| Literature DB >> 27826435 |
Ochuko L Erukainure1, Jane N C Okafor1, Akinyele Ogunji1, Happiness Ukazu2, Ebele N Okafor1, Ijeoma L Eboagwu1.
Abstract
The rheological behavior and functional properties of doughs from bambara-wheat composite flour was investigated. Bambara-wheat composite flour was prepared by substituting wheat with 0%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of bambara flour. The rheological behavior of their dough was analyzed with Mixolab. Breads produced from the flour were analyzed for physical characteristics. Organoleptic analysis was carried out by 20 panelists. Mixolab analysis revealed, except for stability time, depreciating values for dough consistency (C1), protein weakening (C2), starch gelatinization (C3), amylase activity (C4), and retrogradation (C5) as the inclusion of bambara flour increased. Physical characteristics of the loaves revealed significant (P < 0.05) decreasing bread volume and increasing specific volume, respectively, as bambara inclusion increased. There was significant (P < 0.05) difference between wheat bread and the bambara-wheat composites in all the studied quality attributes. 15% bambara-wheat composite bread was the most accepted amongst the composite breads. Inclusion of bambara flour improved the protein behavior of the composite, but did not evidently show benefits in the baking characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Mixolab; bambara nuts; composite flour; rheological behavior
Year: 2016 PMID: 27826435 PMCID: PMC5090649 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.356
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Recipes for production of wheat and bambara–wheat composite breads
| Recipes | Weight (g)(%) |
|---|---|
| Flour | 87 |
| Salt | 2 |
| Sugar | 7 |
| Fat | 3 |
| Yeast | 1 |
Figure 1Mixolab® curves comparing the rheological behaviors of bambara–wheat doughs to whole wheat flour dough.
Figure 2Values for Mixolab curve (C1–C5) of wheat and bambara–wheat composite doughs. Values = mean ±SD; n = 3.
Figure 3α, β and γ slopes of Mixolab curves of wheat and bambara–wheat composite doughs. Values = mean ±SD; n = 3. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Figure 4Effect of bambara inclusion on functional properties of bambara–wheat dough. Values = mean ±SD; n = 3. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Figure 5Physical characteristics of bambara–wheat breads. Value = mean ±SD; n = 3. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05. (A) Dough weight, loaf weight, and loaf volume of bambara–wheat breads. (B) Specifi c volume of bambara–wheat breads.
Figure 6Organoleptic properties of bambara–wheat breads. Value = mean ±SD; n = 20. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05