Literature DB >> 27819456

Culture shapes spatial frequency tuning for face identification.

Jessica Tardif1, Daniel Fiset2, Ye Zhang3, Amanda Estéphan2, Qiuju Cai3, Canhuang Luo3, Dan Sun3, Frédéric Gosselin1, Caroline Blais2.   

Abstract

Many studies have revealed cultural differences in the way Easterners and Westerners attend to their visual world. It has been proposed that these cultural differences reflect the utilization of different processes, namely holistic processes by Easterners and analytical processes by Westerners. In the face processing literature, eye movement studies have revealed different fixation patterns for Easterners and Westerners that are congruent with a broader spread of attention by Easterners: compared with Westerners, Easterners tend to fixate more toward the center of the face even if they need the information provided by the eyes and mouth. Although this cultural difference could reflect an impact of culture on the visual mechanisms underlying face processing, this interpretation has been questioned by the finding that Easterners and Westerners do not differ on the location of their initial fixations, that is, those that have been shown as being sufficient for face recognition. Because a broader spread of attention is typically linked with the reduced sensitivity to higher spatial frequency, the present study directly compared the spatial frequency tuning of Easterners (Chinese) and Westerners (Canadians) in 2 face recognition tasks (Experiment 1 and 2), along with their general low-level sensitivity to spatial frequencies (Experiment 3). Consistent with our hypothesis, Chinese participants were tuned toward lower spatial frequencies than Canadians participants during the face recognition tasks, despite comparable low-level contrast sensitivity functions. These results strongly support the hypothesis that culture impacts the nature of the visual information extracted during face recognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27819456     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Brain structure differences between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts: A comprehensive morphometry study.

Authors:  Yuchun Tang; Lu Zhao; Yunxia Lou; Yonggang Shi; Rui Fang; Xiangtao Lin; Shuwei Liu; Arthur Toga
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cross-cultural differences in the neural correlates of specific and general recognition.

Authors:  Laura E Paige; John C Ksander; Hunter A Johndro; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Spatial frequency impacts perceptual and attentional ERP components across cultures.

Authors:  Tong Lin; Xin Zhang; Eric C Fields; Robert Sekuler; Angela Gutchess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Re-assessing the role of culture on the visual orientation perception of the rod and frame test.

Authors:  Chéla R Willey; Zili Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Even subtle cultural differences affect face tuning.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Julie Heiz; Alexander N Sokolov; Andreas J Fallgatter; Koviljka Barisnikov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Eye Movement Dynamics Differ between Encoding and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L Noles; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-12

7.  Cultural differences in performance on Eriksen's flanker task.

Authors:  Angela Gutchess; John Ksander; Peter R Millar; Berna A Uzundag; Robert Sekuler; Aysecan Boduroglu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Time Course of Cultural Differences in Spatial Frequency Use for Face Identification.

Authors:  Amanda Estéphan; Daniel Fiset; Camille Saumure; Marie-Pier Plouffe-Demers; Ye Zhang; Dan Sun; Caroline Blais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cultural specialization of visual cortex.

Authors:  John C Ksander; Laura E Paige; Hunter A Johndro; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Self-Construal Priming Affects Holistic Face Processing and Race Categorization, but Not Face Recognition.

Authors:  Xinge Liu; Xingfen Liang; Cong Feng; Guomei Zhou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.