Literature DB >> 27818539

A covariance correction that accounts for correlation estimation to improve finite-sample inference with generalized estimating equations: A study on its applicability with structured correlation matrices.

Philip M Westgate1.   

Abstract

When generalized estimating equations (GEE) incorporate an unstructured working correlation matrix, the variances of regression parameter estimates can inflate due to the estimation of the correlation parameters. In previous work, an approximation for this inflation that results in a corrected version of the sandwich formula for the covariance matrix of regression parameter estimates was derived. Use of this correction for correlation structure selection also reduces the over-selection of the unstructured working correlation matrix. In this manuscript, we conduct a simulation study to demonstrate that an increase in variances of regression parameter estimates can occur when GEE incorporates structured working correlation matrices as well. Correspondingly, we show the ability of the corrected version of the sandwich formula to improve the validity of inference and correlation structure selection. We also study the relative influences of two popular corrections to a different source of bias in the empirical sandwich covariance estimator.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias correction; correlation selection; efficiency; empirical covariance matrix; generalized estimating equations

Year:  2015        PMID: 27818539      PMCID: PMC5089177          DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2015.1089873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Comput Simul        ISSN: 0094-9655            Impact factor:   1.424


  9 in total

1.  A covariance estimator for GEE with improved small-sample properties.

Authors:  L A Mancl; T A DeRouen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A comparison of several approaches for choosing between working correlation structures in generalized estimating equation analysis of longitudinal binary data.

Authors:  Justine Shults; Wenguang Sun; Xin Tu; Hanjoo Kim; Jay Amsterdam; Joseph M Hilbe; Thomas Ten-Have
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Working-correlation-structure identification in generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  Lin-Yee Hin; You-Gan Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  M G Kenward; J H Roger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A bias correction for covariance estimators to improve inference with generalized estimating equations that use an unstructured correlation matrix.

Authors:  Philip M Westgate
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A bias-corrected covariance estimate for improved inference with quadratic inference functions.

Authors:  Philip M Westgate
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Improving the correlation structure selection approach for generalized estimating equations and balanced longitudinal data.

Authors:  Philip M Westgate
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Criterion for the simultaneous selection of a working correlation structure and either generalized estimating equations or the quadratic inference function approach.

Authors:  Philip M Westgate
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  Correlated binary regression with covariates specific to each binary observation.

Authors:  R L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  On the analysis of very small samples of Gaussian repeated measurements: an alternative approach.

Authors:  Philip M Westgate; Woodrow W Burchett
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 2-Analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Melanie Prague; John A Gallis; Fan Li; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Assessment of triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) exposure to nail salon workers by air, hand wipe, and urine analysis.

Authors:  Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Alexander Mayer; Jonathan Slone; I-Chen Chen; Michael Zhou; Mark J La Guardia; Nayana Jayatilaka; Maria Ospina; Antonia Calafat
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.840

4.  Comparison of small-sample standard-error corrections for generalised estimating equations in stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome: A simulation study.

Authors:  J A Thompson; K Hemming; A Forbes; K Fielding; R Hayes
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.021

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.