Literature DB >> 27822888

Does the Goh classification predict the outcome of vesico-vaginal fistula repair in the developed world?

Alice Beardmore-Gray1, Mahreen Pakzad2, Rizwan Hamid2, Jeremy Ockrim2, Tamsin Greenwell2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Goh Vesico-Vaginal Fistula (VVF) classification has prognostic value in VVF in the developing world (predominantly obstetric), with chances of successful closure decreasing from type 1 to type 4. We evaluated the prognostic value of the Goh classification for VVF of the developed world (predominantly iatrogenic).
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 63 consecutive patients with a mean age of 53 years (range 21-88) undergoing VVF repair under a single surgeon between 2006 and 2014. Demographic data, aetiology, operative data and final outcome (anatomical and functional) were recorded. Fistulae were classified according to Goh's system and outcomes correlated with this classification.
RESULTS: Successful closure at first repair was achieved in 90 % of type 1, 83 % of type 2, 100 % of type 3 and 100 % of type 4 fistulae. At second repair success was achieved in 100 % of all fistulae, irrespective of type. Continence post-anatomical closure was achieved in 100 % of type 1, 83 % of type 2, 83 % of type 3 and 75 % of type 4 fistulae. Fistula size and patient age were significant determinants of successful outcome.
CONCLUSION: Anatomical closure was obtained in 90 % of VVF of the developed world at first attempt, 100 % overall, and was not affected by the Goh classification. Continence post-anatomical closure of VVF was 94 % overall and deteriorated with increasing Goh classification type. The Goh classification has no prognostic value regarding anatomical closure in VVF of the developed world, but may be useful in determining the risk of post-anatomical closure urinary incontinence. Smaller fistula size and younger patient age are significant determinants of success.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Outcome; Repair; Surgery; Vesico-vaginal fistula

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27822888     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3186-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of two classification systems for vesicovaginal fistula.

Authors:  T Capes; E J Stanford; L Romanzi; Y Foma; E Moshier
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem.

Authors:  L Lewis Wall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Urogenital fistulas in women: 5-year experience at a single center.

Authors:  Onkar Singh; Shilpi Singh Gupta; Raj Kumar Mathur
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.510

4.  Vesico-vaginal fistulas in developing countries.

Authors:  P Hilton
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Risk factors for developing residual urinary incontinence after obstetric fistula repair.

Authors:  A Browning
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  A review of clinical pattern and outcome of vesicovaginal fistula.

Authors:  Ajenifuja Kayode Olusegun; Adepiti C Akinfolarin; Loto M Olabisi
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Urogenital fistulae: changing trends and personal experience of 46 cases.

Authors:  Ismail K El-Lamie
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-07-18

Review 8.  Obstetric fistula in low-income countries.

Authors:  Alice X Zheng; Frank W J Anderson
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.561

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Vesicovaginal fistulas: diagnosis and surgical management].

Authors:  P Marks; L A Kluth; I J Lang; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Anatomical and functional outcomes of non-obstetric urogenital fistula repair.

Authors:  Dmitry Pushkar; George Kasyan; Rustam Sheripbaev; Shukrat Mukhtarov; Luydmila Tikhonova
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.932

3.  Contemporary Outcomes of Surgery for Primary and Recurrent Genitourinary Fistulae in a Well-resourced Country.

Authors:  Nadir I Osman; Christopher J Hillary; Aziz Gulamhusein; Alison Downey; Richard D Inman; Christopher R Chapple
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-31

4.  The cost effectiveness of vaginal versus abdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistulae.

Authors:  Ross Warner; Alice Beardmore-Gray; Mahreen Pakzad; Rizwan Hamid; Jeremy Ockrim; Tamsin Greenwell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Vesicovaginal fistula: Review and recent trends.

Authors:  Shanmugasundaram Rajaian; Murugavaithianathan Pragatheeswarane; Arabind Panda
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.