Literature DB >> 27816957

Estimating the intra- and inter-individual imprecision of manual pipetting.

Giuseppe Lippi1, Gabriel Lima-Oliveira1, Giorgio Brocco1, Antonella Bassi1, Gian Luca Salvagno1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of manual pipetting of fluids such as water, solutions, buffers, reagents, or biological samples in daily laboratory practice, the intra- and inter-individual imprecision of this activity has not been recently described in scientific publications.
METHODS: Twenty laboratory operators were randomly enrolled for this study. Imprecision of manual pipetting was estimated by asking each laboratory professional to dispense 1 mL, 100 μL or 10 μL of distilled water for 10 consecutive times with three certified pipettes into a 50-mL plastic container placed into a gravimetric balance. The weight of the water dispensed was systematically recorded for each of the 10 repeated attempts, and the inter- and intra-operator imprecision was finally calculated and expressed as coefficient of variation (CV%).
RESULTS: The mean intra-individual imprecision was 5.7% (range, 0%-11.8%) for pipetting 10 μL, 0.8% (range, 0.4%-1.9%) for pipetting 100 μL, and 0.2% (range, 0.1%-0.5%) for pipetting 1 mL. Overall, the mean inter-individual imprecision was 8.1% for pipetting 10 μL, 1.1% for pipetting 100 μL and 0.4% for pipetting 1 mL. A significantly inverse correlation was found between intra-individual pipetting imprecision and the amount of water dispensed (r = -0.80; p<0.001). No significant correlation was observed between individual pipetting performance and sex, age, qualification, and years of experience in the laboratory.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that manual pipetting is plagued by a considerable intra- and inter-individual imprecision, which is inversely correlated with the amount of fluid dispensed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  imprecision; pipette; pipetting; quality; variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27816957     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  5 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in Laboratory Diagnosis of the Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Nadin Younes; Duaa W Al-Sadeq; Hadeel Al-Jighefee; Salma Younes; Ola Al-Jamal; Hanin I Daas; Hadi M Yassine; Gheyath K Nasrallah
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.048

2.  Internal quality assurance of HIL indices on Roche Cobas c702.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Janne Cadamuro; Elisa Danese; Matteo Gelati; Martina Montagnana; Alexander von Meyer; Gian Luca Salvagno; Ana-Maria Simundic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Challenges in Preanalytical Phase of Laboratory Medicine: Rate of Blood Sample Nonconformity in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Nusrat Alavi; Sana Haseeb Khan; Asma Saadia; Tahir Naeem
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2020-03-20

4.  Pipette Show: An Open Source Web Application to Support Pipetting into Microplates.

Authors:  Johannes Falk; Marc Mendler; Johannes Kabisch
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.110

5.  Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: The Submission of a Survey to Investigate the Opinion of Insiders.

Authors:  Daniele Giansanti; Ivano Rossi; Lisa Monoscalco
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.