Literature DB >> 27824258

Full Neurovascular Sparing Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Our Experience with PERUSIA Technique.

Giovanni Cochetti1, Andrea Boni1, Francesco Barillaro1, Solajd Pohja1, Roberto Cirocchi2, Ettore Mearini1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Primary aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and the safety of PERUSIA (posterior, extraperitoneal, robotic, under santorini, intrafascial, anterograde) radical prostatectomy (RP). Secondary aim was to evaluate oncologic and functional results. The main intent of PERUSIA is to reduce injury of the Neuro-Vascular Bundles (NVB) and to preserve periurethral anterior structures. This is the first reported prospective cohort study about our technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected prospective data of a cohort of 210 patients who had undergone PERUSIA RP between January 2013 and May 2015. Key points of this technique included the following: posterior approach to intrafascial plane, which was developed from the median to lateral side, anterograde preservation of the Veil of Aphrodite, and development of an anterior avascular plane to preserve the santorini plexus. We included only sexually potent patients with low-risk disease. Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes were collected. Postoperative full continence was defined as no pad use. Patients were defined potent when International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score was >17. Median follow-up was 22 months.
RESULTS: Median operative time and median estimated blood loss were 120 minutes and 150 mL, respectively. 25 patients (11.9%) experienced a total of 36 complications overall with an overall complication rate of 17.1%. We reported 3 (8.3%) grade IIIb complications and no major ones. Overall positive surgical margin rate was 20% with biochemical recurrence occurring in 3.8% of patients at a median follow-up of 22 months. Immediate urinary continence rate (1 day after catheter removal) was 66.6%. At 3 and 12 months, the continence rate was 90.4% and 96.1%, respectively, while sexual potency rate was 70.4% and 80.9%.
CONCLUSION: PERUSIA RP has proved to be safe and effective for low-risk prostate cancer with exciting functional outcomes in terms of early recovery of urinary continence and sexual potency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extraperitoneal surgery; immediate continence; intrafascial approach; santorini plexus preservation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27824258     DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  8 in total

1.  Combined Open Prostatectomy and Kidney Surgery: Feasibility and 12-Month Outcome.

Authors:  Lukas Rath; Friedrich Jokisch; Gerald Bastian Schulz; Alexander Kretschmer; Alexander Buchner; Christian G Stief; Philipp Weinhold
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-11-23

2.  Endopelvic Fascia Sparing Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Studer Pouch with Balbay's Technique.

Authors:  Mevlana Derya Balbay; Ersin Köseoğlu; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Arif Özkan; Mert Kılıç; Murat Can Kiremit; Ahmet Musaoğlu; Kayhan Tarım; Ahmet Furkan Sarıkaya
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

3.  A Combined Technology to Protect the Anatomic Integrity of Distal Urethral Sphincter Complex in Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Continence Recovery Without Sacrifice of Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Ao Liu; Yi Gao; Hai Huang; Xiaoqun Yang; Wenhao Lin; Lu Chen; Danfeng Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Combined Robotic Surgery for Double Renal Masses and Prostate Cancer: Myth or Reality?

Authors:  Giovanni Cochetti; Diego Cocca; Stefania Maddonni; Alessio Paladini; Elena Sarti; Davide Stivalini; Ettore Mearini
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  The accumulation of metabolic syndrome components is associated with higher risk of positive surgical margin among patients with localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xiaonan Zheng; Shi Qiu; Xinyang Liao; Xin Han; Kun Jin; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection in Mini-invasive Urological Surgery.

Authors:  Jacopo Adolfo Rossi de Vermandois; Giovanni Cochetti; Michele Del Zingaro; Alberto Santoro; Mattia Panciarola; Andrea Boni; Matteo Marsico; Gianluca Gaudio; Alessio Paladini; Paolo Guiggi; Roberto Cirocchi; Ettore Mearini
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-09-15

7.  Endorectal power Doppler/grayscale ultrasound-guided biopsies vs. multiparametric MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies in males with high risk of prostate cancer: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhizhong He; Zhifan Yuan; Limei Liang; Xinx In Xie; Jianjun Yuan; Wenxu He; Junjun Chen; Yongpei Kuang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Pro-Survival Factor EDEM3 Confers Therapy Resistance in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Emma Scott; Rebecca Garnham; Kathleen Cheung; Adam Duxfield; David J Elliott; Jennifer Munkley
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.