Gastric syphilis is an uncommon extracutaneous manifestation of syphilis, occurring in less than 1% of patients, presenting nonspecific clinical manifestations. In general, it occurs on secondary stage. The critical point is the recognition of the syphilitic gastric involvement, without which there may be incorrect diagnosis of malignancy of the digestive tract. In this report, a case of secondary syphilis with gastric involvement that had complete remission with benzathine penicillin will be described.
Gastric syphilis is an uncommon extracutaneous manifestation of syphilis, occurring in less than 1% of patients, presenting nonspecific clinical manifestations. In general, it occurs on secondary stage. The critical point is the recognition of the syphilitic gastric involvement, without which there may be incorrect diagnosis of malignancy of the digestive tract. In this report, a case of secondary syphilis with gastric involvement that had complete remission with benzathine penicillin will be described.
Syphilis is a contagious infectious disease caused by Treponema
pallidum, transmitted mainly sexually, in which the agent penetrates
the skin after small abrasions. Soon after, there is hematogenic dissemination, at
which point any organ may be affected by the disease – among them, the stomach.Gastric syphilis (GS), although not frequently remembered outside the scope of
gastroenterology, has been a theme of medical studies since 1834, when Andral
published the first two cases of patients with syphilis and gastric symptoms, which
improved through treatment available at the time.[1]Gastric involvement occurs in less than 1% of syphilis cases, with the antrum as the
most affected site. Average age of the affected is 39, with predominance of males.
Around 60% of patients with GS have current or previous history of
syphilis.[2] In the present
case, we will describe a case of a patient with secondary syphilis and gastric
involvement, who was diagnosed based on an investigation started by the
gastroenterologist.
CASE REPORT
50-year-old male, single, looked for a gastroenterologist, complaining of
epigastralgia, reported losing 6 kg, anorexia and early satiety for the last month.
He denied other gastrointestinal symptoms. Due to a suspected cancer in the
digestive tube, considering his age bracket and symptoms, an upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy (UGI) was requested with biopsies, which revealed antrum with edematous
mucosa, infiltrated, friable, with bleeding spots and flat erosions, besides
edematous mucosal pleating with foci of enanthema (Figures 1 and 2). The
histopathological examination of gastric mucosa revealed a diffuse inflammatory
infiltrate, mainly lymphoplasmacytic, and absence of malignancy (Figure 3).
Figure 1
Image from upper digestive endoscopy showing antrum with edematous
mucosa, infiltrated, friable, with bleeding spots and flat erosions
Figure 2
Image from upper digestive endoscopy showing edematous mucosal pleating,
with foci of enanthema
Image from upper digestive endoscopy showing antrum with edematous
mucosa, infiltrated, friable, with bleeding spots and flat erosionsImage from upper digestive endoscopy showing edematous mucosal pleating,
with foci of enanthemaHistopathological examination of gastric mucosa revealing diffuse
inflammatory infiltrate, mainly lymphoplasmacytic (HE, 400x)Treponemal (FTA-Abs) and non-treponemal (VDRL = 1/32) tests were positive. The
patient was referred to the Dermatology Service, and, upon examination, showed
diffuse exanthema and generalized polyadenomegaly (Figures 4 and 5). He denied having
noticed the hard chancre.
Figure 4
Light exanthema on the flank and on the right iliac fossa
Figure 5
Light exanthema on the left side of trunk
Light exanthema on the flank and on the right iliac fossaLight exanthema on the left side of trunkConsidering the findings described, secondary syphilis with gastric involvement was
diagnosed and the preconized treatment for it was started with benzathine penicillin
(two doses of 2,400,000 IU, every seven days), as well as compulsory notification.
One month later, the patient was asymptomatic and a new UGI with biopsies showed
complete remission of gastric mucosa lesions (Figure
6).
Figure 6
Image from upper digestive endoscopy one month after treatment with
4,800,000 IU of benzathine penicillin
Image from upper digestive endoscopy one month after treatment with
4,800,000 IU of benzathine penicillin
DISCUSSION
GS is caused by vasculitis in the gastric mucosa generated by hematous dissemination
of T. pallidum and is not linked to the ingestion of the
agent.[3] It may occur in any
phase of syphilis, predominantly in the secondary (50%) and more rarely in the third
(6%).[2]The most common clinical manifestations of GS are epigastralgia (92%), nausea and
vomit (71%), emaciation (60%) and early satiety (19%) - all unspecific
symptoms.[2] The absence of
cutaneous lesions from syphilis does not exclude the diagnosis of GS.[2]In the UGI, we observed reduction of gastric expandability, multiple ulcerations,
hypertrophy of gastric walls, nodules in the mucosa, edema, enanthema and
friability. GS has the following as endoscopic differential diagnoses: lymphoma,
linitis plastica, tuberculosis and Crohn's disease. In these diseases, however, the
lesions go beyond the pylorus, whereas in GS there is abrupt interruption of lesions
in the pylorus.[4]Through histopathology we observe chronic gastritis with dense lymphoplasmocytic
infiltrate.[5] Endovasculitis
is a typical finding, although infrequent, for gastric biopsies are more
superficial. There are reports in the literature of concomitant presence of
Helicobacter pylori, which does not make the diagnosis invalid,
but it is discussed if it acts in conjunction with the treponema, damaging the
gastric mucosa.[2]Detection of T. pallidum is difficult and is not mandatory for
diagnosing GS. However, when it is available for PCR, it should be done, thus
providing a certain diagnostic. There is the consensus that the physician should
consider the patient as a carrier of GS based on the correlation of suggestive
clinical findings, endoscopic image, histopathology and laboratory tests.[6]For this patient, the diagnosis of syphilis was reached considering his gastric
complaints, since the cutaneous manifestations were not so evident and were not the
reason of his medical evaluation. Nevertheless, it was possible to observe them in
the dermatological examination.In a systematic review of GS cases reported in the last 50 years, published in 2010,
Mylona et al. concluded that diagnosis of GS must be considered in
patients who are in the risk group of sexually transmitted diseases and who present
uncommon endoscopical lesions, without a definite diagnosis, with gastric problems
resistant to pump inhibitors and with histopathological examination of gastric
mucosa pointing to GS.[2]The recommended treatment is the same for syphilis, according to wich phase of the
disease the patient is in.In short, this case report has the goal of showing the occurrence of GS, which is
unknown by the majority of physicians. With the increasing incidence of syphilis (in
the US, the rates of syphilis cases recently went up 15.2% from 2006 to 2007),
mainly among men who have sexual intercourse with other men, gastric involvement may
become more frequent.[7]
Authors: Eleni E Mylona; Ioannis G Baraboutis; Vasilios Papastamopoulos; Eleftheria P Tsagalou; Evangelos Vryonis; Michael Samarkos; Panagiotis Fanourgiakis; Athanasios Skoutelis Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.830