Robinson Ramírez-Vélez1, Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista2, Javier Martínez-Torres3, Katherine González-Ruíz4, Emilio González-Jiménez5, Jacqueline Schmidt-Rio Valle6, Antonio Garcia-Hermoso7,8. 1. Centro de Estudios para la Medición de la Actividad Física «CEMA», Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá D.C. 111221, Colombia. robin640@hotmail.com. 2. Centro de Estudios para la Medición de la Actividad Física «CEMA», Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá D.C. 111221, Colombia. jorge.correa@urosario.edu.co. 3. Centro de Estudios para la Medición de la Actividad Física «CEMA», Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá D.C. 111221, Colombia. javiermartinezt@usantotomas.edu.co. 4. Grupo de Ejercicio Físico y Deportes, Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones, Universidad Manuela Beltrán, Bogotá, D.C. 110231, Colombia. Katherine.gonzalez@docentes.umb.edu.co. 5. Grupo CTS-436, Adscrito al Centro de Investigación Mente, Cerebro y Comportamiento (CIMCYC), Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Granada, Granada 18071, España. emigoji@ugr.es. 6. Grupo CTS-436, Adscrito al Centro de Investigación Mente, Cerebro y Comportamiento (CIMCYC), Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Granada, Granada 18071, España. jschmidt@ugr.es. 7. Laboratorio de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, el Deporte y la Salud, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, USACH, Santiago 7500618, Chile. antonio.garcia.h@usach.cl. 8. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago 8420524, Chile. antonio.garcia.h@usach.cl.
We would like to make the following correction to our recently published paper [1]. First, the FUPRECOL study was conducted from 2014 to 2015 in a convenience sample of volunteers and grouped by sex and age with one-year increments (a total of nine groups). In total, 8000 school children from 27 official schools aged 9.0–17.0 years, with valid data for gender and body mass index (BMI) were included in a primary study [2]. In this paper, we analyzed a secondary cross-sectional study through data from the bioelectrical impedance (BIA) analysis. This sample size was randomly performed in one-sixth of the recruited children and adolescents (n = 1164, in six official schools). Second, the sample size was 1165 (52.7% girls) which represents 14.5% of the primary sample size study. Third, the match between the participant’s distribution by age groups and gender in the weight status has been corrected (Table 1).
Table 1
Characteristics of school children by sex and age.
Weight Status
Boys
Girls
9–11 Years
12–14 Years
15–17 Years
9–11 Years
12–14 Years
15–17 Years
(n = 159)
(n = 233)
(n = 158)
(n = 175)
(n = 273)
(n = 167)
Underweight
11 (6.8)
39 (16.6)
24 (15.3)
32 (18.3)
41 (15.1)
25 (14.7)
Normal
101 (63.3)
145 (62.4)
114 (72.4)
78 (44.4)
153 (56.1)
94 (56.0)
Overweight
28 (17.7)
34 (14.6)
16 (10.4)
44 (25.0)
65 (23.9)
40 (23.9)
Obesity
19 (12.2)
15 (6.3)
3 (1.8)
21 (12.2)
13 (4.9)
9 (5.4)
These changes have no material impact on the conclusions of our paper. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage. We apologize for any inconvenience caused to our readers.
Authors: Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Martin Martínez; Jorge E Correa-Bautista; Felipe Lobelo; Mikel Izquierdo; Fernando Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Carlos Cristi-Montero Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Tengfei Man; Ilja M Nolte; Deepali Jaju; Zahir A M Al-Anqoudi; M Loretto Muñoz; Mohammed O Hassan; Said Al-Yahyaee; Riad A Bayoumi; Anthony G Comuzzie; John S Floras; Arie M van Roon; Harriëtte Riese; Sulayma Albarwani; Harold Snieder Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 4.776