| Literature DB >> 27826436 |
Li Liu1, Mei-Ling Ji1, Min Chen1, Ming-Yue Sun1, Xi-Ling Fu1, Ling Li1, Dong-Sheng Gao1, Cui-Ying Zhu1.
Abstract
Strawberry fruits (cv. Benihoppe, Tochiotome, Sachinoka, and Guimeiren) were harvested and evaluated the flavor and nutritional parameters. By principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis, differences were observed based on the volatile compounds composition, sugar and acid concentration, sweetness, and total soluble sugars/total organic acids of the four varieties. A total of 37, 48, 65, and 74 volatile compounds were identified and determined in cv. Benihoppe, Tochiotome, Sachinoka, and Guimeiren strawberry fruits extracted by head-space solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), respectively. Esters significantly dominated the chemical composition of the four varieties. Furaneol was detected in cultivars of Sachinoka and Guimeiren, but mesifuran was only found in cv. Tochiotome. Tochiotome and Sachinoka showed higher content of linalool and (E)-nerolidol. Sachinoka showed the highest content of total sugars and total acids. Guimeiren showed higher sweetness index than the other three cultivars. Firmness of Tochiotome was highest among all the varieties. The highest total soluble solids TSS value was found in cv. Sachinoka, followed by the Guimeiren and Tochiotome varieties. Sachinoka had the highest titratable acidity TA value. The content of ascorbic acid (AsA) of cv. Tochiotome was higher than the others, but there was no significant difference in cultivars of Benihoppe, Tochiotome, and Sachinoka. Fructose and glucose were the major sugars in all cultivars. Citric acid was the major organic acid in cv. Tochiotome, cv. Sachinoka, and cv. Guimeiren. Tochiotome had higher ratios of TSS/TA and total sugars/total organic acids than others, arising from its lower acid content. The order of the comprehensive evaluation score was Sachinoka>Guimeiren>Tochiotome>Benihoppe.Entities:
Keywords: Flavor; GC–MS; PCA; strawberry; volatile compounds
Year: 2016 PMID: 27826436 PMCID: PMC5090650 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Percentage of volatile compounds found in the four strawberry varieties.
Figure 2Hierarchical clustering and heat map visualization showing concentration of volatile aroma compounds identified in the strawberry samples. Dark and blue indicate low content. Green indicates intermediate content, and red indicates high content.
Principal component analysis for volatile compounds of strawberry
| Component | Initial characteristic value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue | Variance (%) | Cumulative (%) | |
| 1 | 36.3587 | 0.4328 | 0.4328 |
| 2 | 28.7054 | 0.3417 | 0.7745 |
| 3 | 18.9359 | 0.2254 | 0.9999 |
Principal components value of volatile compounds of strawberry
| Variety | Component 1 | Component 2 | Component 3 | Synthetic component |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benihoppe | −3.4017 | −3.8673 | −0.7111 | −2.9539 |
| Tochiotome | −5.7432 | −2.3538 | 5.8333 | −1.9751 |
| Sachinoka | −0.1345 | 2.4099 | 3.93086 | 1.6513 |
| Guimeiren | 3.8427 | −1.3651 | 1.95257 | 1.6368 |
Physicochemical parameters determined in strawberry fruits of different varieties
| Variety | Fruit shape | Fruit weight (g) | Firmness (kg) | TSS (Brix). | TA (g citric acid/kg) | TSS/TA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benihoppe | Conical | 35.00 ± 2.10a | 0.03 ± 0.00b | 10.27 ± 1.33b | 5.63 ± 0.67b | 18.26 ± 1.48ab |
| Tochiotome | Long conical | 21.50 ± 2.74c | 0.04 ± 0.00a | 11.10 ± 0.90ab | 5.43 ± 0.60b | 20.65 ± 3.23a |
| Sachinoka | Short conical | 21.67 ± 1.37c | 0.02 ± 0.00bc | 12.47 ± 0.50a | 7.70 ± 0.72a | 16.32 ± 2.18b |
| Guimeiren | Conical | 25.17 ± 2.32b | 0.02 ± 0.00c | 11.13 ± 0.42ab | 6.50 ± 0.82ab | 17.25 ± 1.48ab |
TA, titratable acidity.
TSS, total soluble solids.
Letters are comparisons of the four strawberry cultivars. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05) by least significant difference (LSD) test.
Soluble sugars and ascorbic acid (AsA) content in strawberry fruits of different varieties expressed as g kg−1 of fresh fruit weight
| Strawberry variety | Fructose | Glucose | Sucrose | Sorbitol | AsA (g kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benihoppe | 22.87 ± 0.95c | 17.10 ± 1.11c | 0.13 ± 0.01c | 0.07 ± 0.00a | 0.45 ± 0.19a |
| Tochiotome | 24.60 ± 1.03c | 21.37 ± 1.39b | 4.86 ± 0.46b | 0.03 ± 0.00b | 0.46 ± 0.19a |
| Sachinoka | 28.84 ± 1.20b | 25.34 ± 1.65a | 12.07 ± 1.15a | ND | 0.44 ± 0.19a |
| Guimeiren | 35.15 ± 1.46a | 25.60 ± 1.67a | 1.15 ± 0.11c | ND | 0.39 ± 0.16b |
Letters are comparisons of the four strawberry cultivars. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05) by least significant difference (LSD) test.
ND, not detected.
Organic acids content in strawberry fruits of different varieties expressed as g kg−1 of fresh fruit weight
| Strawberry variety | Citric acid | Succinic acid | Malic acid | Oxalic acid | Lactic acid | Acetic acid | Tartaric acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benihoppe | 5.20 ± 0.45c | 6.65 ± 0.93a | 0.50 ± 0.03d | 1.67 ± 0.07a | 0.54 ± 0.04b | 0.54 ± 0.04a | 0.55 ± 0.04a |
| Tochiotome | 4.29 ± 0.37c | 1.43 ± 0.20c | 1.70 ± 0.10a | 1.37 ± 0.06b | 0.61 ± 0.05a | 0.44 ± 0.05b | ND |
| Sachinoka | 17.54 ± 1.52a | 1.71 ± 0.24c | 1.61 ± 0.10b | 1.31 ± 0.06d | ND | ND | ND |
| Guimeiren | 6.87 ± 0.60b | 2.88 ± 0.40b | 0.95 ± 0.05c | 1.34 ± 0.06c | 0.58 ± 0.04a | 0.40 ± 0.05b | 0.15 ± 0.01b |
Letters are comparisons of the four strawberry cultivars. Means with the same letter are not significantly.
Different (P = 0.05) by least significant difference (LSD) test.
ND, not detected.
Total sugars and total acids content, and the ratio of total sugar/total acids in strawberry fruits of different varieties in a soilless growing system
| Strawberry variety | Total sugars | Total acids | Total sugars/total acids | Sweetness index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benihoppe | 40.18 ± 2.03d | 15.31 ± 1.71b | 2.65 ± 0.41d | 53.02 ± 2.46c |
| Tochiotome | 50.86 ± 2.22c | 9.94 ± 0.93c | 5.15 ± 0.65a | 63.96 ± 2.66b |
| Sachinoka | 66.26 ± 2.52a | 21.77 ± 2.23a | 3.07 ± 0.37c | 81.55 ± 3.06a |
| Guimeiren | 61.90 ± 3.04b | 13.02 ± 1.32b | 4.79 ± 0.62b | 81.86 ± 3.72a |
Letters are comparisons of the four strawberry cultivars. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05) by least significant difference (LSD) test.
ND, not detected.
Figure 3Scores (A) and loadings (B) of principal component analysis for the strawberry samples. In Figure 3B, “sweetness” refers to “sweetness index.”