| Literature DB >> 27826446 |
Yassir Nawaz1, Mihir Barvalia1, Gurinder Rana1, M Zain Khakwani1, Khizr Azim1, Rahul Patel1, Sohira Idrees1, Gail Baker1, Marc Cohen1, Najam Wasty1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine factors affecting actual inguinal ligament course in live human subjects. INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Although the expected inguinal ligament course is supposedly a straight line extending from anterior superior iliac spine to pubic tubercle, the actual inguinal ligament course is frequently depicted a priori by a downward bowing dotted line. There are no studies in a live subject supporting this assumption. We hypothesized this assumption is indeed valid and is related to among other factors a lifelong effect of gravity and lax abdominal musculature on the inguinal ligament course.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac catheterization; anatomic landmarks; femoral artery punctures
Year: 2016 PMID: 27826446 PMCID: PMC5084609 DOI: 10.1177/2050312116675565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SAGE Open Med ISSN: 2050-3121
Figure 1.Frequent a priori representation of the AILC by a downward curved line.
Figure 2.Abdominal CT imaging reconstructed using Terracon software showing: arrows A—AILC; arrows B—EILC.
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics (n = 54).
| Mean ± SD or n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53.2 ± 18.5 |
| Male gender | 26 (48.1%) |
| Weight (lbs) | 165 ± 11.5 |
| BMI | 28.7 ± 7.2 |
| DM | 21 (38.9%) |
| HTN | 33 (61.1%) |
| CAD | 13 (24.1%) |
| Smoker | 25 (46.3%) |
| Previous surgery | 29 (53.7%) |
| IL-deviation (mm) | 8.2 ± 5.9 |
SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; DM: diabetes mellitus; HTN: systemic hypertension; CAD: coronary artery disease; IL: inguinal ligament.
Correlation of different variables with deviation of inguinal ligament.
| Clinical variables | r (Pearson’s correlation) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | −0.45 | 0.001 |
| BMI | −0.08 | 0.55 |
BMI: body mass index.
Figure 3.Scatter plot showing age-related deviation of the AILC.
Figure 4.Histogram showing distribution of deviation (in mm) on x-axis and number of patients with deviation on y-axis.
Figure 5.Angiogram of a high bifurcation of the common femoral artery (CFA).