The Danish Inguinal Hernia database.

AIM OF DATABASE: To monitor and improve nation-wide surgical outcome after groin hernia repair based on scientific evidence-based surgical strategies for the national and international surgical community. STUDY POPULATION: Patients ≥18 years operated for groin hernia. MAIN VARIABLES: Type and size of hernia, primary or recurrent, type of surgical repair procedure, mesh and mesh fixation methods. DESCRIPTIVE DATA: According to the Danish National Health Act, surgeons are obliged to register all hernia repairs immediately after surgery (3 minute registration time). All institutions have continuous access to their own data stratified on individual surgeons. Registrations are based on a closed, protected Internet system requiring personal codes also identifying the operating institution. A national steering committee consisting of 13 voluntary and dedicated surgeons, 11 of whom are unpaid, handles the medical management of the database.
RESULTS: The Danish Inguinal Hernia Database comprises intraoperative data from >130,000 repairs (May 2015). A total of 49 peer-reviewed national and international publications have been published from the database (June 2015).
CONCLUSION: The Danish Inguinal Hernia Database is fully active monitoring surgical quality and contributes to the national and international surgical society to improve outcome after groin hernia repair.

Introduction

Groin hernia repair is the most frequently performed procedure in gastrointestinal surgery with ~12,000 operations per year in Denmark.1 The Danish Hernia Database consists of two databases: The Inguinal Hernia Database and The Ventral Hernia Database.

Both provide long-term monitoring on nation-wide surgical quality in unselected patients.

The Danish Inguinal Hernia Database reflects daily clinical life and as such offers big data with high external validity with emphasis on recurrence,1–7 optimizing surgical technique,2,5,6 and characterization of and intervention against chronic pain and sexual dysfunction.8–12 As a result, the database has achieved national and international attention due to the contribution of scientific evidence to improve surgical outcome after groin hernia repair. The main focus of the Danish Inguinal Hernia Database has been and still is postoperative risk of recurrence, optimal surgical techniques, chronic pain, sexual dysfunction, and convalescence.

History

Before the database was established, hernia recurrence was observed in >10% of patients. Within the first couple of years of registration in the database combined with national discussions to improve surgical technique, the reoperation rate was reduced to 2%–3%.1,2 The initiative to start the Danish Inguinal Hernia Database was launched in 1997 by a group of dedicated Danish hernia surgeons. From 1998, the database collected prospective nation-wide intraoperative data. From the very start, registrations were promoted by two annual national conferences and interim scientific steering group meetings. The focus of these meetings was and is optimization of surgical quality and techniques, and initiatives to avoid and treat chronic pain. Over the years, these two focus points have been the main drive for conducting scientific studies based on nation-wide database results and detailed follow-up substudies. From 1998 to 2006, the database employed a full-time research fellow and a part-time secretary.1

In the early years, the database was based on a one-page paper-form with brief structured questions (hospital/clinic, type of procedure, type of anesthesia, operative findings, and whether repair was performed for a primary or recurrent hernia). From 2006 onward, registrations have been managed via a closed Internet system. The surgeon registers intraoperative variables immediately after surgery. Data are validated against data from the National Hospital Administrative System and the National Patient Registry (data matching). This match is based on the use of a unique patient-specific social security number allowing patients to be followed from birth to death. The latter institutions collect prospective basic clinical information (procedure, diagnosis, complications, etc) from all hospital contacts in Denmark. Hospital costs are only covered if operations are coded and registered in these institutions. Since more than 95% of all operations in Denmark are conducted in public institutions, follow-up is close to 100%.

Aim

Since its establishment, the primary aim of the database has been to reduce the risk of hernia recurrence and to monitor and improve surgical outcome in a broader term after groin hernia repair.

Study population

All patients ≥18 years living in Denmark are eligible. The database comprises both primary and recurrent groin repair (lateral, medial, femoral, and obturator hernias). Data are restricted to intraoperative variables.

Main variables

The current version of the database registers surgical setting (private, public, repair during hospitalization, or same day surgery), type of anesthesia, and intraoperative hernia-specific data (Table 1).

Table 1

Data variables entered to Inguinal Hernia Database (January 1, 2015)

General	Anesthesia	Hernia characteristics	Procedure	Nerve identification
Date	Spinal	Right–left	Type of open repair	Identification of nerves
	Epidural	Size (EHS, 1–3 fingers)
Hospital	Local alone	Primary – recurrent	Type of endoscopic repair
		Number of recurrences
Surgeon	General	Direct–indirect	Type of mesh
		Pantaloon–sliding	Type of mesh fixation
Ambulatory		Femoral
Nonambulatory		Combination femoral-groin and other types of inguinal hernia
Elective/emergency

Notes: EHS (European Hernia Classification of defect size and type of hernia: 1, one finger; 2, two fingers; 3, three fingers or more and type of hernia: M, medial; L, lateral; F, femoral; O, other).

Abbreviation: EHS, European Hernia Society.

Compared with other hernia-specific databases such as the Swedish Hernia Database, the number of variables in the Danish database is smaller and is based on fewer scientific hypotheses.

Follow-up

Repeated registrations of subsequent inguinal hernia repair, with repair as a proxy for recurrence, allow lifelong monitoring of data on risk of recurrence.7 For other clinical outcomes (pain, convalescence, sexual dysfunction, etc), follow-up is performed by cross-matching cohort data from the Hernia Database with the national clinical databases, by mailed personal questionnaires, and by manual reviews of patients’ hospital records as described in detail elsewhere.7

Constant monitoring of specific quality indicators (reoperation rate, use of mesh, etc) allows analysis of variations and implementation of relevant actions if deemed necessary. During 2007 and 2008, we found that women who had Lichtenstein procedure performed had two to three times higher reoperation rate than men. As a consequence, the steering committee recommended that groin hernia in women should be treated laparoscopically resulting in a sharp decrease in reoperation rate the following years.

Results

The Danish Inguinal Hernia Database comprises intraoperative data from >130,000 repairs (May 2015). A total of 49 peer-reviewed national and international publications have been published, a full list can be found on www.herniedatabasen.dk. The database also publishes annual public reports on surgical quality on the Internet. The main results have contributed to both national and international reduction of the recurrence rate, reduced convalescence, increased understanding of what causes chronic pain, reduced risk of chronic pain and sexual dysfunction, improved surgical treatment of a recurrent groin hernia, and increased knowledge of risk factors for recurrence.1–15

During the first 8 years, 90%–95% of all groin hernia repairs in Denmark were registered in the database. From 2007, the structural control of the Inguinal Hernia Database was transferred to a government system. The change from a paper to an Internet-based system resulted in severe logistic and technical challenges. As a result, the national registration rate fell to ~75%. Due to a sustained effort by dedicated Danish surgeons and the steering committee, the registration rate has again reached 90% (May 2015). The same tendency was observed in the Danish Ventral Hernia Database.

No-mesh versus mesh-based inguinal hernia repair. Results from the database demonstrated that outcome in terms of recurrence was improved by using a mesh repair.

Laparoscopic or open surgical techniques. Results from the database demonstrated that recurrent laparoscopic repair was equal to open repair, that the risk of recurrence after open repair can be reduced by a laparoscopic repair and vice versa.

Limiting factors and intervention to reduce sick leave after inguinal hernia repair. Results from the database demonstrated that convalescence and sick leave was no more than median 2–3 days and that early ambulation (0–2 days postoperatively) was without increased risk of complications or risk of recurrence.

Optimal treatment of femoral hernia repair. Results from the database demonstrated femoral hernia repair should preferably be laparoscopic.

Characterization of and intervention against chronic pain and sexual dysfunction. Based on patients registered in the database, patients were followed and characterized for chronic pain (5%–10%) and surgical treatment improved chronic pain in 70% of the patients.

Administrative issues and funding

The Hernia Database has been funded by public appropriations since its establishment. From 1997 to 2007, all operational aspects of the database were handled by the steering committee. In 2007, Internet-based registration was introduced and in 2010 control of the economy was transferred to Regionernes Kliniske Kvalitetsudviklings Program. As a result, government organizations now control the majority of core structural tasks within the database. Over the last 5 years, there has been a drastic reduction of the funding available to the steering committee, that is, ~22,000 Euros covering fees, travel, and meeting expenses. Data analyses, quality reports, and scientific contributions are based on voluntary work.

The basis for all clinical databases in Denmark is the unique individual social security number. Unfortunately, this usage has been politically questioned in order to respect civil privacy by avoiding central health monitoring. If the database use of social security numbers is discontinued, it will destroy the unique potential of the clinical databases to improve the health of Danish citizens.

Conclusion

The Danish Inguinal Hernia Database is fully active and provides prospective long-term monitoring of surgical quality while contributing to the scientific surgical world and improving results after groin hernia repair. Future challenges will be education of hernia surgeons and continually improving all aspects of groin hernia repair with emphasis on recurrence and chronic pain.