Literature DB >> 27822904

A new prognostic strategy for adult patients with acute pulmonary embolism eligible for outpatient therapy.

Federico Angriman1,2, Fernando J Vazquez2, Pierre Marie Roy3, Gregoire Le Gal4, Marc Carrier4, Esteban Gandara5.   

Abstract

We sought to derive a parsimonious predictive model to identify a subgroup of patients that will experience a low number of adverse events within 14 days of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with acute pulmonary embolism at the Ottawa Hospital between 2007 and 2012. Primary outcome was defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding within 14 days. Multivariate logistic regression models were fit to model the occurrence of the primary outcome so as to guide either outpatient therapy or early discharge after initial admission. Calibration and discrimination were assessed in both the derivation and internal validation cohorts. 1143 patients were included, of whom 42% were treated as outpatients. At pulmonary embolism diagnosis, final score to predict the primary outcome included age, malignancy, intravenous drug or oxygen requirement and systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.84) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.89) in the derivation and validation cohorts respectively. Conversely, final score to predict primary outcome after initial admission included age, malignancy, intravenous drug requirement and systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (AUC: 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.76) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) in the derivation and validation cohorts). We have developed two simple clinical scores that may identify patients with pulmonary embolism at low risk of clinically meaningful outcomes during the first 14 days of follow up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outpatient; Prognosis; Pulmonary embolism; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27822904     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1451-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  25 in total

1.  A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; D Scott Obrosky; Roslyn A Stone; Thomas E Auble; Arnaud Perrier; Jacques Cornuz; Pierre-Marie Roy; Michael J Fine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-23

2.  Aspirin for preventing the recurrence of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Cecilia Becattini; Giancarlo Agnelli; Alessandro Schenone; Sabine Eichinger; Eugenio Bucherini; Mauro Silingardi; Marina Bianchi; Marco Moia; Walter Ageno; Maria Rita Vandelli; Elvira Grandone; Paolo Prandoni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Out of hospital treatment of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a low NT-proBNP level.

Authors:  M J Agterof; R E G Schutgens; R J Snijder; G Epping; H G Peltenburg; E F M Posthuma; J A Hardeman; R van der Griend; T Koster; M H Prins; D H Biesma
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Expanding eligibility for outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a comparison of patient self-injection with homecare injection.

Authors:  P S Wells; M J Kovacs; J Bormanis; M A Forgie; D Goudie; B Morrow; J Kovacs
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-14

5.  Does the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index accurately identify low risk patients eligible for outpatient treatment?

Authors:  Petra M G Erkens; Esteban Gandara; Philip S Wells; Alex Yi-Hao Shen; Gauruv Bose; Gregoire Le Gal; Marc Rodger; Martin H Prins; Marc Carrier
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; D Scott Obrosky; Roslyn A Stone; Thomas E Auble; Arnaud Perrier; Jacques Cornuz; Pierre-Marie Roy; Michael J Fine
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 7.  Is it time for home treatment of pulmonary embolism?

Authors:  Mareike Lankeit; Stavros Konstantinides
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Clive Kearon; Ajay K Kakkar; Patrick Mismetti; Sebastian Schellong; Henry Eriksson; David Baanstra; Janet Schnee; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The diagnostic value of compression ultrasonography in patients with suspected recurrent deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Paolo Prandoni; Anthonie W A Lensing; Enrico Bernardi; Sabina Villalta; Paola Bagatella; Antonio Girolami
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 10.  A review on state-of-the-art data regarding safe early discharge following admission for pulmonary embolism: what do we know?

Authors:  Sérgio Nuno Craveiro Barra; Luís Paiva; Rui Providência; Andreia Fernandes; António Leitão Marques
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.882

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Reducing the hospital burden associated with the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Adam J Singer
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Clinical factors associated with massive pulmonary embolism and PE-related adverse clinical events.

Authors:  Praveen Hariharan; Nicholas Giordano; Alona Muzikansky; Christopher Kabrhel
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 4.164

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.