributable to Plasmodium falciparum. The clinical symptoms of malaria include cycles of fever, corresponding to parasite rupture from red blood cells every 48 h. Parasite pathways involved in the parasite's ability to survive the host fever response, and indeed, the functions of ~40% of P. falciparum genes as a whole, are still largely unknown. Here, we evaluated the potential of scalable forward-genetic screening methods to identify genes involved in the host fever response. We performed a phenotypic screen for genes linked to the parasite response to febrile temperatures by utilizing a selection of single-disruption P. falciparum mutants generated via random piggyBac transposon mutagenesis in a previous study. We identified several mutants presenting significant phenotypes in febrile response screens compared to the wild type, indicating possible roles for the disrupted genes in this process. We present these initial studies as proof that forward genetics can be used to gain insight into critical factors associated with parasite biology. IMPORTANCE Though the P. falciparum genome sequence has been available for many years, ~40% of its genes do not have informative annotations, as they show no detectable homology to those of studied organisms. More still have not been evaluated via genetic methods. Scalable forward-genetic approaches that allow interrogation of gene function without any pre-existing knowledge are needed to hasten understanding of parasite biology, which will expedite the identification of drug targets and the development of future interventions in the face of spreading resistance to existing frontline drugs. In this work, we describe a new approach to pursue forward-genetic phenotypic screens for P. falciparum to identify factors associated with virulence. Future large-scale phenotypic screens developed to probe other such interesting phenomena, when considered in parallel, will prove a powerful tool for functional annotation of the P. falciparum genome, where so much remains undiscovered.Entities:
Keywords: forward genetics; heat shock; phenotype screen; piggyBac; transposon-mediated mutagenesis; virulence factors
Year: 2016 PMID: 27830190 PMCID: PMC5082630 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00273-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
piggyBac mutants included in phenotypic screens
| Closest gene ID | Gene description | Strand | Type of insertion | Distance to gene (bp) | Clone | PCR | QIseq | WGS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PB-43 | PF3D7_0206100 | Cysteine desulfuration protein SufE | + | 3′ UTR | −293 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-9 | PF3D7_0404600 | Conserved | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-11 | PF3D7_0416500 | Repressor of RNA polymerase III transcription MAF1, putative | − | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-14 | PF3D7_0511500 | RNA pseudouridylate synthase, putative | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-17 | PF3D7_0521900 | Conserved | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-3 | PF3D7_0615900 | Conserved | − | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-125 | PF3D7_0622900 | Transcription factor with AP2 domain(s), putative (ApiAP2) | − | Intergenic | −2,407 | X | X | X | |
| PB-20 | PF3D7_0808700 | Erythrocyte membrane protein 1, PfEMP1 (VAR) | + | Intron | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-1 | PF3D7_0811300 | CCR4-associated factor 1 (CAF1) | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-54 | PF3D7_0902200 | Serine/threonine protein kinase, FIKK family (FIKK9.3) | − | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-22 | PF3D7_0931000 | Elongation factor Tu, putative | − | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-12 | PF3D7_1018300 | Conserved | − | Intergenic | −834 | X | X | X | |
| PB-25 | PF3D7_1035800 | Probable protein, unknown function (M712) | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-4 | PF3D7_1122900 | Dynein heavy chain, putative | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-19 | PF3D7_1133700 | Conserved | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-21 | PF3D7_1136000 | Conserved | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-28 | PF3D7_1138900 | ncRNA/unspecified product | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-5 | PF3D7_1141900 | Inner membrane complex protein 1b, putative (IMC1b) | − | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-33 | PF3D7_1207800 | Conserved | − | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-18 | PF3D7_1219300 | Erythrocyte membrane protein 1, PfEMP1 (VAR) | − | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-24 | PF3D7_1231800 | Asparagine-rich protein, putative | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | |
| PB-2 | PF3D7_1305500 | MAPK phosphatase 1, putative (MKP1) | + | Exon | 0 | X | X | X | X |
| PB-58 | PF3D7_1343700 | Kelch protein K13 | − | Intergenic | −1,034 | X | X | X | |
| PB-120 | PF3D7_1459500 | Conserved | + | 5′ UTR | +244 | X | X | X | |
| PB-6 | PF3D7_1475700 | Tubulin epsilon chain, putative | + | Intergenic | +908 | X | X | X |
Insertion positions were determined by QISeq. Positive distances indicate insertions upstream of the translation start site. Negative distances indicate insertions downstream of the translation stop site. Validation of mutants included limiting-dilution cloning, TAIL PCR and QIseq to verify the transposon insertion site, and WGS of select mutants to confirm that there were no other major genomic changes.
FIG 1 Heat shock assay procedure. Shown is the setup for the heat shock screen as conducted with 96-well plates. T0 plates represent the ring stage or the beginning of the experiment, T30 plates at 37°C represent the controls, and T30 plates at 41°C are the hyperthermic-temperature-treated samples. Three technical and three biological replicates were performed for each well. Fixed wells are stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) to detect RBCs and ethidium bromide (EtBr) to detect parasites via flow cytometry. Fold change was determined by using the formula shown at the bottom for each T30 41°C well, averaged across three biological replicates. R, rings; S, schizonts; uRBCs, uninfected RBCs; %S, percent schizont parasitemia; WT, wild type. See Materials and Methods for full details.
FIG 2 Heat shock response screen of piggyBac mutants. (A) P. falciparum clone NF54 and mutants (each PB ID number indicates the locus of transposon insertion; see Table 1) are shown on a graph according to normalized growth in response to febrile temperature stress compared to that of the NF54 parent line. Each mutant’s growth under heat shock was normalized to its growth at 37°C to account for inherent differences in growth. Gray bars indicate mutants with increased growth in response to heat shock compared to that of NF54, white bars indicate mutants that are not significantly different from NF54, and black bars indicate mutants with significantly decreased growth. Three technical replicates and three independent biological replicates were completed for each mutant line. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean of biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA at P < 0.05 for individual experiments. (B) Mutant fold change in growth at 41°C plotted against the mutant growth rate at 37°C (as determined by Balu et al. [11]). Mutant growth defects are weakly correlated with heat shock response phenotypes.
FIG 3 Complementation reverses the mutant heat shock phenotype. (A) Western blot assay of parasite lysate showing expression of PfMKP1 in the wild-type and complemented mutant strains but not in the mutant PB-2 strain. PfBip is shown as a loading control. (B) P. falciparum clone NF54, the complemented PB-2 mutant, and the PB-2 mutant are shown on a graph according to normalized growth in response to febrile temperature stress as in Fig. 2. The complemented PB-2 mutant displayed growth after heat shock that was restored to wild-type NF54 levels. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean of three biological replicates. Statistical significance (black bar) was determined by one-way ANOVA at P < 0.05 for individual experiments.
FIG 4 piggyBac mutant performance in a phenotypic screen. The performance of each mutant was compared with that of wild-type (WT) NF54 in growth and heat shock screens. Growth was determined as described by Balu et al. (11).