Literature DB >> 2783019

Comparative study of cemented and cementless hip prostheses in the same patient.

J Knessl1, N Gschwend, H Scheier, U Munzinger.   

Abstract

In 20 patients with bilateral total hip replacements a cementless prosthetic implantation on one side and a cemented arthroplasty on the other side were performed. The mean follow-up period was 6 years for the cementless and 7.5 years for the cemented hip. The only significant difference found was concerning pain, which was more frequent on the cementless side. Otherwise we were unable to ascertain a significant difference concerning mobility, walking capacity, complications, and patient assessment. A longer observation time will be required. Where pain relief is concerned, the cemented version will continue to be the gold standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2783019     DOI: 10.1007/BF00932313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  1 in total

Review 1.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  E W Morscher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.176

  1 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Dean Pakvis; Gijs van Hellemondt; Enrico de Visser; Wilco Jacobs; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.