Danielle Weinberg1, Rhoshel Lenroot2, Isabella Jacomb1, Katherine Allen2, Jason Bruggemann3, Ruth Wells3, Ryan Balzan4, Dennis Liu5, Cherrie Galletly5, Stanley V Catts6, Cynthia Shannon Weickert2, Thomas W Weickert2. 1. Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia2School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia3Schizophrenia Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia2School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia5School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 5. Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia6Adult Mental Health Services, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 6. Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia7School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Cognitively distinct subgroups of schizophrenia have been defined based on premorbid and current IQ, but little is known about the neuroanatomical differences among these cognitive subgroups. OBJECTIVES: To confirm previous findings related to IQ-based subgroups of patients with schizophrenia in an independent sample and extend those findings to determine the extent to which brain volumetric differences correspond to the IQ-based subgroups. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 183 participants were assessed at the outpatient settings of Neuroscience Research Australia and Lyell McEwin Hospital from September 22, 2009, to August 1, 2012. Patients were classified using cluster analysis on the basis of current and premorbid IQ differences. Regional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain volumes were compared among the IQ-based subgroups using analysis of covariance with intracranial volume and age as covariates. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition, scores; Wechsler Test of Adult Reading scores; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores; and MRI brain volumes. RESULTS: Ninety-six outpatients (mean [SD] age, 35.7 [8.4] years; age range, 18-51 years; 59 men) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 87 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 31.9 [8.4] years; age range, 20-50 years; 46 men) were studied. Sixty-two patients and 67 healthy controls underwent structural MRI of the brain. Cluster analyses revealed 25 putatively preserved patients (26%), 33 moderately deteriorated patients (34%), 27 severely deteriorated patients (28%), and 11 compromised patients (12%). Negative symptom scores were significantly worse in the severely deteriorated group relative to the putatively preserved group (F2,82 = 13.8, P < .001, effect size [ES] = 1.40). Patient subgroups analyzed revealed significantly reduced inferior parietal volume relative to controls (F3,113 = 9.7, P < .001, ES = 0.85-1.24). The severely deteriorated group had significantly reduced total hippocampal (mean [SEM], 8309.6 [175.0] vs 9024.0 [145.5]; P = .01), lingual gyrus (mean [SEM], 11 996.0 [531.5] vs 13 838.1 [441.9]; P = .05), and superior temporal sulcus (mean [SEM], 4697.8 [192.0] vs 5446.0 [159.6]; P = .05) gray matter volumes relative to the putatively preserved group (ES = 0.91-1.10). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using an independent sample, we obtained proportions in each IQ-based subgroup that were similar to our previous work. Inferior parietal volume reduction was characteristic of schizophrenia relative to controls, and the severely deteriorated IQ group had widespread volumetric reductions. Classifying cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia provides a platform to better characterize the neurobiological underpinnings of the illness and its treatment.
IMPORTANCE: Cognitively distinct subgroups of schizophrenia have been defined based on premorbid and current IQ, but little is known about the neuroanatomical differences among these cognitive subgroups. OBJECTIVES: To confirm previous findings related to IQ-based subgroups of patients with schizophrenia in an independent sample and extend those findings to determine the extent to which brain volumetric differences correspond to the IQ-based subgroups. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 183 participants were assessed at the outpatient settings of Neuroscience Research Australia and Lyell McEwin Hospital from September 22, 2009, to August 1, 2012. Patients were classified using cluster analysis on the basis of current and premorbid IQ differences. Regional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain volumes were compared among the IQ-based subgroups using analysis of covariance with intracranial volume and age as covariates. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, third edition, scores; Wechsler Test of Adult Reading scores; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores; and MRI brain volumes. RESULTS: Ninety-six outpatients (mean [SD] age, 35.7 [8.4] years; age range, 18-51 years; 59 men) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 87 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 31.9 [8.4] years; age range, 20-50 years; 46 men) were studied. Sixty-two patients and 67 healthy controls underwent structural MRI of the brain. Cluster analyses revealed 25 putatively preserved patients (26%), 33 moderately deteriorated patients (34%), 27 severely deteriorated patients (28%), and 11 compromised patients (12%). Negative symptom scores were significantly worse in the severely deteriorated group relative to the putatively preserved group (F2,82 = 13.8, P < .001, effect size [ES] = 1.40). Patient subgroups analyzed revealed significantly reduced inferior parietal volume relative to controls (F3,113 = 9.7, P < .001, ES = 0.85-1.24). The severely deteriorated group had significantly reduced total hippocampal (mean [SEM], 8309.6 [175.0] vs 9024.0 [145.5]; P = .01), lingual gyrus (mean [SEM], 11 996.0 [531.5] vs 13 838.1 [441.9]; P = .05), and superior temporal sulcus (mean [SEM], 4697.8 [192.0] vs 5446.0 [159.6]; P = .05) gray matter volumes relative to the putatively preserved group (ES = 0.91-1.10). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using an independent sample, we obtained proportions in each IQ-based subgroup that were similar to our previous work. Inferior parietal volume reduction was characteristic of schizophrenia relative to controls, and the severely deteriorated IQ group had widespread volumetric reductions. Classifying cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia provides a platform to better characterize the neurobiological underpinnings of the illness and its treatment.
Authors: Dag Alnæs; Tobias Kaufmann; Dennis van der Meer; Aldo Córdova-Palomera; Jaroslav Rokicki; Torgeir Moberget; Francesco Bettella; Ingrid Agartz; Deanna M Barch; Alessandro Bertolino; Christine L Brandt; Simon Cervenka; Srdjan Djurovic; Nhat Trung Doan; Sarah Eisenacher; Helena Fatouros-Bergman; Lena Flyckt; Annabella Di Giorgio; Beathe Haatveit; Erik G Jönsson; Peter Kirsch; Martina J Lund; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Giulio Pergola; Emanuel Schwarz; Olav B Smeland; Tiziana Quarto; Mathias Zink; Ole A Andreassen; Lars T Westlye Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Margo W Menkes; Kristan Armstrong; Jennifer Urbano Blackford; Stephan Heckers; Neil D Woodward Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Kristin K Lottman; David M White; Nina V Kraguljac; Meredith A Reid; Vince D Calhoun; Fabio Catao; Adrienne C Lahti Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Joost Janssen; Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja; Clara Alloza; Anouck Schippers; Lucía de Hoyos; Javier Santonja; Pedro M Gordaliza; Elizabeth E L Buimer; Neeltje E M van Haren; Wiepke Cahn; Celso Arango; René S Kahn; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; Hugo G Schnack Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Tamsyn E Van Rheenen; Vanessa Cropley; Andrew Zalesky; Chad Bousman; Ruth Wells; Jason Bruggemann; Suresh Sundram; Danielle Weinberg; Roshel K Lenroot; Avril Pereira; Cynthia Shannon Weickert; Thomas W Weickert; Christos Pantelis Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 9.306