Literature DB >> 27821812

Karyotypic complexity rather than chromosome 8 abnormalities aggravates the outcome of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with TP53 aberrations.

Gonzalo Blanco1,2,3, Anna Puiggros1,2, Panagiotis Baliakas4, Anastasia Athanasiadou5, MªDolores García-Malo6, Rosa Collado7, Aliki Xochelli4,8, María Rodríguez-Rivera1,2, Margarita Ortega9, Mª José Calasanz10, Elisa Luño11, MªTeresa Vargas12, Javier Grau13, Carolina Martínez-Laperche14, Alberto Valiente15, José Cervera16, Achilles Anagnostopoulos5, Eva Gimeno17, Eugènia Abella17, Evangelia Stalika8, Jesús Mª Hernández-Rivas18, Francisco José Ortuño6, Diego Robles19, Ana Ferrer1,2, David Ivars7, Marcos González18, Francesc Bosch9, Pau Abrisqueta9, Kostas Stamatopoulos4,5,8, Blanca Espinet1,2.   

Abstract

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) harboring TP53 aberrations (TP53abs; chromosome 17p deletion and/or TP53 mutation) exhibit an unfavorable clinical outcome. Chromosome 8 abnormalities, namely losses of 8p (8p-) and gains of 8q (8q+) have been suggested to aggravate the outcome of patients with TP53abs. However, the reported series were small, thus hindering definitive conclusions. To gain insight into this issue, we assessed a series of 101 CLL patients harboring TP53 disruption. The frequency of 8p- and 8q+ was 14.7% and 17.8% respectively. Both were associated with a significantly (P < 0.05) higher incidence of a complex karyotype (CK, ≥3 abnormalities) detected by chromosome banding analysis (CBA) compared to cases with normal 8p (N-8p) and 8q (N-8q), respectively. In univariate analysis for 10-year overall survival (OS), 8p- (P = 0.002), 8q+ (P = 0.012) and CK (P = 0.009) were associated with shorter OS. However, in multivariate analysis only CK (HR = 2.47, P = 0.027) maintained independent significance, being associated with a dismal outcome regardless of chromosome 8 abnormalities. In conclusion, our results highlight the association of chromosome 8 abnormalities with CK amongst CLL patients with TP53abs, while also revealing that CK can further aggravate the prognosis of this aggressive subgroup.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLL; TP53 aberrations; chromosome 8 abnormalities; complex karyotype; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27821812      PMCID: PMC5348364          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

The great majority (~80%) of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) carry one of the chromosomal aberrations routinely analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), namely deletions of 13q [del(13q)], 11q [del(11q)] and 17p [del(17p)] as well as trisomy 12. These aberrations are associated with distinct clinical outcome [1, 2]. In particular, del(17p) cases have the worst clinical outcome and the shortest overall survival (OS). Of note, it has been described that the remaining TP53 allele in del(17p) cases is generally mutated, although some CLL patients may harbor isolated TP53 mutations [3]. Taking into account both TP53 deletions and mutations, the rate of TP53 aberrant CLL cases peaks at 10% at diagnosis [4, 5] and may even exceed 40% at disease progression, mainly in patients previously treated with chemotherapy [6]. In addition, genomic complexity detected by chromosome banding analysis (CBA) or genomic microarrays also predicting rapid disease progression, is correlated to TP53 disruption in a significant proportion of patients [7-9]. TP53 aberrations (TP53abs, namely del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations) are associated with low response rates to standard chemoimmunotherapy [10]. Newly introduced signaling inhibitors represent a major advance for this group of patients, showing an improved overall response and progression-free survival even in refractory CLL cases [11-13]. Nonetheless, some CLL cases with TP53abs remain asymptomatic for extended periods of time, pointing to multiple associated genetic factors underlying the heterogeneity of this group of patients [14, 15]. Alterations of chromosome 8, and particularly losses of 8p (8p−, affecting several regions, from 8p11 to 8p23) and gains of 8q (8q+, usually involving 8q24, where MYC is located), have been suggested as new prognostic markers in CLL, even for patients harboring TP53abs. Although initial microarray studies identified chromosome 8 alterations in around 5% of the general CLL population, subsequent analyses detected an increased frequency in patients with del(17p), ranging from 28 to 80%; 8p− and 8q+ alterations were frequently concomitant and displayed an independent correlation with a shorter OS [16-21]. However, due to the small size of the evaluated cohorts, definitive conclusions could not be drawn regarding the actual impact of chromosome 8 abnormalities in CLL patients harboring TP53abs. In the present study we sought to obtain more insight into this issue by analyzing a series of 101 CLL patients with TP53abs, especially focusing on the potential prognostic value of 8p losses and 8q gains in this poor prognostic group of patients.

RESULTS

Patients

A total of 101 patients carrying TP53 abnormalities were included in this study: 92 cases with del(17p) and 9 additional cases with TP53 mutations. Demographic, clinical and biological data for the entire cohort are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients at diagnosis and last follow-up

Patients characteristics (n =101)
Age at diagnosis64 (42–87)
Male69 (68.3%)
Diagnosis
 MBL*6 (5.9%)
 CLL95 (94.1%)
Binet stage** (n =90)
 A57 (63.3%)
 B23 (25.6%)
 C10 (11.1%)
B-symptoms (n = 67)6 (9%)
Adenopathies (n = 71)37 (52.1%)
Splenomegaly (n =68)12 (17.6%)
Hepatomegaly (n =68)6 (8.8%)
Absolute white blood cell count (× 109/L) (n = 71)20 (3.8–372)
Absolute lymphocyte count (× 109/L) (n =68)15 (1–369)
Hemoglobin (g/dL) (n = 68)13.8 (7–18)
Platelets (×109/L) (n = 68)196 (2–356)
Lactate dehydrogenase (IU/L) (n = 64)335 (180–959)
Beta-2 microglobulin (mg/L) (n = 59)2.4 (1–8.4)
Unmutated IGHV (n =32)27 (84.4%)
Mutated NOTCH1 (n = 19)2 (10.5%)
Last follow-up
Treated patients (n =97)81 (83.5%)
Time to first treatment (months, 95% CI) (n = 96)23 (14–33)
Deaths66 (65.3%)
Overall survival (months, 95% CI) (n = 99)88 (67–108)
Follow-up (months)62 (0–201)

Values are given as median (range) or number (%). Hemoglobin is expressed as mean (range).

Although 6 patients were diagnosed as MBL (monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis), all of them had already progressed to CLL at the time of study.

Some centers only provided information regarding the Binet stage without the physical examination and the analytical parameters.

Values are given as median (range) or number (%). Hemoglobin is expressed as mean (range). Although 6 patients were diagnosed as MBL (monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis), all of them had already progressed to CLL at the time of study. Some centers only provided information regarding the Binet stage without the physical examination and the analytical parameters.

Chromosome 8 alterations

Overall, 23/101 cases (22.8%) displayed chromosome 8 alterations. In detail, 11/75 patients (14.7%) showed 8p−, while 18/101 cases (17.8%) had 8q+ with different alteration patterns (Table 2). In 6/75 patients (8%) both abnormalities were concomitant; baseline characteristics of patients with concomitant 8p− and 8q+ are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Four of the cases with concomitant 8p− and 8q+ also presented two altered clones with shared FISH patterns (Table 2).
Table 2

Chromosome banding analysis and FISH results in patients with alterations of chromosome 8

Chromosome Banding AnalysisFISH
IDKaryotype% del(17p)Chromosome 8 alteration
%FISH patterns*
146,XX,del(8)(p21),add(10)(q26),add(17)(p13),+2ac[5]/47,XX,+12,add(17)(p13),del(18)(q21),add(22)(q13)[3]80201O2G8p-
295751O2G
346,XX,add(6)(q24),add(14)(q32.3),i(17)(q10)[6]/46,XX[8]95751O2G
448,X,-X,-17,+4mar[13]/44,X,-X,del(6)(q23),-9,-13,-17,-21,+3mar[3]/46,XX[4]86501O2G
545,XY,-5,-9,-15,add(17)(p13),+18,-21,+2mar[13]/46,XY[37]70171O2G
644,X,-X,-6,der(13;15)(q10;q10),add(17)(p13),-20,+mar[13]/46,XX[7]9523/101O2G/1O3G8p- and 8q+
746,X,der(X),add(8)(p23),del(13)(q12q22),add(17)(p13)[11]/46,XX[13]10321O3G
895641O3G
945,XY,add(3)(q29),del(4)(q26q35),der(7)(1p36→1p32::7p22®7q32::15q22→15q26), -8,der(9),del(13)(q21q34),-15,-17,-18,+19, add(19)(p13),+2mar,+ac[17]/46,XY[3]7834/211O3G/2O3G
109566/311O3G/1O2G
1145,XY,add(6)(q22),del(11)(q11q22),-17[15]/44,XY,add(6)(q22),del(11)(q11q22),-17,-20,-22,+mar[2]8740/241O3G/1O2G
1246,XX,del(13)(q14q21)[2]/45,X,-X,del(13)(q14q21)[3]/45,XX,add(3)(q27),t(9;10)(q21;q22), +12,der(12)t(12;17)(q11;p11),del(13)(q14q21),-14,-17[7]/46,XX[8]70622O3G8q+
1346,XY[30]14882O3G
1446,XY[13]80822O3G
1547,XY,+12[8]/46,XY,add(1)(p34),add(2)(q34),t(11;22)(p14;q11),+12,-22[15]/46,XY[11]75182O3G
1645,XY,add(6)(p11),-22[13]/46,XY,i(17)(q10)[5]/46,XY[16]16572O3G
1745,XY,del(6)(q?),-9,add(14)(q32),-22,+mar[9]/46,XY,del(6)(q?),add(17)(p13),add(19)(q13)[21]55232O3G
1843,X,-X,del(2)(p15),+4,-7,add(11)(q21),-12,-13,add(14)(q32),add(17)(p11.2)[6]/46,XX[9]19142O3G
1970662O4G
2090812OnG
21#43-44,X,-Y,add(2)(q37),dic(3;11)(p21;q23),-8,add(8)(q24),add(16)(q24),-17,add(17)(p13), -18,+mar1,+mar2[cp18]/46,XY[11]68183G
22#45,XY,-15,add(17)(p13)[7]/45,XY,-15,add(17)(p13),add(21)(p13)[5]/ 44,XY,der(3)t(3;4)(p26;q21),-4,-15,add(17)(p13)[2]/46,XY[10]53153G
23#42,X,-Y,del(4)(p12p15),-8,add(8)(q24),-13,add(14)(p13),-15,-17,add(21)(p13),+mar[17]/46,XY[3]38773G

O: LPL (8p21) signal in orange, G: MYC (8q24) signal in green.

Only the MYC probe was analyzed.

O: LPL (8p21) signal in orange, G: MYC (8q24) signal in green. Only the MYC probe was analyzed. In 12/23 abnormal patients, chromosome 8 alterations were identified prior to treatment initiation either at diagnosis or within the following 12 months (de novo). In contrast, in the remaining 11 cases chromosome 8 analysis was performed later during the disease course (n = 10/11) or after treatment administration (n = 8/11) (median time to chromosome 8 analysis: 36 months, range: 9–132). In three of the latter cases, retrospective FISH analysis of stored diagnostic material disclosed the presence of chromosome 8 alterations without del(17p); in one of these three cases, a different clonal distribution of the abnormal chromosome 8 clones was observed between the two time points (Supplementary Figure S1). Altogether, chromosome 8 alterations could be considered de novo in 65.2% of cases (15/23). Unfortunately, no previous cytogenetic studies from the remaining patients (8/23) were available to elucidate the acquisition pattern of chromosome 8 and TP53abs. For the purpose of this study, two types of comparisons were established: patients with 8p– vs. those with normal 8p (N-8p) and patients with 8q+ vs. those with normal 8q (N-8q).

Other cytogenetic abnormalities

At the time of chromosome 8 analysis by FISH, 48.3% of patients presented del(13q), 12.9% trisomy 12 and 5.7% del(11q). Among the 66 patients with available CBA, 53 (80.3%) presented an abnormal karyotype and 31 (47%) showed a complex karyotype (CK). When comparing cases with 8p− or 8q+ versus those with N-8p or N-8q, respectively, no differences regarding del(13q), trisomy 12 and del(11q) frequencies were detected. Both the 8p− and the 8q+ groups carried a higher median percentage of 17p-deleted cells compared to cases with normal chromosome 8, although differences were only significant for the 8p− vs. N-8p comparison (87% vs. 50%, P = 0.001; 70% vs. 48%, P = 0.07). As for CBA, both the 8p− and the 8q+ group displayed a higher median number of chromosomal alterations (7 vs. 3, P = 0.041 and 6.5 vs. 2, P = 0.001 respectively), therefore displaying a higher frequency of CK (100% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.006 and 85.7% vs. 36.5%, P = 0.002 respectively) compared to N-8p and N-8q cases.

Demographic and baseline characteristics

When comparing 8p− vs. N-8p and 8q+ vs. N-8q cases the only statistically important differences concerned female prevalence (63.6% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.049) and lower hemoglobin levels (12.8 vs. 14 g/dL, P = 0.018) in the 8p− group.

Therapy

Overall, with a median follow up of 62 months (0–201), 81/97 cases (83.5%) had received treatment. Of note, in 34/93 cases (36.6%), therapy was administered prior to chromosome 8 testing. In 17/23 cases with 8p− and/or 8q+ (73.9%), these alterations were observed before treatment, whereas in the remaining six patients therapy-related acquisition could not be formally excluded as no relevant sample from the time of diagnosis was available for testing. Among treatment-naïve cases, both 8p− and 8q+ groups exhibited a shorter time to first treatment (TTFT; 11 vs. 45 months for 8p− vs. N-8p and 15 vs. 45 months for 8q+ vs. N-8q) although differences did not reach statistical significance.

Survival analysis

With a median follow-up of 62 months (range: 0–201), 35 patients (34.6%) remained alive. Ten-year survival analysis revealed a significant shorter median OS for both 8p− and 8q+ patients compared with N-8p and N-8q group respectively (41 vs. 94 months; P = 0.002 and 38 vs. 92 months; P = 0.012 respectively) (Figure 1, Table 3). Interestingly, even though the number of cases with concomitant 8p− and 8q+ was low (n = 6), they exhibited a significant shorter OS compared to patients with isolated chromosome 8 alterations (26 vs. 88 months, P = 0.016). An elevated percentage of 17p-deleted cells also was related to inferior outcome, with the optimal cut-off being ≥80% of deleted cells (P < 0.001).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier plots for ten-year OS in patients carrying (A) 8p−, (B) 8q+, (C) CK, (D) ≥80% 17p deleted cells and (E) CK with 8q+ or N-8q

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analysis on ten-year overall survival

VariableUnivariateMultivariate
Median OS (95% CI) in monthsP-valueHazard ratio (95% CI)P-value
Loss of 8p by FISH8p−41 (24–58)0.002NANA
N-8p94 (60–127)
Gain of 8q by FISH8q+38 (0–85)0.0121.23 (0.52–2.90)0.642
N-8q92 (84–100)
Complex karyotypeYes62 (40–83)0.0092.47 (1.11–5.49)0.027
NoNR
Percentage of cells with 17p deletion≥ 80%41 (21–61)< 0.0012.21 (1.02–4.80)0.046
< 80%94 (60–129)

NA, not assessed; NR, not reached.

NA, not assessed; NR, not reached. Regarding chromosomal abnormalities detected by CBA, patients with CK exhibited a shorter OS (P = 0.009), which was independent of the presence or absence of 8q+ (48 vs. 62 months, P = 0.538) (Figure 1). Similar results were obtained when cases analyzed after treatment were excluded from the statistical analysis (Supplementary Figure S2). On multivariate analysis including 8q+, ≥ 80% of 17p-deleted cells and CK only ≥ 80% of 17p-deleted cells (P = 0.046, HR = 2.2) and CK (P = 0.027, HR = 2.5) retained independent significance (Table 3). Multivariate analysis including 8p− cases could not be performed due to the low number of patients with available data from both CBA and 8p status.

DISCUSSION

Mounting evidence suggests that within CLL patients with TP53abs additional genetic features may influence the clinical outcome [17, 22, 23]. More specifically, alterations in chromosome 8 are more frequently detected in CLL patients with TP53abs and have been proposed as potentially prognostic markers in this aggressive group. Nevertheless, large studies focusing on the characterization and clinical outcome of this subset of patients are lacking. In order to address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed 101 CLL patients with TP53abs from our collaborating institutions. The frequency of 8p− was 14.7%, whereas 8q+ was detected in 17.8% of patients, being concomitant in 30% of cases with chromosome 8 alterations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of patients with TP53abs confirming the enrichment of chromosome 8 abnormalities in this disease subgroup. The frequencies reported herein are lower than those in previous studies, which, however, concerned significantly smaller cohorts, thus raising the possibility of selection bias [17, 19, 20]. The high percentage of de novo chromosome 8 alterations reported here suggests that 8p− and 8q+ can occur early in the course of the disease. This is in agreement with earlier reports of 8p− and 8q+ in treatment-naïve patients [20, 21]. Indeed, subsequent whole-exome sequencing studies analyzing clonal heterogeneity also suggested 8p− and 8q+ as early events during CLL development, whereas TP53 aberrations seem to appear later in the course of the disease [24]. Regarding the clinical characteristics of patients with alterations in chromosome 8 at diagnosis, no significant differences could be identified between groups except for gender distribution and hemoglobin levels. As for the genetic characteristics, we found a higher percentage of 17p-deleted nuclei in patients with 8p− or 8q+. Furthermore, in accordance with previous reports, a higher rate of CK was associated with both chromosome 8 abnormalities (8p− and 8q+) [25, 26]. Concerning clinical outcome, even though both 8p− and 8q+ exhibited a shorter TTFT, differences did not reach statistical significance. Nonetheless, a decreased OS was observed for both 8p− and 8q+, with concomitant 8p− and 8q+ cases exhibiting the worst outcome. Concerning patients with isolated 8p− or 8q+, given the small number of cases, we could not statistically assess their potential impact on survival. Our findings indicate that co-existence of 8p− and 8q+ may have a potential clinical impact in CLL and should be better evaluated in future research. However, further studies in larger patient cohorts are needed to discern the clinical consequences of isolated 8p− or 8q+. Karyotypic complexity has been reported to be significantly associated with TP53abs [7, 25, 27] and to have a negative impact on survival even within this aggressive subset of patients [8, 23, 27]. Our present study confirms and significantly extends previous reports highlighting the impact of genetic instability in the pathogenesis of the disease. Indeed, although 89% of cases with 8p− and/or 8q+ showed a CK, in the multivariate analysis only karyotypic complexity and the percentage of 17p-deleted nuclei maintained the statistical significance. This finding suggests that CK rather than chromosome 8 alterations is responsible for the dismal clinical evolution of these patients. Chromosome 8 alterations could reflect underlying genomic instability leading to karyotypic complexity and could suggest the implication of different genes such as MYC in 8q+ cases and tumor suppressors such as TNFRSF10A/B (8p21) in 8p− cases [20, 28]. Notably, however, almost 40% of cases with CK did not show 8p− or 8q+ but displayed the same poor outcome as those with chromosome 8 alterations and CK. In conclusion, our results highlight the association of chromosome 8 abnormalities with CK amongst CLL patients with TP53abs, while also revealing that CK can further aggravate the prognosis of this aggressive subgroup. These findings further underscore the relevance of chromosome banding analysis, which has the potential to refine prognosis even amongst cases with altered TP53.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient selection

For the purpose of this study, we evaluated CLL patients with TP53abs and available Carnoy fixed tumoral cells from 17 collaborating institutions in Spain and Greece (Supplementary Figure S3). All patients met the iwCLL diagnostic criteria [29]. A total of 101 patients carrying TP53 abnormalities were identified: 92 cases with del(17p) detected by FISH and 9 additional cases with TP53 mutations identified by Sanger sequencing. Of note, six patients had been diagnosed of CLL-like monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL) but had already progressed to CLL at the time of the study. Treatment initiation and response assessment followed standard criteria [29, 30]. The study was performed in accordance with national and international guidelines (Professional Code of Conduct, Declaration of Helsinki) and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital del Mar, Barcelona (2013/5093/I).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis

Chromosome 8 alterations were assessed in the same Carnoy fixed tumoral cells (peripheral blood or bone marrow) which were used for the detection of TP53abs. Several samples were obtained from Parc de Salut MAR Biobank (MARBiobanc), Barcelona. The median time from diagnosis to study of chromosome 8 abnormalities was 15 months (range: 0–145) and 36.6% of the patients had received treatment prior to the analysis. Commercial FISH probes covering LPL (8p21) and MYC (8q24) genes (Abbott Molecular, Abbott Park, IL) were used in 75 and 101 patients, respectively. Moreover, data from routine FISH (D13S319, CEP12 and ATM) and CBA (72 h + TPA and/or CpG + IL2) were also available in 91 and 66 cases, respectively. Complex karyotypes (CK) were defined as the presence of three or more numerical/structural chromosomal abnormalities.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were employed for discrete variables, while comparisons of continuous variables were assessed by the Mann–Whitney test. TTFT was defined as the time from diagnosis to the beginning of treatment and OS as the time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Both parameters were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plots within the first ten years of follow-up. The effect of different covariates was assessed employing the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis according to the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the maintenance of their independent predictive value. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v.22 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The optimal cut-off value for the percentage of cells harboring del(17p) was assessed using Maximally Selected Rank Statistics in R.
  30 in total

1.  Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to FISH and cytogenetics in prognostic evaluation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  D P O'Malley; C Giudice; A S Chang; D Chang; T S Barry; M K Hibbard; R Chen; S-T Chen
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  TP53 mutation profile in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: evidence for a disease specific profile from a comprehensive analysis of 268 mutations.

Authors:  T Zenz; D Vollmer; M Trbusek; J Smardova; A Benner; T Soussi; H Helfrich; M Heuberger; P Hoth; M Fuge; T Denzel; S Häbe; J Malcikova; P Kuglik; S Truong; N Patten; L Wu; D Oscier; R Ibbotson; A Gardiner; I Tracy; K Lin; A Pettitt; S Pospisilova; J Mayer; M Hallek; H Döhner; S Stilgenbauer
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Comprehensive genetic characterization of CLL: a study on 506 cases analysed with chromosome banding analysis, interphase FISH, IgV(H) status and immunophenotyping.

Authors:  C Haferlach; F Dicker; S Schnittger; W Kern; T Haferlach
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Characterization of 8p21.3 chromosomal deletions in B-cell lymphoma: TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 as candidate dosage-dependent tumor suppressor genes.

Authors:  Fanny Rubio-Moscardo; David Blesa; Cinta Mestre; Reiner Siebert; Theo Balasas; Adalberto Benito; Andreas Rosenwald; Joan Climent; Jose I Martinez; Markus Schilhabel; E Lorraine Karran; Stefan Gesk; Manel Esteller; Ronald deLeeuw; Louis M Staudt; Jose Luis Fernandez-Luna; Daniel Pinkel; Martin J S Dyer; Jose A Martinez-Climent
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Genomic imbalance defines three prognostic groups for risk stratification of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Jane Houldsworth; Asha Guttapalli; Venkata Thodima; Xiao Jie Yan; Geetu Mendiratta; Tania Zielonka; Gouri Nanjangud; Weiyi Chen; Sujata Patil; Anthony Mato; Jennifer R Brown; Kanti Rai; Nicholas Chiorazzi; R S K Chaganti
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-11-12

6.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines.

Authors:  Michael Hallek; Bruce D Cheson; Daniel Catovsky; Federico Caligaris-Cappio; Guillaume Dighiero; Hartmut Döhner; Peter Hillmen; Michael J Keating; Emili Montserrat; Kanti R Rai; Thomas J Kipps
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Clinical impact of clonal and subclonal TP53, SF3B1, BIRC3, NOTCH1, and ATM mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Ferran Nadeu; Julio Delgado; Cristina Royo; Tycho Baumann; Tatjana Stankovic; Magda Pinyol; Pedro Jares; Alba Navarro; David Martín-García; Sílvia Beà; Itziar Salaverria; Ceri Oldreive; Marta Aymerich; Helena Suárez-Cisneros; Maria Rozman; Neus Villamor; Dolors Colomer; Armando López-Guillermo; Marcos González; Miguel Alcoceba; Maria José Terol; Enrique Colado; Xose S Puente; Carlos López-Otín; Anna Enjuanes; Elías Campo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Genomic complexity and IGHV mutational status are key predictors of outcome of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with TP53 disruption.

Authors:  Julio Delgado; Itziar Salaverria; Tycho Baumann; Alejandra Martínez-Trillos; Eriong Lee; Laura Jiménez; Alba Navarro; Cristina Royo; Rodrigo Santacruz; Cristina López; Angel R Payer; Enrique Colado; Marcos González; Lluís Armengol; Dolors Colomer; Magda Pinyol; Neus Villamor; Marta Aymerich; Ana Carrió; Dolors Costa; Guillem Clot; Eva Giné; Armando López-Guillermo; Elías Campo; Sílvia Beà
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Mutations driving CLL and their evolution in progression and relapse.

Authors:  Dan A Landau; Eugen Tausch; Amaro N Taylor-Weiner; Chip Stewart; Johannes G Reiter; Jasmin Bahlo; Sandra Kluth; Ivana Bozic; Mike Lawrence; Sebastian Böttcher; Scott L Carter; Kristian Cibulskis; Daniel Mertens; Carrie L Sougnez; Mara Rosenberg; Julian M Hess; Jennifer Edelmann; Sabrina Kless; Michael Kneba; Matthias Ritgen; Anna Fink; Kirsten Fischer; Stacey Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Martin A Nowak; Hartmut Döhner; Michael Hallek; Donna Neuberg; Gad Getz; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Dohner fluorescence in situ hybridization prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): the CLL Research Consortium experience.

Authors:  Daniel L Van Dyke; Lillian Werner; Laura Z Rassenti; Donna Neuberg; Emanuella Ghia; Nyla A Heerema; Paola Dal Cin; Marie Dell Aquila; Chandrika Sreekantaiah; Andrew W Greaves; Thomas J Kipps; Neil E Kay
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  13 in total

1.  Clinical Identification of Oncogenic Drivers and Copy-Number Alterations in Pituitary Tumors.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Noah F Greenwald; Shakti H Ramkissoon; Malak Abedalthagafi; Shannon M Coy; Keith L Ligon; Yu Mei; Laura MacConaill; Matt Ducar; Le Min; Sandro Santagata; Ursula B Kaiser; Rameen Beroukhim; Edward R Laws; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.736

2.  Refined karyotype-based prognostic stratification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with a low- and very-low-risk genetic profile.

Authors:  I Del Giudice; G M Rigolin; S Raponi; L Cafforio; C Ilari; J Wang; M Bordyuh; A Piciocchi; M Marinelli; M Nanni; S Tavolaro; M Filetti; A Bardi; E Tammiso; E Volta; M Negrini; E Saccenti; F R Mauro; D Rossi; G Gaidano; A Guarini; R Rabadan; A Cuneo; R Foà
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Duplication of 8q24 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Cytogenetic and Molecular Biologic Analysis of MYC Aberrations.

Authors:  Eva Ondroušková; Michaela Bohúnová; Kristýna Závacká; Patrik Čech; Petra Šmuhařová; Miroslav Boudný; Martina Oršulová; Anna Panovská; Lenka Radová; Michael Doubek; Karla Plevová; Marie Jarošová
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Cytogenetic complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: definitions, associations, and clinical impact.

Authors:  Panagiotis Baliakas; Sabine Jeromin; Michalis Iskas; Anna Puiggros; Karla Plevova; Florence Nguyen-Khac; Zadie Davis; Gian Matteo Rigolin; Andrea Visentin; Aliki Xochelli; Julio Delgado; Fanny Baran-Marszak; Evangelia Stalika; Pau Abrisqueta; Kristina Durechova; George Papaioannou; Virginie Eclache; Maria Dimou; Theodoros Iliakis; Rosa Collado; Michael Doubek; M Jose Calasanz; Neus Ruiz-Xiville; Carolina Moreno; Marie Jarosova; Alexander C Leeksma; Panayiotis Panayiotidis; Helena Podgornik; Florence Cymbalista; Achilles Anagnostopoulos; Livio Trentin; Niki Stavroyianni; Fred Davi; Paolo Ghia; Arnon P Kater; Antonio Cuneo; Sarka Pospisilova; Blanca Espinet; Anastasia Athanasiadou; David Oscier; Claudia Haferlach; Kostas Stamatopoulos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  The combination of complex karyotype subtypes and IGHV mutational status identifies new prognostic and predictive groups in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Authors:  Andrea Visentin; Laura Bonaldi; Gian Matteo Rigolin; Francesca Romana Mauro; Annalisa Martines; Federica Frezzato; Silvia Imbergamo; Edoardo Scomazzon; Stefano Pravato; Maria Antonella Bardi; Maurizio Cavallari; Eleonora Volta; Francesco Cavazzini; Maurizio Nanni; Ilaria Del Giudice; Monica Facco; Anna Guarini; Gianpietro Semenzato; Robin Foà; Antonio Cuneo; Livio Trentin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  New Recurrent Structural Aberrations in the Genome of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Based on Exome-Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Adrián Mosquera Orgueira; Beatriz Antelo Rodríguez; José Ángel Díaz Arias; Marta Sonia González Pérez; José Luis Bello López
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  "Double-Hit" Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Involving the TP53 and MYC Genes.

Authors:  Florence Nguyen-Khac
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Biological significance and prognostic/predictive impact of complex karyotype in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Maurizio Cavallari; Francesco Cavazzini; Antonio Cuneo; Gian Matteo Rigolin; Antonella Bardi; Eleonora Volta; Aurora Melandri; Elisa Tammiso; Elena Saccenti; Enrico Lista; Francesca Maria Quaglia; Antonio Urso; Michele Laudisi; Elisa Menotti; Luca Formigaro; Melissa Dabusti; Maria Ciccone; Paolo Tomasi; Massimo Negrini
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-09-28

9.  Genomic arrays identify high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia with genomic complexity: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Alexander C Leeksma; Panagiotis Baliakas; Theodoros Moysiadis; Anna Puiggros; Karla Plevova; Anne-Marie Van der Kevie-Kersemaekers; Hidde Posthuma; Ana E Rodriguez-Vicente; Anh Nhi Tran; Gisela Barbany; Larry Mansouri; Rebeqa Gunnarsson; Helen Parker; Eva Van den Berg; Mar Bellido; Zadie Davis; Meaghan Wall; Ilaria Scarpelli; Anders Österborg; Lotta Hansson; Marie Jarosova; Paolo Ghia; Pino Poddighe; Blanca Espinet; Sarka Pospisilova; Constantine Tam; Loïc Ysebaert; Florence Nguyen-Khac; David Oscier; Claudia Haferlach; Jacqueline Schoumans; Marian Stevens-Kroef; Eric Eldering; Kostas Stamatopoulos; Richard Rosenquist; Jonathan C Strefford; Clemens Mellink; Arnon P Kater
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  The Difficult-to-Treat del 17 p Patient-A Case Report in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Moldovianu; Ana Manuela Crisan; Zsofia Varady; Daniel Coriu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.