| Literature DB >> 27818890 |
Nadjim Ahmed Mohamed1, Qian Yu1, Mohamed Ibrahim Chanfi2, Yangping Li1, Shi Wang1, Xiaoting Huang1, Zhenmin Bao1.
Abstract
Small giant clam, Tridacna maxima, widely distributed from French Polynesia to East Africa, has faced population declines due to over-exploitation. Comoros islands are an important biogeographic region due to potential richness of marine species, but no relevant information is available. In order to facilitate devising effective conservation management plan for T. maxima, nine microsatellite markers were used to survey genetic diversity and population differentiation of 72 specimens collected from three Comoros islands, Grande Comore, Moheli and Anjouan. A total of 51 alleles were detected ranged from 2 to 8 per locus. Observed and expected heterozygosity varied from 0.260 to 0.790 and from 0.542 to 0.830, respectively. All populations have high genetic diversity, especially the population in Moheli, a protected area, has higher genetic diversity than the others. Significant heterozygote deficiencies were recorded, and null alleles were probably the main factor leading to these deficits. FST value indicated medium genetic differentiation among the populations. Although significant, AMOVA revealed 48.9 % of genetic variation within individuals and only a small variation of 8.9 % was found between populations. Gene flow was high (Nm = 12.40) between Grande Comore and Moheli, while lower (Nm = 1.80) between Grande Comore and Anjouan, explaining geographic barriers to genetic exchanges might exist in these two islands. Global gene flow analysis (Nm = 5.50) showed that larval dispersal is enough to move between the islands. The high genetic diversity and medium population differentiation revealed in the present study offer useful information on genetic conservation of small giant clams.Entities:
Keywords: Comoros islands; Gene flow; Genetic diversity; Marine protected areas; Population differentiation; Tridacna maxima
Year: 2016 PMID: 27818890 PMCID: PMC5075322 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-3513-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Map showing the sampling collections of T. maxima in Comoros islands
Sample details of T. maxima. For each sampling location, geographical coordinates, number (n) of individuals, shell length (L) and collection time are shown
| Sample locality (abbreviation used) | Geographical coordinates | n | L (cm) | Collection time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grande-Comore (Gc) | From 11°23′S and 43°17′E to 11°29′S and 43°24′E | 24 | 16.85 ± 4.34 | June 2015 |
| Moheli (Mo) | From 12°22′S and 43°44′E to 12°22′S and 43°52′E | 20 | 17.08 ± 3.68 | June 2015 |
| Anjouan (An) | 12°05′S and 44°25′E | 28 | 18.80 ± 5.50 | June 2015 |
Respective sequences of nine microsatellite loci of T. maxima developed by Grulois et al. (2014) using in our study
| Locus | Primer sequence 5′-3′ | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Tm06526 | F: TCCCATTGAAAAGTCTACGCAC | 263–295 |
| Tm11666 | F: ATCGCACTTCCGCTTTGATG | 217–253 |
| Tm14538 | F: AGCCTAGAGAGAAATACAGAAAGG | 88–120 |
| Tm20025 | F: GCGCGAGAAATCTAAGGCAC | 240–282 |
| Tm23637 | F: GTCCTTGGGCAGGAGATTTTG | 199–243 |
| Tm23670 | F: GGTCGGTAGAGAAGGTGTCC | 143–217 |
| Tm24162 | F: TGGACAGATTCAGTGTCGGC | 193–260 |
| Tm24224 | F: TGTATGCCGTCCACAAAAGC | 258–292 |
| Tm25349 | F: TCCGTTTCCTATTGATGTTGTCC | 105–133 |
Allele number (N ), observed heterozygoty (H ), expected heterozygoty (H ), allelic richness (A ), population inbreeding coefficient (F ) and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)
| Site (code) | GeneBank accession/locus | Mean | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KM267264 | KM267265 | KM267266 | KM267268 | KM267269 | KM267270 | KM267271 | KM267272 | KM267273 | ||
| Tm06526 | Tm11666 | Tm14538 | Tm20025 | Tm23637 | Tm23670 | Tm24162 | Tm24224 | Tm25349 | ||
| Grande Comore (Gc) | ||||||||||
| | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4.777 |
| | 0.444 | 0.350 | 0.500 | 0.761 | 0.090 | 0.318 | 0.368 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 0.320 |
| | 0.836 | 0.792 | 0.794 | 0.794 | 0.778 | 0.760 | 0.763 | 0.783 | 0.102 | 0.695 |
| | 5.997 | 5.692 | 4.998 | 4.998 | 4.904 | 4.000 | 4.992 | 4.942 | 1.960 | 4.720 |
| | 0.568 | 0.555 | 0.580 | 0.628 | 0.510 | 0.552 | 0.560 | 0.502 | 0.549 | 0.555 |
| HWE ( |
|
|
| 0.525 |
|
|
|
|
| – |
| Anjouan (An) | ||||||||||
| | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| | 0.708 | 0.480 | 0.478 | 0.777 | 0.153 | 0.407 | 0.440 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.382 |
| | 0.778 | 0.766 | 0.848 | 0.754 | 0.725 | 0.748 | 0.721 | 0.728 | 0.222 | 0.699 |
| | 4.953 | 5.444 | 7.419 | 4.000 | 5.228 | 4.000 | 4.883 | 3.998 | 2.824 | 4.750 |
| | 0.509 | 0.468 | 0.460 | 0.525 | 0.414 | 0.459 | 0.465 | 0.385 | 0.438 | 0.460 |
| HWE ( | 0.143 |
|
| 0.692 |
|
|
|
|
| – |
| Moheli (Mo) | ||||||||||
| | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5.333 |
| | 0.800 | 0.250 | 0.588 | 0.833 | 0.611 | 0.470 | 0.466 | 0.117 | 0.000 | 0.460 |
| | 0.802 | 0.681 | 0.714 | 0.804 | 0.850 | 0.768 | 0.726 | 0.736 | 0.349 | 0.715 |
| | 5.000 | 6.810 | 6.850 | 5.000 | 6.833 | 4.000 | 5.000 | 4.872 | 3.000 | 5.262 |
| | 0.415 | 0.331 | 0.387 | 0.420 | 0.376 | 0.360 | 0.364 | 0.302 | 0.327 | 0.365 |
| HWE ( | 0.4441 |
| 0.270 | 0.479 |
|
|
|
|
| – |
Value in italic indicates significant deviations from HWE (P < 0.05) after sequential Bonferroni corrections
Pairwise F st values (below diagonal) and number of migrants per generation (above diagonal) among three populations of T. maxima
| Gc | An | Mo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gc | 1.80 | 12.40 | |
| An | 0.120* | 2.35 | |
| Mo | 0.020* | 0.095* |
* Significant at P < 0.05
Nei’s unbiased genetic similarity (above diagonal) and genetic distance (below diagonal)
| Gc | An | Mo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gc | 0.620 | 0.885 | |
| An | 0.480 | 0.690 | |
| Mo | 0.120 | 0.350 |
AMOVA analysis for three populations of T. maxima
| Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 2 | 34.151 | 0.315 | 8.9* |
| Among individuals within populations | 67 | 278.063 | 1.491 | 42.2* |
| Within individuals | 70 | 107.000 | 1.727 | 48.9* |
| Total | 139 | 419.214 | 3.534 |
* Significant at P < 0.05
Fig. 2Unweighted pair group method average dendrogram (UPGMA) based on Nei’s Genetic distance among population