Literature DB >> 27830074

Sodium channel blockade unmasked Brugada electrocardiographic pattern in a patient with complete right bundle branch block and early repolarization in the lateral leads.

Shozo Konishi1, Hitoshi Minamiguchi1, Yuji Okuyama1, Yasushi Sakata1.   

Abstract

Early repolarization syndrome (ERS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS) share many electrocardiographic and clinical features, and recently have been collectively grouped as J wave syndrome. However, the effects of sodium channel blockers on the J waves differ greatly between ERS and BrS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brugada syndrome; early repolarization; sodium channel blocker

Year:  2016        PMID: 27830074      PMCID: PMC5093164          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


Introduction

Early repolarization syndrome (ERS) and Brugada syndrome (BrS) share many electrocardiographic and clinical features, and recently have been collectively grouped as J wave syndrome 1, 2. However, the effects of sodium channel blockers on the J waves differ greatly between ERS and BrS 2. Sodium channel blocker is extremely effective for deciding the therapeutic strategy in a patient after cardiopulmonary arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) complicated by complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) and early repolarization (ER) in the lateral leads.

Case Report

A 64‐year‐old man experienced VF at home early in the morning. He was resuscitated with an automated external defibrillator and was admitted to our hospital. He had no family history of sudden cardiac death and a genetic study including for SCN5A, was negative. Echocardiogram revealed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF = 75%) without any local asynergy or valvular heart disease and cardiac MRI showed no evidence of delayed enhancement. A 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed CRBBB with ER in the lateral leads (Fig. 1A). QRS morphologies of right precordial leads (V1, V2) in third intercostal spaces were almost similar to those in fourth intercostal spaces (Fig. 1B). A drug challenge test was performed with pilsicainide, a pure sodium channel blocker (1 mg/kg body weight in 10 min), to clarify the mechanisms of the idiopathic VF. An intravenous administration of pilsicainide after 4 min, unmasked a coved‐type ST‐segment elevation in the inferior leads and spontaneous frequent premature ventricular contractions that finally resulted in VF (Fig. 2). Pharmacological intervention with pilsicainide revealed the features of BrS, a coved‐type ST‐segment elevation, and therefore, the administration of quinidine with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation was started. Early repolarization in the lateral leads disappeared after taking oral quinidine and atrial pacing at 80 ppm (Fig. 1C), and he had received no appropriate ICD shocks due to ventricular arrhythmias within 3 years after the implantation.
Figure 1

(A) A 12‐lead electrocardiogram before the administration of quinidine. Right precordial leads (V1, V2) in fourth intercostal spaces. The 12‐lead electrocardiogram shows complete right bundle branch block with early repolarization in the lateral leads. (B) A 12‐lead electrocardiogram before the administration of quinidine. Right precordial leads (V1, V2) in third intercostal spaces. QRS morphologies of right precordial leads (V1, V2) in third intercostal spaces were almost similar to those in fourth intercostal spaces. (C) A 12‐lead electrocardiogram after the administration of quinidine and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. An atrial pacing rate of 80 ppm was observed and the early repolarization in the lateral lead disappeared on the 12‐lead electrocardiogram.

Figure 2

An intravenous administration of pilsicainide (1 mg/kg body weight in 10 min) after 4 min, unmasked a coved‐type ST‐segment elevation in the inferior leads, frequent premature ventricular contractions, and finally the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation, while the early repolarization did not change in the lateral leads (→).

(A) A 12‐lead electrocardiogram before the administration of quinidine. Right precordial leads (V1, V2) in fourth intercostal spaces. The 12‐lead electrocardiogram shows complete right bundle branch block with early repolarization in the lateral leads. (B) A 12‐lead electrocardiogram before the administration of quinidine. Right precordial leads (V1, V2) in third intercostal spaces. QRS morphologies of right precordial leads (V1, V2) in third intercostal spaces were almost similar to those in fourth intercostal spaces. (C) A 12‐lead electrocardiogram after the administration of quinidine and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. An atrial pacing rate of 80 ppm was observed and the early repolarization in the lateral lead disappeared on the 12‐lead electrocardiogram. An intravenous administration of pilsicainide (1 mg/kg body weight in 10 min) after 4 min, unmasked a coved‐type ST‐segment elevation in the inferior leads, frequent premature ventricular contractions, and finally the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation, while the early repolarization did not change in the lateral leads (→).

Discussion

A high incidence of an ER pattern in the inferolateral leads has been reported in patients with idiopathic VF 3, 4, 5. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantations are recommended in patients with ERS who have survived a cardiac arrest, however, the medical therapy for ERS is still challenging 6, and on the other hand, quinidine is effective for preventing recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in BrS 7. Early repolarization syndrome and BrS share many characteristics including an adult onset, male preponderance, cardiac events at rest or during sleep, and rare ventricular arrhythmias during Holter ECG monitoring, and have now been collectively grouped as J wave syndrome; however, the effects of a sodium channel blockade on the J waves differ greatly between ERS and BrS 1. After an injection of a sodium channel blocker, the J waves in BrS become more prominent, while those in ERS either do not change or become attenuated. The Brugada Consensus Report proposed that a sodium channel blockade is required to diagnose BrS in the absence of a coved‐type ST‐segment elevation 2. Moreover, some reports have demonstrated that the J waves in BrS are concealed by CRBBB 8, 9. In this case, the 12‐lead ECG also exhibited CRBBB, which masked the typical coved‐type ST‐segment elevation. Therefore, the intravenous administration of a sodium channel blockade was extremely useful for clarifying the underlying disease of the idiopathic VF and quinidine with high‐rate atrial pacing was able to prevent any VF recurrence with the disappearance of the ER in the lateral leads for 3 years.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.
  9 in total

1.  High-degree right bundle branch block obscuring the diagnosis of Brugada electrocardiographic pattern.

Authors:  Pablo A Chiale; Hugo A Garro; Pablo A Fernández; Marcelo V Elizari
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Incidence and prognostic value of early repolarization pattern in the 12-lead electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Daisuke Haruta; Kiyotaka Matsuo; Akira Tsuneto; Shinichiro Ichimaru; Ayumi Hida; Nobuko Sera; Misa Imaizumi; Eiji Nakashima; Koji Maemura; Masazumi Akahoshi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Brugada syndrome: report of the second consensus conference: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Pedro Brugada; Martin Borggrefe; Josep Brugada; Ramon Brugada; Domenico Corrado; Ihor Gussak; Herve LeMarec; Koonlawee Nademanee; Andres Ricardo Perez Riera; Wataru Shimizu; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Hanno Tan; Arthur Wilde
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The early repolarization pattern in the general population: clinical correlates and heritability.

Authors:  Peter A Noseworthy; Jani T Tikkanen; Kimmo Porthan; Lasse Oikarinen; Arto Pietilä; Kennet Harald; Gina M Peloso; Faisal M Merchant; Antti Jula; Heikki Väänänen; Shih-Jen Hwang; Christopher J O'Donnell; Veikko Salomaa; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Heikki V Huikuri
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Effect of sodium-channel blockade on early repolarization in inferior/lateral leads in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and Brugada syndrome.

Authors:  Hiro Kawata; Takashi Noda; Yuko Yamada; Hideo Okamura; Kazuhiro Satomi; Takeshi Aiba; Hiroshi Takaki; Naohiko Aihara; Mitsuaki Isobe; Shiro Kamakura; Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Electrical storm in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation is associated with early repolarization.

Authors:  Yoshifusa Aizawa; Masaomi Chinushi; Kanae Hasegawa; Nobu Naiki; Minoru Horie; Yoshiaki Kaneko; Masahiko Kurabayashi; Shogo Ito; Tsutomu Imaizumi; Yoshiyasu Aizawa; Seiji Takatsuki; Kunitake Joo; Masahito Sato; Katsuya Ebe; Yukio Hosaka; Michel Haissaguerre; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  A complete right bundle-branch block masking Brugada syndrome.

Authors:  Makoto Tomita; Hitoshi Kitazawa; Masahito Sato; Masaaki Okabe; Charles Antzelevitch; Yoshifusa Aizawa
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 1.438

8.  Acute and chronic management in patients with Brugada syndrome associated with electrical storm of ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Takeshi Ohgo; Hideo Okamura; Takashi Noda; Kazuhiro Satomi; Kazuhiro Suyama; Takashi Kurita; Naohiko Aihara; Shiro Kamakura; Tohru Ohe; Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Sudden cardiac arrest associated with early repolarization.

Authors:  Michel Haïssaguerre; Nicolas Derval; Frederic Sacher; Laurence Jesel; Isabel Deisenhofer; Luc de Roy; Jean-Luc Pasquié; Akihiko Nogami; Dominique Babuty; Sinikka Yli-Mayry; Christian De Chillou; Patrice Scanu; Philippe Mabo; Seiichiro Matsuo; Vincent Probst; Solena Le Scouarnec; Pascal Defaye; Juerg Schlaepfer; Thomas Rostock; Dominique Lacroix; Dominique Lamaison; Thomas Lavergne; Yoshifusa Aizawa; Anders Englund; Frederic Anselme; Mark O'Neill; Meleze Hocini; Kang Teng Lim; Sebastien Knecht; George D Veenhuyzen; Pierre Bordachar; Michel Chauvin; Pierre Jais; Gaelle Coureau; Genevieve Chene; George J Klein; Jacques Clémenty
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  The prognostic value of J-wave pattern for recurrence of ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Naruse; Marta de Riva; Masaya Watanabe; Adrianus P Wijnmaalen; Jeroen Venlet; Marnix Timmer; Martin J Schalij; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.976

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.