Literature DB >> 27821397

Medication reconciliation interventions in ambulatory care: A scoping review.

Lisa McCarthy1, Xinru Wendy Su2, Natalie Crown2, Jennifer Turple3, Thomas E R Brown4, Kate Walsh5, Jessica John4, Paula Rochon6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The published literature on medication reconciliation (MR) interventions, outcomes, and facilitators in ambulatory care settings is reviewed.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to characterize ambulatory care-based MR research in terms of study design, elements of interventions, and outcomes examined. English-language articles on comparative studies of MR programs targeting adults in ambulatory care settings were identified using data sources including MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. For each study, steps undertaken in the MR process were extracted. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) taxonomy was used to classify types of interventions; taxonomies for reported outcomes and factors facilitating implementation of MR initiatives were developed by the authors.
RESULTS: From among 2062 publications screened, 15 were included in the review. In 13 studies, multiple data sources were used to compile a "best possible medication history" (BPMH); however, the BPMH was shared with external healthcare providers in only 4 studies and with patients in only 5 studies. Most reported MR interventions were classified into two EPOC domains: professional (predominantly educational outreach visits and patient reminders) and organizational (predominantly provider-oriented interventions). Process outcomes were reported in 12 studies, with correct performance of MR being the most commonly evaluated process outcome, and 9 studies identified factors that facilitated MR implementation.
CONCLUSION: Few studies have examined clinical outcomes of MR in ambulatory care settings, with the majority of pertinent reports focusing instead on process outcomes. Facilitators of successful MR interventions have been identified at the patient, staff, and clinic setting levels.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27821397     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp150916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  5 in total

1.  The Impact of Completing Medication Reconciliation and Depression Treatment History in an Outpatient Depression Clinic.

Authors:  Sarah J Choi; Roberta Storey; Sagar V Parikh; Jolene R Bostwick
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2019-02-15

2.  A Critical Analysis of the Specific Pharmacist Interventions and Risk Assessments During the 12-Month TRANSAFE Rx Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Haley M Gonzales; James N Fleming; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Maria Aurora Posadas Salas; John W McGillicuddy; David J Taber
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.463

3.  Evaluation of Multimedia Medication Reconciliation Software: A Randomized Controlled, Single-Blind Trial to Measure Diagnostic Accuracy for Discrepancy Detection.

Authors:  Blake J Lesselroth; Kathleen Adams; Victoria L Church; Stephanie Tallett; Yelizaveta Russ; Jack Wiedrick; Christopher Forsberg; David A Dorr
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  A Pharmacist-Driven Intervention Designed to Improve Medication Accuracy in the Outpatient Kidney Transplant Setting.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Cohen; Danielle McKimmy; Anna Cerilli; Sanjay Kulkarni
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2020-11-25

5.  Pharmacist-Led Collaborative Medication Management for the Elderly with Chronic Kidney Disease and Polypharmacy.

Authors:  A Jeong Kim; Hayeon Lee; Eun-Jeong Shin; Eun-Jung Cho; Yoon Sook Cho; Hajeong Lee; Ju-Yeun Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.