Literature DB >> 27820705

Use of stress tests in evaluating kidney disease.

Jay L Koyner1, Lakhmir S Chawla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The kidney, like most other organs, has a reserve capacity that can be utilized in times of increased physiologic demand. The ability to quantify this renal reserve function across various parts of the nephron (glomerular and tubular) has been an area of increased investigation over the past several years. In this review, we discuss several techniques that have been developed to interrogate the maximal physiologic capacity of the injured kidney. RECENT
FINDINGS: Although protein loading has been established as an ideal method to investigate glomerular filtration capacity in healthy kidneys, other methods such as the antagonism of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system have demonstrated promise as a method to determine underlying glomerular disease in those with acute kidney injury and other comorbidities (e.g., congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease). The furosemide stress test has been demonstrated to be a useful clinical tool to ascertain tubular integrity in the setting of acute kidney injury.
SUMMARY: Although various methods to interrogate the reserve capacity of the several nephron segments (glomerulus and tubules) have been investigated, none of these techniques have had wide-spread clinical implementation. Further research into acute kidney injury stress testing is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27820705     DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens        ISSN: 1062-4821            Impact factor:   2.894


  3 in total

Review 1.  Phenotyping of Acute Kidney Injury: Beyond Serum Creatinine.

Authors:  Dennis G Moledina; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.299

2.  The furosemide stress test for prediction of worsening acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: A multicenter, prospective, observational study.

Authors:  O G Rewa; S M Bagshaw; X Wang; R Wald; O Smith; J Shapiro; B McMahon; K D Liu; S A Trevino; L S Chawla; J L Koyner
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 3.  Dynamic Biomarker Assessment: A Diagnostic Paradigm to Match the AKI Syndrome.

Authors:  Rajit K Basu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.418

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.