Literature DB >> 2782271

Nifedipine, but not propranolol, improves left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with hypertension.

R M Zusman1, D M Christensen, E B Federman, T D Ruddy, D D Miller, C A Boucher.   

Abstract

The effects of nifedipine and propranolol on cardiac function both at rest and at peak exercise were compared in 22 hypertensive patients whose diastolic blood pressures remained in excess of 95 mm Hg despite diuretic therapy. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function at rest and at peak exercise during bicycle ergometry was assessed by first-pass radionuclide angiography using the Baird Scinticor before and after treatment with either nifedipine or propranolol. Both agents effectively reduced blood pressure in the supine and upright positions and at peak exercise. Nifedipine was associated with a significant increase in cardiac output and stroke volume at rest and at peak exercise, while propranolol decreased cardiac output at rest and at peak exercise. Systemic vascular resistance decreased with nifedipine treatment at rest and at peak exercise, but increased significantly with propranolol. Nifedipine increased ejection fraction in patients at rest and also increased maximal oxygen consumption at peak exercise, while propranolol decreased maximal oxygen consumption at peak exercise. At rest and at peak exercise, nifedipine increased peak filling rate, but time to peak filling rate was not affected by either drug. The fraction of total diastolic filling at the midpoint of diastole was significantly increased by nifedipine therapy at rest but was not affected by propranolol therapy. Nifedipine significantly decreased atrial filling volume while propranolol had no effect. Propranolol therapy did not result in any improvement in left ventricular function. In contrast, nifedipine improved left ventricular systolic and diastolic function at rest and peak exercise. Future selection of an antihypertensive agent should include consideration of the impact of therapy on left ventricular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2782271     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90747-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pulse wave mechanics revisited: relevance to therapy of cardiovascular disease with calcium antagonists.

Authors:  M F O'Rourke
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Therapeutic approaches to diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Rajesh Janardhanan; Akshay S Desai; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Sustained release nifedipine formulations. An appraisal of their current uses and prospective roles in the treatment of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disorders.

Authors:  D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Left ventricular diastolic function: physiology, methods of assessment, and clinical significance.

Authors:  J A Arrighi; R Soufer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Diastolic function in hypertension.

Authors:  R A Phillips; J A Diamond
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  [Pharmacologic importance of the combination atenolol/nifedipine in hypertensive patients].

Authors:  A Carré
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.