Literature DB >> 27825733

A comparison of DNA extraction protocols from blood spotted on FTA cards for the detection of tick-borne pathogens by Reverse Line Blot hybridization.

Zerihun Hailemariam1, Jabbar Sabir Ahmed2, Peter-Henning Clausen3, Ard Menzo Nijhof4.   

Abstract

An essential step in the molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in blood is the extraction of DNA. When cooled storage of blood under field conditions prior to DNA extraction in a dedicated laboratory is not possible, the storage of blood on filter paper forms a promising alternative. We evaluated six DNA extraction methods from blood spotted on FTA Classic® cards (FTA cards), to determine the optimal protocol for the subsequent molecular detection of TBPs by PCR and the Reverse Line Blot hybridization assay (RLB). Ten-fold serial dilutions of bovine blood infected with Babesia bovis, Theileria mutans, Anaplasma marginale or Ehrlichia ruminantium were made by dilution with uninfected blood and spotted on FTA cards. Subsequently, DNA was extracted from FTA cards using six different DNA extraction protocols. DNA was also isolated from whole blood dilutions using a commercial kit. PCR/RLB results showed that washing of 3mm discs punched from FTA cards with FTA purification reagent followed by DNA extraction using Chelex® resin was the most sensitive procedure. The detection limit could be improved when more discs were used as starting material for the DNA extraction, whereby the use of sixteen 3mm discs proved to be most practical. The presented best practice method for the extraction of DNA from blood spotted on FTA cards will facilitate epidemiological studies on TBPs. It may be particularly useful for field studies where a cold chain is absent. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chelex; DNA extraction; FTA cards; FTA purification reagent; Reverse line blot hybridization; Tick-borne pathogens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27825733     DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis        ISSN: 1877-959X            Impact factor:   3.744


  5 in total

1.  Molecular Survey and Genetic Characterization of Anaplasma marginale in Ticks Collected from Livestock Hosts in Pakistan.

Authors:  Zaibullah Khan; Shehla Shehla; Abdulaziz Alouffi; Muhammad Kashif Obaid; Alam Zeb Khan; Mashal M Almutairi; Muhammad Numan; Ome Aiman; Shumaila Alam; Shafi Ullah; Sher Zaman Safi; Tetsuya Tanaka; Abid Ali
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction kit, matrix sample and qPCR assays for bovine babesiosis monitoring.

Authors:  Cintia Hiromi Okino; Rodrigo Giglioti; Pamella Cristini Silva; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Márcia Cristina de Sena Oliveira
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Method for improving the quality of genomic DNA obtained from minute quantities of tissue and blood samples using Chelex 100 resin.

Authors:  Utkarsha A Singh; Mukta Kumari; Soumya Iyengar
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.244

4.  Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Ticks and Molecular Survey of Anaplasma marginale, with Notes on Their Phylogeny.

Authors:  Shumaila Alam; Mehran Khan; Abdulaziz Alouffi; Mashal M Almutairi; Shafi Ullah; Muhammad Numan; Nabila Islam; Zaibullah Khan; Ome Aiman; Sher Zaman Safi; Tetsuya Tanaka; Abid Ali
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-08-17

5.  Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in cattle from Southwestern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zerihun Hailemariam; Jürgen Krücken; Maximilian Baumann; Jabbar S Ahmed; Peter-Henning Clausen; Ard M Nijhof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.