Literature DB >> 27819446

Adult age differences in the interpretation of surprised facial expressions.

Michael M Shuster1, Joseph A Mikels1, Linda A Camras1.   

Abstract

Research on adult age differences in the interpretation of facial expressions has yet to examine evaluations of surprised faces, which signal that an unexpected and ambiguous event has occurred in the expresser's environment. The present study examined whether older and younger adults differed in their interpretations of the affective valence of surprised faces. Specifically, we examined older and younger participants' evaluations of happy, angry, and surprised facial expressions. We predicted that, on the basis of age-related changes in the processing of emotional information, older adults would evaluate surprised faces more positively than would younger adults. The results indicated that older adults interpreted surprised faces more positively than did their younger counterparts. These findings reveal a novel age-related positivity effect in the interpretation of surprised faces, suggesting that older adults imbue ambiguous facial expressions-that is, expressions that lack either positive or negative facial actions-with positive meaning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27819446      PMCID: PMC5864289          DOI: 10.1037/emo0000234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  21 in total

1.  Contextual modulation of amygdala responsivity to surprised faces.

Authors:  Hackjin Kim; Leah H Somerville; Tom Johnstone; Sara Polis; Andrew L Alexander; Lisa M Shin; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; James W Tanaka; Andrew C Leon; Thomas McCarry; Marcella Nurse; Todd A Hare; David J Marcus; Alissa Westerlund; B J Casey; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: similar in agreement but different in positivity.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Robert G Franklin; Suzanne Hillman; Henry Boc
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-12-31

4.  Individual differences in neural activity during a facial expression vs. identity working memory task.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research.

Authors:  A J Fridlund; J T Cacioppo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Valence resolution of ambiguous facial expressions using an emotional oddball task.

Authors:  Maital Neta; F Caroline Davis; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-06-27

7.  Threat processing in generalized social phobia: an investigation of interpretation biases in ambiguous facial affect.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; Nicu Sebe; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-04

9.  Messages that matter: Age differences in affective responses to framed health messages.

Authors:  Joseph A Mikels; Michael M Shuster; Sydney T Thai; Renae Smith-Ray; Christian E Waugh; Kayla Roth; Alexis Keilly; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06

10.  Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Catherine J Norris; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  The Appraisal Approach to Aging and Emotion: An Integrative Theoretical Framework.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Young; Alyssa R Minton; Joseph A Mikels
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2021-02-08

2.  Positivity effect in aging: evidence for the primacy of positive responses to emotional ambiguity.

Authors:  Nathan M Petro; Ruby Basyouni; Maital Neta
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.133

3.  Social connectedness and negative affect uniquely explain individual differences in response to emotional ambiguity.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Rebecca L Brock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.