Literature DB >> 27815194

Evolutionary engineering reveals divergent paths when yeast is adapted to different acidic environments.

Eugene Fletcher1, Amir Feizi1, Markus M M Bisschops1, Björn M Hallström2, Sakda Khoomrung1, Verena Siewers1, Jens Nielsen3.   

Abstract

Tolerance of yeast to acid stress is important for many industrial processes including organic acid production. Therefore, elucidating the molecular basis of long term adaptation to acidic environments will be beneficial for engineering production strains to thrive under such harsh conditions. Previous studies using gene expression analysis have suggested that both organic and inorganic acids display similar responses during short term exposure to acidic conditions. However, biological mechanisms that will lead to long term adaptation of yeast to acidic conditions remains unknown and whether these mechanisms will be similar for tolerance to both organic and inorganic acids is yet to be explored. We therefore evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae to acquire tolerance to HCl (inorganic acid) and to 0.3M L-lactic acid (organic acid) at pH 2.8 and then isolated several low pH tolerant strains. Whole genome sequencing and RNA-seq analysis of the evolved strains revealed different sets of genome alterations suggesting a divergence in adaptation to these two acids. An altered sterol composition and impaired iron uptake contributed to HCl tolerance whereas the formation of a multicellular morphology and rapid lactate degradation was crucial for tolerance to high concentrations of lactic acid. Our findings highlight the contribution of both the selection pressure and nature of the acid as a driver for directing the evolutionary path towards tolerance to low pH. The choice of carbon source was also an important factor in the evolutionary process since cells evolved on two different carbon sources (raffinose and glucose) generated a different set of mutations in response to the presence of lactic acid. Therefore, different strategies are required for a rational design of low pH tolerant strains depending on the acid of interest.
Copyright © 2016 International Metabolic Engineering Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive laboratory evolution; Lactic acid; Low pH; Yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27815194     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metab Eng        ISSN: 1096-7176            Impact factor:   9.783


  17 in total

1.  Transcription factor Hap5 induces gsh2 expression to enhance 2-phenylethanol tolerance and production in an industrial yeast Candida glycerinogenes.

Authors:  Yuqin Wang; Zhongyuan Zhang; Xinyao Lu; Hong Zong; Bin Zhuge
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  The emergence of adaptive laboratory evolution as an efficient tool for biological discovery and industrial biotechnology.

Authors:  Troy E Sandberg; Michael J Salazar; Liam L Weng; Bernhard O Palsson; Adam M Feist
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 9.783

3.  Evolutionary and reverse engineering to increase Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerance to acetic acid, acidic pH, and high temperature.

Authors:  Prisciluis Caheri Salas-Navarrete; Arturo Iván Montes de Oca Miranda; Alfredo Martínez; Luis Caspeta
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Characterization of Highly Ferulate-Tolerant Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 Isolates by a Rapid Reverse Engineering Method.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Emily A McIntyre; Stacy R Bedore; Ville Santala; Ellen L Neidle; Suvi Santala
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Mediator Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae To Improve Multidimensional Stress Tolerance.

Authors:  Yanli Qi; Nan Xu; Zehong Li; Jiaping Wang; Xin Meng; Cong Gao; Jian Chen; Wei Chen; Xiulai Chen; Liming Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 6.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Physiological limitations and opportunities in microbial metabolic engineering.

Authors:  José Montaño López; Lisset Duran; José L Avalos
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Establishment of genomic library technology mediated by non-homologous end joining mechanism in Yarrowia lipolytica.

Authors:  Qiuyan Bai; Shuai Cheng; Jinlai Zhang; Mengxu Li; Yingxiu Cao; Yingjin Yuan
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.038

Review 9.  Systems and Synthetic Biology Approaches to Engineer Fungi for Fine Chemical Production.

Authors:  Leonardo Martins-Santana; Luisa C Nora; Ananda Sanches-Medeiros; Gabriel L Lovate; Murilo H A Cassiano; Rafael Silva-Rocha
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-03

10.  Changes in lipid metabolism convey acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zhong-Peng Guo; Sakda Khoomrung; Jens Nielsen; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.