Literature DB >> 2782866

Responses of lean and obese subjects to preloads, deprivation, and palatability.

T A Spiegel1, E E Shrager, E Stellar.   

Abstract

The effects of preloads, deprivation, and palatability on the eating behavior of non-dieting lean and obese subjects were studied during laboratory meals, using small solid food units (SFUs) to measure the rate of ingestion over the time-course of the meals. In both weight groups, rate of intake decreased from the beginning to the end of meals. The smaller the preloads and the longer the deprivation interval, the faster subjects ate at the beginning of meals and the higher their hunger ratings were. The longest deprivation interval also increased palatability ratings, meal length, and the total amount that subjects ate. Increasing the palatability of the food increased the rate of intake at the beginning of meals, meal length, and the amount of food that subjects ate. Obese subjects were more sensitive to palatability and less responsive to deprivation than lean subjects. For example, while lean subjects became less discriminating about the palatability of the food at the beginning of meals as deprivation increased, obese subjects did not. The satiation mechanism of obese subjects was also different from lean subjects. For example, obese subjects overate after preloads while lean subjects underate compared to their baselines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2782866     DOI: 10.1016/0195-6663(89)90026-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  13 in total

Review 1.  Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; John J Leddy; Jennifer L Temple; Myles S Faith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Non-invasive monitoring of chewing and swallowing for objective quantification of ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Edward Sazonov; Stephanie Schuckers; Paulo Lopez-Meyer; Oleksandr Makeyev; Nadezhda Sazonova; Edward L Melanson; Michael Neuman
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Brain imaging demonstrates a reduced neural impact of eating in obesity.

Authors:  Nancy Puzziferri; Jeffrey M Zigman; Binu P Thomas; Perry Mihalakos; Ryan Gallagher; Michael Lutter; Thomas Carmody; Hanzhang Lu; Carol A Tamminga
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  An Open Trial Targeting Food Cue Reactivity and Satiety Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Binge Eaters.

Authors:  Kerri N Boutelle; Stephanie Knatz; Jordan Carlson; Kristie Bergmann; Carol B Peterson
Journal:  Cogn Behav Pract       Date:  2016-10-05

5.  Effects of Peanut Processing on Masticatory Performance during Variable Appetitive States.

Authors:  Fiona McKiernan; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2009-11-19

6.  Fasting for 24 hours heightens reward from food and food-related cues.

Authors:  Jameason D Cameron; Gary S Goldfield; Graham Finlayson; John E Blundell; Eric Doucet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of aroma and taste, independently or in combination, on appetite sensation and subsequent food intake.

Authors:  Wenting Yin; Louise Hewson; Robert Linforth; Moira Taylor; Ian D Fisk
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 8.  Variety, palatability, and obesity.

Authors:  Fiona Johnson; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 9.  Factors that determine energy compensation: a systematic review of preload studies.

Authors:  Eva Almiron-Roig; Luigi Palla; Kathryn Guest; Cassandra Ricchiuti; Neil Vint; Susan A Jebb; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.110

10.  Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans.

Authors:  Laura L Wilkinson; Danielle Ferriday; Matthew L Bosworth; Nicolas Godinot; Nathalie Martin; Peter J Rogers; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.