Literature DB >> 27816408

Assessment of organs-at-risk contouring practices in radiosurgery institutions around the world - The first initiative of the OAR Standardization Working Group.

Helena Sandström1, Caroline Chung2, Hidefumi Jokura3, Michael Torrens4, David Jaffray5, Iuliana Toma-Dasu6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This study was an initiative of the Organs-at-Risk Standardization Working Group for evaluating the current degree of variability in the clinical practice of contouring organs-at-risk (OAR) for radiosurgery planning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging datasets for typical lesions (cavernous sinus meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, pituitary adenoma) treated with Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion were circulated to 12 centers. Observers were asked to contour the target and OARs as per their standard clinical practice. The analyzed parameters were the intersection (AV100), union volumes (AV100/N) and the 50% agreement volume (AV50). The ratio of AV100 and AV100/N (the Agreement Volume Index, AVI) was used as a measure of agreement level together with a generalized conformity index (CIgen) and a pairwise averaged conformity index (CIpairs). The maximum doses were also determined.
RESULTS: Results showed a wide variability in terminology, choice of structures contoured and in the size and shape of the contoured structures. The highest variability was observed for the left and right optic tract for cavernous sinus meningioma where the AV100 was zero. The highest consistency was observed for the right optic nerve in the cavernous sinus case followed by the cochlea for the vestibular schwannoma case for which the AVI was still only 0.13 and 0.054, respectively. Corresponding results for the CIgen and CIpairs also showed the highest variability for the right optic tract and the highest consistency in contours for the right optic nerve, both in the cavernous sinus meningioma case.
CONCLUSION: The results quantify the large variability in OAR contouring in clinical practice across Gamma Knife radiosurgery centers with respect to the choice of OARs to be contoured, nomenclature and size and shape of OARs. This motivates future effort to standardize practices to enable more effective collaboration. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chiasm; Cochlea; Inter-observer variability; Optic nerve; Stereotactic radiosurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27816408     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

1.  Standardization of nomenclature of targets and critical structures in radiosurgery: The case of a single Gamma Knife center.

Authors:  Alexey S Tokarev; Viacheslav A Rak; Olga L Evdokimova; Valentin N Stepanov; Greg V Koynash; Olga A Viktorova; Artur V Kistenev
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2020

2.  Dependence of volume calculation and margin growth accuracy on treatment planning systems for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  David J Eaton; Kevin Alty
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Single- and Multi-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose Tolerances of the Optic Pathways.

Authors:  Michael T Milano; Jimm Grimm; Scott G Soltys; Ellen Yorke; Vitali Moiseenko; Wolfgang A Tomé; Arjun Sahgal; Jinyu Xue; Lijun Ma; Timothy D Solberg; John P Kirkpatrick; Louis S Constine; John C Flickinger; Lawrence B Marks; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 8.013

4.  Initial experience with introducing national guidelines for CT- and MRI-based delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Caroline Olsson; Tufve Nyholm; Elinore Wieslander; Eva Onjukka; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Johan Reizenstein; Stefan Johnsson; Ingrid Kristensen; Johan Skönevik; Magnus Karlsson; Ulf Isacsson; Anna Flejmer; Edvard Abel; Fredrik Nordström; Leif Nyström; Kjell Bergfeldt; Björn Zackrisson; Alexander Valdman
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-23

5.  New target volume delineation and PTV strategies to further personalise radiotherapy.

Authors:  David Bernstein; Alexandra Taylor; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Improved dosimetric accuracy with semi-automatic contour propagation of organs-at-risk in glioblastoma patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Authors:  Sangjune Lee; James Stewart; Young Lee; Sten Myrehaug; Arjun Sahgal; Mark Ruschin; Chia-Lin Tseng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Glioma consensus contouring recommendations from a MR-Linac International Consortium Research Group and evaluation of a CT-MRI and MRI-only workflow.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Tseng; James Stewart; Gillian Whitfield; Joost J C Verhoeff; Joseph Bovi; Hany Soliman; Caroline Chung; Sten Myrehaug; Mikki Campbell; Eshetu G Atenafu; Chinthaka Heyn; Sunit Das; James Perry; Mark Ruschin; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 4.130

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.