Literature DB >> 27828820

Preventing Parastomal Hernia Using a Modified Sugarbaker Technique With Composite Mesh During Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Manuel López-Cano1, Xavier Serra-Aracil, Laura Mora, José Luis Sánchez-García, Luis Miguel Jiménez-Gómez, Marc Martí, Francesc Vallribera, Domenico Fraccalvieri, Anna Serracant, Esther Kreisler, Sebastiano Biondo, Eloy Espín, Salvador Navarro-Soto, Manuel Armengol-Carrasco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reduction in the incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) after placement of prophylactic synthetic mesh using a modified Sugarbaker technique when a permanent end-colostomy is needed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prevention of PH formation is crucial given the high prevalence of PH and difficulties in the surgical repair of PH.
METHODS: A randomized, prospective, double-blind, and controlled trial. Rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with permanent colostomy were randomized (1 : 1) to the mesh and nonmesh arms. In the mesh group, a large-pore lightweight composite mesh was placed in the intraperitoneal/onlay fashion using a modified Sugarbaker technique. PH was detected by computed tomography (CT) after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Analysis was per-protocol.
RESULTS: The mesh group included 24 patients and the control group 28. Preoperative data, surgical time, and postoperative morbidity were similar. The median follow-up was 26 months. After CT examination, 6 of 24 PHs (25%) were observed in the mesh group compared with 18 of 28 (64.3%) in the nonmesh group (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.82; P = 0.005). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in favor of the mesh group (long-rank = 4.21, P = 0.04). The number needed to treat was 2.5, which confirmed the effectiveness of the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a prosthetic mesh by the laparoscopic approach following the modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and effective in the prevention of PH, reducing significantly the incidence of PH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27828820     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

1.  Meta-analysis protocols should be prospectively registered.

Authors:  D Nepogodiev; S J Chapman; N J Smart; T D Pinkney
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after end colostomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  M López-Cano; H-T Brandsma; K Bury; B Hansson; I Kyle-Leinhase; J G Alamino; F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.

Authors:  S A Antoniou; F Agresta; J M Garcia Alamino; D Berger; F Berrevoet; H-T Brandsma; K Bury; J Conze; D Cuccurullo; U A Dietz; R H Fortelny; C Frei-Lanter; B Hansson; F Helgstrand; A Hotouras; A Jänes; L F Kroese; J R Lambrecht; I Kyle-Leinhase; M López-Cano; L Maggiori; V Mandalà; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; M Prudhomme; T Rautio; N Smart; M Śmietański; M Szczepkowski; C Stabilini; F E Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  [Prophylactic meshes in the abdominal wall. German version].

Authors:  F E Muysoms; U A Dietz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Parastomal hernia and prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation: a commentary.

Authors:  J-B Cornille; I R Daniels; N J Smart
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  [Principles and parallels of prevention and repair of parastomal hernia with meshes].

Authors:  G Köhler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  [Prophylaxis of parastomal, perineal and incisional hernias in colorectal surgery].

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Daniela Salzmann; Kilian Gloy
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  S V Patel; L Zhang; S A Chadi; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Prophylactic meshes in the abdominal wall.

Authors:  F E Muysoms; U A Dietz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Do North American colorectal surgeons use mesh to prevent parastomal hernia? A survey of current attitudes and practice

Authors:  Jessica Holland; Tyler Chesney; Fahima Dossa; Sergio Acuna; Katherine Anne Fleshner; Nancy N. Baxter
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.