Kwok M Ho1, Norris S H Lan2. 1. Department of Intensive Care, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia; School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; School of Veterinary & Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: kwok.ho@health.wa.gov.au. 2. School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score can be used to predict mortality of patients without suspected infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using prospectively collected data within the first hour of intensive care unit admission, the predictive ability of qSOFA was compared with the Simplified Acute Physiology Score III, Admission Mortality Prediction Model III, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II model, and standard (full-version) SOFA score using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and Brier score. RESULTS: Of the 2322 patients included, 279 (12.0%) died after intensive care unit admission. The qSOFA score had a modest ability to predict mortality of all critically ill patients (AUROC, 0.672; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638-0.707; Brier score 0.099) including the noninfected patients (AUROC, 0.685; 95% CI, 0.637-0.732; Brier score 0.081). The overall predictive ability and calibration of the qSOFA was comparable to other prognostic scores. Combining qSOFA score with lactate concentrations further enhanced its predictive ability (AUROC, 0.730; 95% CI, 0.694-0.765; Brier score 0.097), comparable to the standard SOFA score. CONCLUSIONS: The qSOFA score had a modest ability to predict mortality of both septic and nonseptic patients; combining qSOFA with plasma lactate had a predictive ability comparable to the standard SOFA score.
PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score can be used to predict mortality of patients without suspected infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using prospectively collected data within the first hour of intensive care unit admission, the predictive ability of qSOFA was compared with the Simplified Acute Physiology Score III, Admission Mortality Prediction Model III, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II model, and standard (full-version) SOFA score using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and Brier score. RESULTS: Of the 2322 patients included, 279 (12.0%) died after intensive care unit admission. The qSOFA score had a modest ability to predict mortality of all critically illpatients (AUROC, 0.672; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638-0.707; Brier score 0.099) including the noninfected patients (AUROC, 0.685; 95% CI, 0.637-0.732; Brier score 0.081). The overall predictive ability and calibration of the qSOFA was comparable to other prognostic scores. Combining qSOFA score with lactate concentrations further enhanced its predictive ability (AUROC, 0.730; 95% CI, 0.694-0.765; Brier score 0.097), comparable to the standard SOFA score. CONCLUSIONS: The qSOFA score had a modest ability to predict mortality of both septic and nonseptic patients; combining qSOFA with plasma lactate had a predictive ability comparable to the standard SOFA score.
Authors: M Müller; J C Schefold; A B Leichtle; D Srivastava; G Lindner; A K Exadaktylos; C A Pfortmueller Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 0.840
Authors: Colin A Graham; Ling Yan Leung; Ronson Sze Long Lo; Chun Yu Yeung; Suet Yi Chan; Kevin Kei Ching Hung Journal: Ann Med Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 4.709
Authors: Heesu Park; Tae Gun Shin; Won Young Kim; You Hwan Jo; Yoon Jung Hwang; Sung-Hyuk Choi; Tae Ho Lim; Kap Su Han; Jonghwan Shin; Gil Joon Suh; Gu Hyun Kang; Kyung Su Kim Journal: Clin Exp Emerg Med Date: 2022-06-30
Authors: Raphael Kazidule Kayambankadzanja; Carl Otto Schell; Felix Namboya; Tamara Phiri; Grace Banda-Katha; Samson Kwazizira Mndolo; Andy Bauleni; Markus Castegren; Tim Baker Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Martin Müller; Viviane Guignard; Joerg C Schefold; Alexander B Leichtle; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Carmen A Pfortmueller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 3.240