Lauren T Southerland1, Lauren Slattery2, Joseph A Rosenthal3, Deborah Kegelmeyer4, Anne Kloos4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: Lauren.Southerland@osumc.edu. 2. Ohio State University School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Columbus, OH. 3. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. 4. Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The American College of Emergency Physicians Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines and the Center for Disease Control recommend that older adults be assessed for risk of falls. The standard ED assessment is a verbal query of fall risk factors, which may be inadequate. We hypothesized that the addition of a functional balance test endorsed by the Center for Disease Control Stop Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries Falls Prevention Guidelines, the 4-Stage Balance Test (4SBT), would improve the detection of patients at risk for falls. METHODS: Prospective pilot study of a convenience sample of ambulatory adults 65 years and older in the ED. All participants received the standard nursing triage fall risk assessment. After patients were stabilized in their ED room, the 4SBT was administered. RESULTS: The 58 participants had an average age of 74.1 years (range, 65-94), 40.0% were women, and 98% were community dwelling. Five (8.6%) presented to the ED for a fall-related chief complaint. The nursing triage screen identified 39.7% (n=23) as at risk for falls, whereas the 4SBT identified 43% (n=25). Combining triage questions with the 4SBT identified 60.3% (n=35) as at high risk for falls, as compared with 39.7% (n=23) with triage questions alone (P<.01). Ten (17%) of the patients at high risk by 4SBT and missed by triage questions were inpatients unaware that they were at risk for falls (new diagnoses). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating a quick functional test of balance into the ED assessment for fall risk is feasible and significantly increases the detection of older adults at risk for falls.
OBJECTIVES: The American College of Emergency Physicians Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines and the Center for Disease Control recommend that older adults be assessed for risk of falls. The standard ED assessment is a verbal query of fall risk factors, which may be inadequate. We hypothesized that the addition of a functional balance test endorsed by the Center for Disease Control Stop Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries Falls Prevention Guidelines, the 4-Stage Balance Test (4SBT), would improve the detection of patients at risk for falls. METHODS: Prospective pilot study of a convenience sample of ambulatory adults 65 years and older in the ED. All participants received the standard nursing triage fall risk assessment. After patients were stabilized in their ED room, the 4SBT was administered. RESULTS: The 58 participants had an average age of 74.1 years (range, 65-94), 40.0% were women, and 98% were community dwelling. Five (8.6%) presented to the ED for a fall-related chief complaint. The nursing triage screen identified 39.7% (n=23) as at risk for falls, whereas the 4SBT identified 43% (n=25). Combining triage questions with the 4SBT identified 60.3% (n=35) as at high risk for falls, as compared with 39.7% (n=23) with triage questions alone (P<.01). Ten (17%) of the patients at high risk by 4SBT and missed by triage questions were inpatients unaware that they were at risk for falls (new diagnoses). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating a quick functional test of balance into the ED assessment for fall risk is feasible and significantly increases the detection of older adults at risk for falls.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Nicole D A Boyé; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Klaas A Hartholt; Ed F Van Beeck; Tischa J M Van der Cammen Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 2.730
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Michael S Avidan; Tanya Wildes; Susan Stark; Susan A Fowler; Alexander X Lo Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Daniel Schoene; Sandy M-S Wu; A Stefanie Mikolaizak; Jasmine C Menant; Stuart T Smith; Kim Delbaere; Stephen R Lord Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Gregory Tirrell; Jiraporn Sri-on; Lewis A Lipsitz; Carlos A Camargo; Christopher Kabrhel; Shan W Liu Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Gwen Costa Jacobsohn; Margaret Leaf; Frank Liao; Apoorva P Maru; Collin J Engstrom; Megan E Salwei; Gerald T Pankratz; Alexis Eastman; Pascale Carayon; Douglas A Wiegmann; Joel S Galang; Maureen A Smith; Manish N Shah; Brian W Patterson Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2021-12-16
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Julie A Stephens; Christopher R Carpenter; Lorraine C Mion; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Angela Zachman; Michael Hill; Jeffrey M Caterino Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2020-02-25
Authors: Elizabeth M Goldberg; Sarah J Marks; Aderonke Ilegbusi; Linda Resnik; Daniel H Strauss; Roland C Merchant Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Katherine M Hunold; Jenifer Van Fossen; Jeffrey M Caterino; Peg Gulker; Julie A Stephens; Jason J Bischof; Erin Farrell; Christopher R Carpenter; Lorraine C Mion Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Katherine M Hunold; Elizabeth M Goldberg; Jeffrey M Caterino; Ula Hwang; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Manish N Shah; Tony Rosen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Maria Dos Anjos Coelho Rodrigues Dixe; Ana Querido; Susana Mendonça; Pedro Sousa; Helena Monteiro; Daniel Carvalho; Paulo Lopes; Pedro Rodrigues Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-02-28