Literature DB >> 27815357

BRAF and NRAS Locus-Specific Variants Have Different Outcomes on Survival to Colorectal Cancer.

Matthew G Summers1, Christopher G Smith1, Timothy S Maughan2, Richard Kaplan3, Valentina Escott-Price4, Jeremy P Cheadle5.   

Abstract

Purpose: Somatic mutation status at KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS is associated with prognosis in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC); however, it remains unclear whether there are intralocus, variant-specific differences in survival and other clinicopathologic parameters.Experimental Design: We profiled 2,157 aCRCs for somatic mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS and determined microsatellite instability status. We sought inter- and intralocus correlations between mutations and variant-specific associations with survival and clinicopathology.
Results: KRAS mutations were rarely found together and those in codons 12 and 13 conferred poor prognosis [hazard ratio (HR), 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-1.61; P = 6.4 × 10-10 and HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.26-1.86; P = 1.5 × 10-05, respectively]. For BRAF, more c.1781A>G (p.D594G) CRCs carried RAS mutations [14% (3/21)] compared with c.1799T>A (p.V600E) CRCs [1% (2/178), P = 9.0 × 10-03]. c.1799T>A (p.V600E) was associated with poor prognosis (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.06-3.28; P = 1.0 × 10-15), whereas c.1781A>G (p.D594G) was not (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.73-2.31; P = 0.37); this intralocus difference was significant (P = 0.04). More c.1799T>A (p.V600E) colorectal cancers were found in the right colon [47% (47/100)], compared with c.1781A>G (p.D594G) colorectal cancers [7% (1/15), P = 3.7 × 10-03]. For NRAS, 5% (3/60) of codon 61 mutant colorectal cancers had KRAS mutations compared with 44% (10/23) of codons 12 and 13 mutant colorectal cancers (P = 7.9 × 10-05). Codon 61 mutations conferred poor prognosis (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09-1.99; P = 0.01), whereas codons 12 and 13 mutations did not (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.64-2.58; P = 0.48).Conclusions: Our data show considerable intralocus variation in the outcomes of mutations in BRAF and NRAS These data need to be considered in patient management and personalized cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); 2742-9. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27815357     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  23 in total

1.  Mutation Status of RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 is Superior to Mutation Status of RAS Alone for Predicting Prognosis after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Scott Kopetz; Timothy E Newhook; Mario De Bellis; Yun Shin Chun; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Cancers Harboring NRAS Mutations.

Authors:  Andrea Cercek; Maria Ignez Braghiroli; Joanne F Chou; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Nancy Kemeny; Leonard Saltz; Marinela Capanu; Rona Yaeger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer genomics and designing rational trials.

Authors:  Sebastian Mondaca; Rona Yaeger
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

Review 4.  Biomarker-guided therapy for colorectal cancer: strength in complexity.

Authors:  Anita Sveen; Scott Kopetz; Ragnhild A Lothe
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Association of RAS Mutation Location and Oncologic Outcomes After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Lily V Saadat; Thomas Boerner; Debra A Goldman; Mithat Gonen; Timothy L Frankel; Efsevia Vakiani; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Alice C Wei; Kevin C Soares; David B Solit; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Colorectal Cancers: An Update on Their Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Kentaro Inamura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Regulation of mutant TERT by BRAF V600E/MAP kinase pathway through FOS/GABP in human cancer.

Authors:  Rengyun Liu; Tao Zhang; Guangwu Zhu; Mingzhao Xing
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Genomic Sequencing and Insight into Clinical Heterogeneity and Prognostic Pathway Genes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Scott Kopetz; Lawrence Kwong; Lianchun Xiao; Jeffrey S Morris; Hop S Tran Cao; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Yun Shin Chun; Jeffrey E Lee; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.532

Review 9.  Molecular Determinants and Other Factors to Guide Selection of Patients for Hepatic Resection of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas M Diehl; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05

Review 10.  Optimising the use of cetuximab in the continuum of care for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Clara Montagut; Zev A Wainberg; Philippe Ronga; François Audhuy; Julien Taieb; Sebastian Stintzing; Salvatore Siena; Daniele Santini
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.