Literature DB >> 27823895

Impact of residual mitral regurgitation after MitraClip implantation.

Hidehiro Kaneko1, Michael Neuss1, Jens Weissenborn1, Christian Butter2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MitraClip (MC) is an alternative treatment for mitral regurgitation (MR). Although residual MR is common after MC, little was known about the impact of residual MR after MC.
METHODS: We examined 255 consecutive patients who underwent MC. The primary endpoint was the composite endpoint including all-cause death, left ventricular (LV) assist device, and mitral valve surgery.
RESULTS: Procedure failure defined as unsuccessful MC implantation (n=6) and residual MR ≥3+ (n=19) was associated with worse outcomes including the primary endpoint and all-cause death than those with acute procedure success (APS) defined as residual MR 2+ (n=125) or 1+ (n=105). Among patient with APS, background characteristics including age, MR etiology, heart failure severity, and LV function were not different. Although MR grade and NT-pro BNP level at 6months after MC were higher in patients with residual MR 2+, there was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint and all-cause death. Subanalysis showed that the primary endpoint occurred more frequently in patients with MR 2+ in patients with LV ejection fraction ≤40%, chronic kidney disease, and baseline NYHA-class IV.
CONCLUSION: Procedure failure was associated with adverse outcomes after MC. Among patients with APS, residual MR 2+ was not significantly associated with overall worse outcomes than residual MR 1+. However, residual MR 2+ was associated with poorer prognosis in patients with impaired LV function, renal dysfunction, and severe heart failure, suggesting that the optimal endpoint of MC procedure should be individualized according to each patient's baseline characteristic.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic kidney disease; Heart failure; Left ventricular function; MitraClip; Residual mitral regurgitation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27823895     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of percutaneous MitraClip versus mitral valve surgery for severe mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis: Mitraclip and mitral valve surgery meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tom Kai Ming Wang; Andrew Chatfield; Michael Tzu Min Wang; Peter Ruygrok
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2020-12-02

2.  Clinical outcomes of conventional surgery versus MitraClip® therapy for moderate to severe symptomatic mitral valve regurgitation in the elderly population: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Anthony Alozie; Liliya Paranskaya; Bernd Westphal; Alexander Kaminski; Mohammad Sherif; Magnus Sindt; Stephan Kische; Jochen Schubert; Doreen Diedrich; Hüseyin Ince; Gustav Steinhoff; Alper Öner
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  One-year results following PASCAL-based or MitraClip-based mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

Authors:  Nicolas A Geis; Philipp Schlegel; Markus B Heckmann; Hugo A Katus; Norbert Frey; Patricia Crespo López; Philip W J Raake
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 4.  Role of 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair-A Mini Review.

Authors:  Kensuke Hirasawa; Masaki Izumo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-02

5.  Predictors of functional mitral regurgitation recurrence after percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Katharina Hellhammer; Jean M Haurand; Maximilian Spieker; Peter Luedike; Tienush Rassaf; Tobias Zeus; Malte Kelm; Ralf Westenfeld; Patrick Horn
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  PASCAL mitral valve repair system versus MitraClip: comparison of transcatheter edge-to-edge strategies in complex primary mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Muhammed Gerçek; Fabian Roder; Tanja K Rudolph; Vera Fortmeier; Armin Zittermann; Volker Rudolph; Kai P Friedrichs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.460

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.