Andreas Kuehnl1, Pavlos Tsantilas1, Christoph Knappich1, Sofie Schmid1, Thomas König1, Thorben Breitkreuz1, Alexander Zimmermann1, Ulrich Mansmann1, Hans-Henning Eckstein2. 1. From the Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany (A.K., P.T., C.K., S.S., H.-H.E.); AQUA-Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Göttingen, Germany (T.K., T.B.); and Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany (U.M.). 2. From the Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany (A.K., P.T., C.K., S.S., H.-H.E.); AQUA-Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Göttingen, Germany (T.K., T.B.); and Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany (U.M.). gefaesschirurgie@mri.tum.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Associations between hospital volume and the risk of stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on a national level in Germany were analyzed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Secondary data analysis using microdata from the nationwide statutory German quality assurance database on all surgical or endovascular carotid interventions on the extracranial carotid artery between 2009 and 2014. Hospitals were categorized into empirically determined quintiles according to the annual case volume. The resulting volume thresholds were 10, 25, 46, and 79 for CEA and 2, 6, 12, and 26 for CAS procedures. The primary outcome was any stroke or death before hospital discharge. For risk-adjusted analyses, a multilevel regression model was applied. The analysis included 161 448 CEA and 17 575 CAS procedures. In CEA patients, the crude risk of stroke or death decreased monotonically from 4.2% (95% confidence interval, 3.6%-4.9%) in low-volume hospitals (first quintile 1-10 CEA per year) to 2.1% (2.0%-2.2%) in hospitals providing ≥80 CEA per year (fifth quintile; P<0.001 for trend). The overall risk of any stroke or death in CAS patients was 3.7% (3.5%-4.0%), but no trend on annual volume was seen (P=0.304). Risk-adjusted analyses confirmed a significant inverse relationship between hospital volume (categorized or continuous) and the risk of stroke or death after CEA but not CAS procedures. CONCLUSIONS: An inverse volume-outcome relationship in CEA-treated patients was demonstrated. No significant association between hospital volume and the risk of stroke or death was found for CAS.
BACKGROUND: Associations between hospital volume and the risk of stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on a national level in Germany were analyzed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Secondary data analysis using microdata from the nationwide statutory German quality assurance database on all surgical or endovascular carotid interventions on the extracranial carotid artery between 2009 and 2014. Hospitals were categorized into empirically determined quintiles according to the annual case volume. The resulting volume thresholds were 10, 25, 46, and 79 for CEA and 2, 6, 12, and 26 for CAS procedures. The primary outcome was any stroke or death before hospital discharge. For risk-adjusted analyses, a multilevel regression model was applied. The analysis included 161 448 CEA and 17 575 CAS procedures. In CEA patients, the crude risk of stroke or death decreased monotonically from 4.2% (95% confidence interval, 3.6%-4.9%) in low-volume hospitals (first quintile 1-10 CEA per year) to 2.1% (2.0%-2.2%) in hospitals providing ≥80 CEA per year (fifth quintile; P<0.001 for trend). The overall risk of any stroke or death in CASpatients was 3.7% (3.5%-4.0%), but no trend on annual volume was seen (P=0.304). Risk-adjusted analyses confirmed a significant inverse relationship between hospital volume (categorized or continuous) and the risk of stroke or death after CEA but not CAS procedures. CONCLUSIONS: An inverse volume-outcome relationship in CEA-treated patients was demonstrated. No significant association between hospital volume and the risk of stroke or death was found for CAS.
Authors: Christian Lopez Ramos; Michael G Brandel; Robert C Rennert; Brian R Hirshman; Arvin R Wali; Jeffrey A Steinberg; David R Santiago-Dieppa; Mitchell Flagg; Scott E Olson; J Scott Pannell; Alexander A Khalessi Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Sofie Schmid; Pavlos Tsantilas; Christoph Knappich; Michael Kallmayer; Thomas König; Thorben Breitkreuz; Alexander Zimmermann; Andreas Kuehnl; Hans-Henning Eckstein Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Benedikt Reutersberg; Michael Salvermoser; Matthias Trenner; Sarah Geisbüsch; Alexander Zimmermann; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Andreas Kuehnl Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Michiel H F Poorthuis; Eelco C Brand; Alison Halliday; Richard Bulbulia; Michiel L Bots; Gert J de Borst Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 12.969