Literature DB >> 27817835

Contemporary short- and long-term outcomes in patients with unremitting constipation and fecal incontinence treated with an antegrade continence enema.

Scott C Dolejs1, John K Smith1, Justin Sheplock1, Joseph M Croffie2, Frederick J Rescorla3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study is to determine the natural history of patients who undergo an antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedure including complications, functional results, and long-term outcomes.
METHODS: Patients aged 3-18years who underwent an ACE procedure from 2008 to 2015 for unremitting constipation and fecal incontinence with at least thirty day follow-up were included. Patients with congenital anatomic disorders of the spine, rectum, and anus were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were included in the analysis with an average age of 10+/-4years and follow-up of 26+/-41months. The ACE procedure was rapidly effective, with 99% of patients experiencing improvement at 1month. At the end of follow-up, 83% of patients had normal bowel function, and 95% of patients noted improvement. Amongst patients with at least 24months of follow-up (n=51), 43% successfully stopped using their ACE at an average of 40+/-27months. Overall morbidity was 55%, mostly related to minor complications. However, 13% of patients required an additional operation.
CONCLUSION: The ACE procedure is very successful in the treatment of unremitting constipation with fecal incontinence in appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ace; Antegrade continence enema; Constipation; Fecal incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27817835     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  4 in total

1.  Transition and reversal: long-term experience of the MACE procedure in children.

Authors:  Riyad Peeraully; Jason Langley; Nicola Hayes; Kate Storry; Louise Richardson; Demelza Burridge; Bharat More
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Analysis of Factors Associated with Patient or Caregiver Regret following Surgery for Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Bhalaajee Meenakshi-Sundaram; Caitlin T Coco; James R Furr; Byron P Dubow; Christopher E Aston; Jennifer Lewis; Gennady Slobodov; Bradley P Kropp; Dominic C Frimberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.600

3.  Comparison of antegrade continence enema treatment and sacral nerve stimulation for children with severe functional constipation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Mana H Vriesman; Lyon Wang; Candice Park; Karen A Diefenbach; Marc A Levitt; Richard J Wood; Seth A Alpert; Marc A Benninga; Karla Vaz; Desale Yacob; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Peter L Lu
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Refractory functional constipation: clinical management or appendicostomy?

Authors:  Vanesca P A de Arruda; Maria A Bellomo-Brandão; Joaquim M Bustorff-Silva; Elizete Aparecida Lomazi
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.990

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.