Literature DB >> 27821190

INFORMATION ABOUT METHODS RECEIVED BY CONTRACEPTIVE USERS IN INDIA.

Anrudh K Jain1.   

Abstract

Very little is known, at national and state levels, about how much information women in India are receiving about the method of contraception they are using. The purpose of this study was to fill this gap in knowledge. A Method Information Index (MII) was calculated from the responses of women who started using a modern contraceptive method five years prior to interview, and who were still using it at the time of interview, in the third National Family Health Survey conducted in India in 2005-06. The women were asked whether at the time they initiated contraceptive use they were told about other methods they could use, the side-effects of their selected method and what to do if they experienced these side-effects. The MII values (percentages of women who responded 'yes' to all three questions) were calculated for each category of women's characteristics to show the relationship between MII and each characteristic. Mixed-effect logistic regression models were used to assess the independent effect of each variable after controlling for the effects of other variables on MII. The results indicate that contraceptive users in India in 2005-06 were receiving very little information about the method they were using: only 15.6% of contraceptive users reported receiving information on all three items. This low level was prevalent across different socioeconomic strata and across all the major states. There were a few exceptions, but the level was still quite low. Clearly, there is plenty of scope to improve the content of information exchanged between service providers and clients in order to ensure the rights of women to receive services of good quality, as well as improve informed choice and continuity of contraceptive use. Such a focus on improving quality of services is likely to help the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in making its stated transition from a 'population control centric' to a 'reproductive rights based' approach to family planning in India.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27821190     DOI: 10.1017/S0021932016000602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosoc Sci        ISSN: 0021-9320


  6 in total

1.  India's family planning market and opportunities for the private sector: An analysis using the total market approach.

Authors:  Arupendra Mozumdar; Rajib Acharya; Subrato Kumar Mondal; Amit Arun Shah; Niranjan Saggurti
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2019-03-15

2.  Competency assessment of the medical interns and nurses and documenting prevailing practices to provide family planning services in teaching hospitals in three states of India.

Authors:  Madhu Gupta; Madhur Verma; Kiranjit Kaur; Kirti Iyengar; Tarundeep Singh; Anju Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Measuring quality of care at the community level using the contraceptive method information index plus and client reported experience metrics in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Sharif Hossain; Pooja Sripad; Brady Zieman; Shongkour Roy; Sarah Kennedy; Irfan Hossain; Ben Bellows
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.413

4.  Comparative analysis of contraceptive use in Punjab and Manipur: exploring beyond women's education and empowerment.

Authors:  Anjali Sharma; Abhishek Kumar; S K Mohanty; Arupendra Mozumdar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  Pooled prevalence and determinants of informed choice of contraceptive methods among reproductive age women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Nuhamin Tesfa Tsega; Tsion Tadesse Haile; Melaku Hunie Asratie; Daniel Gashaneh Belay; Mastewal Endalew; Fantu Mamo Aragaw; Sintayehu Simie Tsega; Moges Gashaw
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14

6.  Quality of Family Planning Counseling in Ethiopia: Trends and determinants of information received by female modern contraceptive users, evidence from national survey data, (2014- 2018).

Authors:  Gili Hrusa; Mark Spigt; Tariku Dejene; Solomon Shiferaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.