A A Tarnutzer1,2, D Straumann1,2, P Brugger1, N Feddermann-Demont1,2. 1. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 2. Swiss Concussion Center, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
AIM/ OBJECTIVE: There is ongoing controversy about persistent neurological deficits in active and former football (soccer) players. We reviewed the literature for associations between football activities (including heading/head injuries) and decline in brain structure/function. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane-CRCT, SportDiscus, Cochrane-DSR=4 (accessed 2 August 2016). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Original studies reporting on football-related persistent effects on brain structure/function. Results from neurocognitive testing, neuroimaging and EEG were compared with controls and/or correlated with heading frequency and/or head injuries. Methodological quality was rated for risk-of-bias, including appropriateness of controls, correction for multiple statistical testing and assessment of heading frequency and head injuries. RESULTS: 30 studies with 1691 players were included. Those 57% (8/14) of case-control studies reporting persistent neurocognitive impairment had higher odds for inappropriate control of type 1 errors (OR=17.35 (95% CI (10.61 to 28.36)) and for inappropriate selection of controls (OR=1.72 (1.22 to 2.43)) than studies observing no impairment. Studies reporting a correlation between heading frequency and neurocognitive deficits (6/17) had lower quality of heading assessment (OR=14.20 (9.01 to 22.39)) than studies reporting no such correlation. In 7 of 13 studies (54%), the number of head injuries correlated with the degree of neurocognitive impairment. Abnormalities on neuroimaging (6/8 studies) were associated with subclinical neurocognitive deficits in 3 of 4 studies. SUMMARY/ CONCLUSIONS: Various methodological shortcomings limit the evidence for persistent effects of football play on brain structure/function. Sources of bias include low-quality assessment of heading frequency, inappropriate control for type 1 errors and inappropriate selection of controls. Combining neuroimaging techniques with neurocognitive testing in prospective studies seems most promising to further clarify on the impact of football on the brain. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
AIM/ OBJECTIVE: There is ongoing controversy about persistent neurological deficits in active and former football (soccer) players. We reviewed the literature for associations between football activities (including heading/head injuries) and decline in brain structure/function. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane-CRCT, SportDiscus, Cochrane-DSR=4 (accessed 2 August 2016). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Original studies reporting on football-related persistent effects on brain structure/function. Results from neurocognitive testing, neuroimaging and EEG were compared with controls and/or correlated with heading frequency and/or head injuries. Methodological quality was rated for risk-of-bias, including appropriateness of controls, correction for multiple statistical testing and assessment of heading frequency and head injuries. RESULTS: 30 studies with 1691 players were included. Those 57% (8/14) of case-control studies reporting persistent neurocognitive impairment had higher odds for inappropriate control of type 1 errors (OR=17.35 (95% CI (10.61 to 28.36)) and for inappropriate selection of controls (OR=1.72 (1.22 to 2.43)) than studies observing no impairment. Studies reporting a correlation between heading frequency and neurocognitive deficits (6/17) had lower quality of heading assessment (OR=14.20 (9.01 to 22.39)) than studies reporting no such correlation. In 7 of 13 studies (54%), the number of head injuries correlated with the degree of neurocognitive impairment. Abnormalities on neuroimaging (6/8 studies) were associated with subclinical neurocognitive deficits in 3 of 4 studies. SUMMARY/ CONCLUSIONS: Various methodological shortcomings limit the evidence for persistent effects of football play on brain structure/function. Sources of bias include low-quality assessment of heading frequency, inappropriate control for type 1 errors and inappropriate selection of controls. Combining neuroimaging techniques with neurocognitive testing in prospective studies seems most promising to further clarify on the impact of football on the brain. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Allen A Champagne; Nicole S Coverdale; Mike Germuska; Alex A Bhogal; Douglas J Cook Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Mireille E Kelley; Jillian E Urban; Logan E Miller; Derek A Jones; Mark A Espeland; Elizabeth M Davenport; Christopher T Whitlow; Joseph A Maldjian; Joel D Stitzel Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Andrew R Mayer; Mayank Kaushal; Andrew B Dodd; Faith M Hanlon; Nicholas A Shaff; Rebekah Mannix; Christina L Master; John J Leddy; David Stephenson; Christopher J Wertz; Elizabeth M Suelzer; Kristy B Arbogast; Timothy B Meier Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Stephan Becker; Joshua Berger; Marco Backfisch; Oliver Ludwig; Jens Kelm; Michael Fröhlich Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Lindsey C Lamond; Jaclyn B Caccese; Thomas A Buckley; Joseph Glutting; Thomas W Kaminski Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Arthur Maerlender; Eric Smith; P Gunnar Brolinson; Joseph Crisco; Jillian Urban; Amaris Ajamil; Steven Rowson; Eamon T Campolettano; Ryan A Gellner; Srinidhi Bellamkonda; Emily Kieffer; Mireille E Kelley; Derek Jones; Alex Powers; Jonathan Beckwith; Joel Stitzel; Richard M Greenwald; Stefan Duma Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Alexa E Walter; James R Wilkes; Peter A Arnett; Sayers John Miller; Wayne Sebastianelli; Peter Seidenberg; Semyon M Slobounov Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Alejandro López-Valenciano; Javier Raya-González; Jose Alberto Garcia-Gómez; Alba Aparicio-Sarmiento; Pilar Sainz de Baranda; Mark De Ste Croix; Francisco Ayala Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Sara B Strauss; Roman Fleysher; Chloe Ifrah; Liane E Hunter; Kenny Ye; Richard B Lipton; Molly E Zimmerman; Mimi Kim; Walter F Stewart; Michael L Lipton Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 3.978