| Literature DB >> 27821224 |
G G Miguel-Pacheco1, L D Curtain2, C Rutland1, L Knott3, S T Norman4, N J Phillips3, V E A Perry1.
Abstract
Genetically similar nulliparous Polled Hereford heifers from a closed pedigree herd were used to evaluate the effects of dietary protein during the first and second trimester of gestation upon foetal, placental and postnatal growth. Heifers were randomly allocated into two groups at 35 days after artificial insemination (35 days post conception (dpc)) to a single bull and fed high (15.7% CP) or low (5.9% CP) protein in the first trimester (T1). At 90 dpc, half of each nutritional treatment group changed to a high- or low-protein diet for the second trimester until 180 dpc (T2). High protein intake in the second trimester increased birth weight in females (P=0.05), but there was no effect of treatment upon birth weight when taken over both sexes. Biparietal diameter was significantly increased by high protein in the second trimester with the effect being greater in the female (P=0.02), but also significant overall (P=0.05). Placental weight was positively correlated with birth weight, fibroblast volume and relative blood vessel volume (P<0.05). Placental fibroblast density was increased and trophoblast volume decreased in the high-protein first trimester treatment group (P<0.05). There was a trend for placental weight to be increased by high protein in the second trimester (P=0.06). Calves from heifers fed the high-protein treatment in the second trimester weighed significantly more on all occasions preweaning (at 1 month (P=0.0004), 2 months (P=0.006), 3 months (P=0.002), 4 months (P=0.01), 5 months (P=0.03), 6 months (P=0.001)), and grew at a faster rate over the 6-month period. By 6 months of age, the calves from heifers fed high nutrition in the second trimester weighed 33 kg heavier than those fed the low diet in the second trimester. These results suggest that dietary protein in early pregnancy alters the development of the bovine placenta and calf growth to weaning.Entities:
Keywords: bovine; calf growth; foetal programming; gestation diet
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27821224 PMCID: PMC5441368 DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116002330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animal ISSN: 1751-7311 Impact factor: 3.240
Nutrient content of dietary rations fed to dams during each trimester of gestation (T1=36 to 90 dpc, T2=90 to 180 dpc or T3=181 to term) by treatment (high or low)
| T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (36 to 90) | (90 to 180) | 181 to term | |||
| Feed sources | High | Low | High | Low | All cows |
| Hay (kg) | – | 3.74 | – | 4.00 | – |
| Pasture (kg) | 5.72 | – | 6.00 | – | 7.20 |
| Sorghum (kg) | – | 2.61 | – | 2.61 | – |
| Copra meal (kg) | 1.80 | – | 1.80 | – | – |
| Calcium (g/kg) | 1.10 | 2.60 | 1.10 | 2.60 | 1.10 |
| Phosphorus (g/kg) | 9.20 | 5.20 | 9.20 | 5.20 | 9.20 |
| DMI total | 7.52 | 6.35 | 7.80 | 6.61 | 7.20 |
| Energy intake (MJ) | 70.50 | 57.50 | 72.20 | 64.00 | 63.40 |
| Energy (%NRC | 100.00 | 90.00 | 103.00 | 92.00 | 101.00 |
| CP (kg) | 1.18 | 0.38 | 1.22 | 0.40 | 0.99 |
| CP (%) | 15.70 | 5.98 | 15.64 | 6.05 | 13.70 |
| CP (%NRC) | 174.00 | 66.00 | 179.00 | 70.00 | 125.00 |
Data are presented on an as-fed dry matter (DM) basis per heifer per day.
Estimates of DMI from pasture and hay were calculated based upon the National Research Council (NRC) energy requirements for replacement Bos taurus pregnant heifers with a mature weight of 500 kg and a calf birth weight of 32 kg. As the sorghum and copra meal energy content were known (12 and 11.2 MJ/kg DM, respectively) and the heifers on the low-protein diet averaged 340 kg with a rate of gain of 0.8 kg during the first trimester, the DMI of pasture and hay was calculated based upon the energy requirement sufficient to sustain this rate of gain. Similar DMI estimations were completed in the second and third trimesters based on the rate of gain in each treatment group.
NRC comparison to ration to NRC (1996) recommended nutrient requirements for pregnant yearling Bos taurus replacement heifers with calf weight of 32 kg.
Placental gross morphometry and calf measurements at birth by treatment group
| First trimester | High protein | Low protein | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second trimester | High | Low | High | Low | ||||
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | |
| Placental gross morphometry | ||||||||
| Number of cotyledons | 78.0 | ±6.9 | 98.5 | ±18.5 | 78.5 | ±7.3 | 70.3 | ±8.2 |
| Cotyledon wet weight (g) | 1493.3 | ±82.7 | 1308.5 | ±91.5 | 1544.3 | ±165.7 | 1335.0 | ±163.5 |
| Cotyledon dry weight (g) | 124.3 | ±17.1 | 88.8 | ±22.7 | 128.4 | ±20.5 | 130.6 | ±12.4 |
| Placental wet weight (g) | 4923.8 | ±356.5 | 3935.0 | ±585.0 | 4247.0 | ±367.9 | 3405.5 | ±561.2 |
| Calves measurements | ||||||||
| Birth weight | 36.8 | ±0.9 | 31.0 | ±1.8 | 36.7 | ±2.3 | 36.0 | ±1.9 |
| BPD | 10.8b | ±0.1 | 10.5a | ±0.2 | 10.7b | ±0.2 | 10.3a | ±0.2 |
BPD=biparietal diameter.
a,bDifferent alphabetic superscripts denote mean values which are significantly different from each other (P<0.05).
The observed increase in placental weight by second trimester high-protein treatment was below this level at P=0.06.
Cellular composition of bovine placenta by treatment group
| First trimester | High protein | Low protein | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second trimester | High | Low | High | Low | ||||
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | |
| Cellular composition of bovine placenta | ||||||||
| Surface density of trophectoderm (cm-1) | 202.8 | ±7.5 | 205.1 | ±17.4 | 202.5 | ±15.06 | 210.4 | ±25.5 |
| Barrier thickness of trophectoderm (cm) | 0.233 | ±0.015 | 0.247 | ±0.014 | 0.237 | ±0.015 | 0.262 | ±0.042 |
| Volume densities (cm0) | ||||||||
| Trophectoderm | 0.485 | ±0.026 | 0.511 | ±0.029 | 0.473 | ±0.027 | 0.526 | ±0.023 |
| Matrix | 0.398 | ±0.021 | 0.381 | ±0.012 | 0.358 | ±0.042 | 0.381 | ±0.031 |
| Fibroblast | 0.038a | ±0.004 | 0.035a | ±0.002 | 0.031b | ±0.002 | 0.025b | ±0.004 |
| Blood vessel volume density | 0.092 | ±0.015 | 0.087 | ±0.023 | 0.091 | ±0.009 | 0.066 | ±0.016 |
| Relative volume of each component (cm3) | ||||||||
| Trophectoderm volume | 653.9a | ±73.4 | 636.6a | ±7.4 | 723.5b | ±68.6 | 709.02b | ±112.9 |
| Matrix volume | 597.7 | ±52.6 | 484.2 | ±43.6 | 574.0 | ±106.4 | 497.3 | ±41.57 |
| Fibroblast volume | 57.04 | ±7.69 | 48.41 | ±3.38 | 47.61 | ±6.37 | 32.05 | ±5.64 |
| Blood vessel volume | 141.3 | ±26.9 | 141.3 | ±37.9 | 146.6 | ±31.3 | 95.3 | ±32.2 |
Values are unadjusted mean and ±SEM of the cellular composition of bovine placenta by treatment group. Volume densities are a proportion, dimensionless numbers as they are a ratio of two numbers=cm0; Surface density measures surface area per volume or weight of tissue (g of cotyledon) (cm2/cm3)=cm−1; Barrier thickness of trophectoderm – linear measurement=cm; relative volume of each component assumes 1 g of placenta occupies 1 cm3=cm3.
a,bDifferent alphabetic superscripts denote mean values that are significantly different (P<0.05) from each other.
Correlation coefficients (r) between birth weight and placental parameters
| Variables |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Placental parameters | ||
| Placental weight | 0.52 | 0.03 |
| CWW | 0.65 | 0.003 |
| CDW | 0.43 | 0.07 |
| Cotyledon number | 0.46 | 0.05 |
| Cellular placental parameters | ||
| Trophectoderm relative volume | 0.392 | Ns |
| Matrix relative volume | 0.601 | 0.008 |
| Fibroblast relative volume | 0.331 | Ns |
| Blood vessel relative volume | 0.518 | 0.03 |
| Trophectoderm volume density | −0.242 | Ns |
| Matrix volume density | 0.249 | Ns |
| Fibroblast volume density | −0.022 | Ns |
| Blood vessel volume density | 0.439 | 0.06 |
| Surface density of the trophectoderm | −0.396 | Ns |
| Barrier thickness of trophectoderm | 0.114 | Ns |
CWW=cotyledon wet weight; CDW=cotyledon dry weight; Ns=not significant.
Figure 1Mean and ±SEM of calf body weight from birth (0 months) until 6 months of age by treatment during the second trimester. Levels of significance indicated by *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001, respectively.
Anal fat fold (AFFT) measurement and body composition of calves at 6 months of age according to treatment groupEquations used to calculate the body composition were taken from Johnson (1994). Different alphabetic superscripts denote group mean values that are statistically significantly different from each other, a, b and c for P<0.05
| First trimester | High protein | Low protein | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second trimester | High | Low | High | Low | ||||||||
| Mean | SEM | CI | Mean | SEM | CI | Mean | SEM | CI | Mean | SEM | CI | |
| Fat measurements | ||||||||||||
| AFFT (mm) | 22.30 | ±1.52 | 18.42 to 26.24 | 35.75 | ±1.11 | 32.22 to 39.28 | 26.28 | ±2.16 | 21.01 to 31.56 | 20.00 | ±1.41 | 15.49 to 24.50 |
| Body composition | ||||||||||||
| Muscle % (1) | 58.71ab | ±0.76 | 56.75 to 60.68 | 57.00a | ±0.88 | 54.19 to 59.81 | 59.43ab | ±0.55 | 58.08 to 60.77 | 58.92b | ±0.62 | 56.93 to 60.91 |
| Fat % (2) | 24.42ab | ±1.06 | 21.69 to 27.15 | 26.90a | ±1.25 | 22.91 to 30.89 | 23.50ab | ±0.77 | 21.62 to 25.38 | 24.00b | ±0.85 | 21.29 to 26.70 |
| Bone % (3) | 14.03ab | ±0.13 | 13.71 to 14.36 | 13.60a | ±0.16 | 13.09 to 14.10 | 14.08ab | ±0.12 | 13.78 to 14.39 | 14.55b | ±0.87 | 14.27 to 14.82 |
Equations used to calculate the body composition were taken from Johnson (1994).
(1)=72.92 (if males)/69.97(if females)−0.090×AFFT−0.027×ELW; (2)=4.37(if male)/8.32 (if female)+0.132×AFFT+0.038×ELW; (3)=18.81−0.029×AFFT−0.010×ELW.
a,b,cDifferent alphabetic superscripts denote mean values that are statistically significantly different from each other for P<0.05.