| Literature DB >> 27821104 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to demonstrate the publication trends of corneal transplantation in the last decade.Entities:
Keywords: Bibliometric analysis; Corneal transplantation; Keratoplasty; Keratoprosthesis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27821104 PMCID: PMC5100230 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0379-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Quantitative distribution and proportions of the publications according to the corneal transplantation techniques and procedures
| Year | Penetr. | Lamel. | Endoth. | Keratopr. | Mixed | Animal | Miscell. | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 78 (49 %) | 20 (13 %) | 23 (15 %) | 11 (7 %) | 11 (7 %) | 6 (4 %) | 8 (5 %) | 157 |
| 2007 | 89 (44 %) | 36 (18 %) | 38 (19 %) | 10 (5 %) | 9 (4.5 %) | 9 (4.5 %) | 10 (5 %) | 201 |
| 2008 | 80 (34 %) | 31 (13 %) | 82 (%35) | 15 (6 %) | 9 (4 %) | 8 (3 %) | 12 (5 %) | 237 |
| 2009 | 78 (31 %) | 33 (13 %) | 98 (38 %) | 13 (5 %) | 17 (7 %) | 3 (1 %) | 13 (5 %) | 255 |
| 2010 | 79 (31 %) | 44 (18 %) | 86 (34 %) | 23 (9 %) | 7 (3 %) | 8 (3 %) | 4 (2 %) | 251 |
| 2011 | 73 (21 %) | 65 (19 %) | 116 (34 %) | 42 (12 %) | 39 (11 %) | 6 (2 %) | 4 (1 %) | 345 |
| 2012 | 64 (20 %) | 43 (13 %) | 112 (34 %) | 50 (15 %) | 32 (10 %) | 9 (3 %) | 16 (5 %) | 326 |
| 2013 | 65 (20 %) | 42 (13 %) | 110 (33 %) | 43 (13 %) | 43 (13 %) | 13 (4 %) | 12 (4 %) | 328 |
| 2014 | 49 (17 %) | 39 (13 %) | 104 (36 %) | 40 (14 %) | 36 (12 %) | 8 (3 %) | 13 (5 %) | 289 |
| 2015 | 50 (15 %) | 50 (15 %) | 119 (35 %) | 57 (17 %) | 34 (10 %) | 13 (4 %) | 14 (4 %) | 337 |
Penetr. penetrating keratoplasty, Lamel. anterior lamellar keratoplasty, Endoth. endothelial keratoplasty, Miscell. miscellaneous
(Percentages of publications by year are written in parenthesis)
Quantitative distribution and proportions of the publications according to the document types and study design
| Year | OA & CR | Letter | MA | Review | Correction | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 133 (85 %) | 12 (7.5 %) | 6 (4 %) | 4 (2.5 %) | 2 (1 %) | 157 |
| 2007 | 159 (79 %) | 28 (14 %) | 6 (3 %) | 7 (3.5 %) | 1 (0.5 %) | 201 |
| 2008 | 183 (77 %) | 39 (16.5 %) | 11 (5 %) | 3 (1 %) | 1 (0.5 %) | 237 |
| 2009 | 212 (83 %) | 30 (12 %) | 4 (1.5 %) | 7 (3 %) | 2 (0.5 %) | 255 |
| 2010 | 212 (84.5 %) | 34 (13.5) | 0 (0 %) | 5 (2 %) | 0 (0 %) | 251 |
| 2011 | 253 (73.5 %) | 77 (22 %) | 7 (2 %) | 6 (2 %) | 2 (0.5 %) | 345 |
| 2012 | 246 (75.5 %) | 52 (16 %) | 10 (3 %) | 15 (4.5 %) | 3 (1 %) | 326 |
| 2013 | 236 (72 %) | 48 (14.5 %) | 29 (9 %) | 12 (3.5 %) | 3 (1 %) | 328 |
| 2014 | 216 (75 %) | 31 (10.5 %) | 23 (8 %) | 19 (6.5 %) | 0 (0 %) | 289 |
| 2015 | 214 (63.5 %) | 41 (12 %) | 73 (21.5 %) | 5 (1.5 %) | 4 (1.5 %) | 337 |
OA original articles, CR case reports, MA meeting abstracts
Fig. 1The top 10 countries which published the most of the keratoplasty documents are shown
Fig. 2The top 5 document types are demonstrated (‘Articles’ represent original clinical, research or experimental studies and case reports)
Fig. 3The top 5 authors’ names according to the published item count are shown
Fig. 4The top 5 journals which published the most of the keratoplasty documents are demonstrated