Davangere P Devanand1, Xinhua Liu, Patrick J Brown. 1. *Department of Psychiatry, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Medical Center †Division of Biostatistics in the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The utility of functional deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment is not established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 3886 individuals with mild cognitive impairment evaluated and followed at 34 National Alzheimer Coordinating Center sites, informant-reported Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) items associated with progression to dementia were derived in a training set (n=1943) and tested in the validation set (n=1943). RESULTS: In the training set, the optimal combination comprised 6 FAQ items (FAQ6): difficulties with finances (2 items), remembering events/appointments, playing games of skill, current events, and travel. In the validation set, hazard ratio for dementia increased from 2.00 for 1 FAQ6 deficit to 5.56 for 6 FAQ6 deficits. In patients 50 to 67 years old with high Mini Mental State Exam scores, dementia risk rose from 12.06% for no FAQ6 deficits to 56.75% for 6 functional deficits. Likelihood of progression to dementia reached 80% to 89% in older age groups with low Mini Mental State Exam and severe FAQ6 deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Specific functional deficits increased dementia risk and, with age and global cognition, constituted a validated clinical algorithm to estimate dementia risk. Clinicians can use this clinically important algorithm to personalize decision-making about further investigation and identify high-risk patients for early treatment or inclusion in clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: The utility of functional deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment is not established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 3886 individuals with mild cognitive impairment evaluated and followed at 34 National Alzheimer Coordinating Center sites, informant-reported Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) items associated with progression to dementia were derived in a training set (n=1943) and tested in the validation set (n=1943). RESULTS: In the training set, the optimal combination comprised 6 FAQ items (FAQ6): difficulties with finances (2 items), remembering events/appointments, playing games of skill, current events, and travel. In the validation set, hazard ratio for dementia increased from 2.00 for 1 FAQ6 deficit to 5.56 for 6 FAQ6 deficits. In patients 50 to 67 years old with high Mini Mental State Exam scores, dementia risk rose from 12.06% for no FAQ6 deficits to 56.75% for 6 functional deficits. Likelihood of progression to dementia reached 80% to 89% in older age groups with low Mini Mental State Exam and severe FAQ6 deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Specific functional deficits increased dementia risk and, with age and global cognition, constituted a validated clinical algorithm to estimate dementia risk. Clinicians can use this clinically important algorithm to personalize decision-making about further investigation and identify high-risk patients for early treatment or inclusion in clinical trials.
Authors: Terry E Goldberg; Jeremy Koppel; Lynda Keehlisen; Erica Christen; Ute Dreses-Werringloer; Concepcion Conejero-Goldberg; Marc L Gordon; Peter Davies Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: José Luis Molinuevo; Kaj Blennow; Bruno Dubois; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Piotr Lewczuk; Armand Perret-Liaudet; Charlotte E Teunissen; Lucilla Parnetti Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: H Randall Griffith; Kelli L Netson; Lindy E Harrell; Edward Y Zamrini; John C Brockington; Daniel C Marson Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Matthias H Tabert; Jennifer J Manly; Xinhua Liu; Gregory H Pelton; Sara Rosenblum; Marni Jacobs; Diana Zamora; Madeleine Goodkind; Karen Bell; Yaakov Stern; D P Devanand Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-08
Authors: M H Tabert; S M Albert; L Borukhova-Milov; Y Camacho; G Pelton; X Liu; Y Stern; D P Devanand Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-03-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sarah T Farias; Dan Mungas; Bruce R Reed; Danielle Harvey; Deborah Cahn-Weiner; Charles Decarli Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2006 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; William J Jagust; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Jennifer S Lin; Elizabeth O'Connor; Rebecca C Rossom; Leslie A Perdue; Elizabeth Eckstrom Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Lorna Harper; Frederik Barkhof; Philip Scheltens; Jonathan M Schott; Nick C Fox Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 10.154