Literature DB >> 27815013

Mandibular reconstruction after cancer: an in-house approach to manufacturing cutting guides.

R Bosc1, B Hersant2, R Carloni2, J Niddam2, J Bouhassira2, H De Kermadec3, E Bequignon3, T Wojcik4, M Julieron4, J-P Meningaud2.   

Abstract

The restoration of mandibular bone defects after cancer can be facilitated by computer-assisted preoperative planning. The aim of this study was to assess an in-house manufacturing approach to customized cutting guides for use in the reconstruction of the mandible with osteocutaneous free flaps. A retrospective cohort study was performed, involving 18 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction with a fibula free flap at three institutions during the period July 2012 to March 2015. A single surgeon designed and manufactured fibula and mandible cutting guides using a computer-aided design process and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. The oncological outcomes, production parameters, and quality of the reconstructions performed for each patient were recorded. Computed tomography scans were acquired after surgery, and these were compared with the preoperative 3D models. Eighteen consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma underwent surgery and then reconstruction using this customized in-house surgical approach. The lengths of the fibula bone segments and the angle measurements in the simulations were similar to those of the postoperative volume rendering (P=0.61). The ease of access to 3D printing technology has enabled the computer-aided design and manufacturing of customized cutting guides for oral cancer treatment without the need for input from external laboratories.
Copyright © 2016 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer-aided design; cutting guides; fibula free flap; mandibular reconstruction; oral cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27815013     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  10 in total

1.  Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach.

Authors:  Toshiaki Numajiri; Daiki Morita; Hiroko Nakamura; Ryo Yamochi; Shoko Tsujiko; Yoshihiro Sowa
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Fibular registration using surface matching in navigation-guided osteotomies: a proof of concept study on 3D-printed models.

Authors:  Marie de Boutray; Joao Cavalcanti Santos; Adrien Bourgeade; Michael Ohayon; Pierre-Emmanuel Chammas; Renaud Garrel; Philippe Poignet; Nabil Zemiti
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Adeeb Zoabi; Idan Redenski; Daniel Oren; Adi Kasem; Asaf Zigron; Shadi Daoud; Liad Moskovich; Fares Kablan; Samer Srouji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Cost Analysis for In-house versus Industry-printed Skull Models for Acute Midfacial Fractures.

Authors:  Lyfong S Lor; Dominic A Massary; Scotty A Chung; Philip J Brown; Christopher M Runyan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-26

5.  Prebending of osteosynthesis plate using 3D printed models to treat symptomatic os acromiale and acromial fracture.

Authors:  Hanne Beliën; Hanne Biesmans; Anny Steenwerckx; Eric Bijnens; Carl Dierickx
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2017-10-24

6.  New frontiers and emerging applications of 3D printing in ENT surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  P Canzi; M Magnetto; S Marconi; P Morbini; S Mauramati; F Aprile; I Avato; F Auricchio; M Benazzo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Bacteriological and mechanical impact of the Sterrad sterilization method on personalized 3D printed guides for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Romain Bosc; Lionel Tortolano; Barbara Hersant; Moussa Oudjhani; Céline Leplay; Paul L Woerther; Paola Aguilar; Ronan Leguen; Jean-Paul Meningaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Procedure Increasing the Accuracy of Modelling and the Manufacturing of Surgical Templates with the Use of 3D Printing Techniques, Applied in Planning the Procedures of Reconstruction of the Mandible.

Authors:  Paweł Turek; Paweł Pakla; Grzegorz Budzik; Bogumił Lewandowski; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Tomasz Dziubek; Sławomir Wolski; Jan Frańczak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  In-House, Open-Source 3D-Software-Based, CAD/CAM-Planned Mandibular Reconstructions in 20 Consecutive Free Fibula Flap Cases: An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study With Three-Dimensional Performance Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Paul Kilbertus; Florian D Grill; Matthias Schwarz; Jochen Weitz; Markus Nieberler; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Andreas M Fichter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Adherence to Computer-Assisted Surgical Planning in 136 Maxillofacial Reconstructions.

Authors:  Hongyang Ma; Sohaib Shujaat; Jeroen Van Dessel; Yi Sun; Michel Bila; Jan Vranckx; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.