Literature DB >> 27814970

A kinematic algorithm to identify gait events during running at different speeds and with different footstrike types.

Joe C Handsaker1, Stephanie E Forrester2, Jonathan P Folland3, Matt I Black3, Sam J Allen4.   

Abstract

Although a number of algorithms exist for estimating ground contact events (GCEs) from kinematic data during running, they are typically only applicable to heelstrike running, or have only been evaluated at a single running speed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of four kinematics-based algorithms to estimate GCEs over a range of running speeds and footstrike types. Subjects ran over a force platform at a range of speeds; kinetic and kinematic data was captured at 1000Hz, and kinematic data was downsampled to 250Hz. A windowing process initially identified reduced time windows containing touchdown and toe-off. Algorithms based on acceleration and jerk signals of the foot markers were used to estimate touchdown (2 algorithms), toe-off (2 algorithms), and ground contact time (GCT) (4 algorithms), and compared to synchronous 'gold standard' force platform data. An algorithm utilising the vertical acceleration peak of either the heel or first metatarsal marker (whichever appeared first) for touchdown, and the vertical jerk peak of the hallux marker for toe-off, resulted in the lowest offsets (+3.1ms, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -11.8 to +18.1ms; and +2.1ms, CI: -8.1 to +12.2ms respectively). This method also resulted in the smallest offset in GCT (-1.1ms, CI: -18.6 to +16.4ms). Offsets in GCE and GCT estimates from all algorithms were typically negatively correlated to running speed, with offsets decreasing as speed increased. Assessing GCEs and GCT using this method may be useful when a force platform is unavailable or impractical.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Ground contact time; Toe-off; Touchdown

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27814970     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Running Technique is an Important Component of Running Economy and Performance.

Authors:  Jonathan P Folland; Sam J Allen; Matthew I Black; Joseph C Handsaker; Stephanie E Forrester
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Accurate Estimation of Running Temporal Parameters Using Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Mathieu Falbriard; Frédéric Meyer; Benoit Mariani; Grégoire P Millet; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Can Markerless Pose Estimation Algorithms Estimate 3D Mass Centre Positions and Velocities during Linear Sprinting Activities?

Authors:  Laurie Needham; Murray Evans; Darren P Cosker; Steffi L Colyer
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Development, evaluation and application of a novel markerless motion analysis system to understand push-start technique in elite skeleton athletes.

Authors:  Laurie Needham; Murray Evans; Darren P Cosker; Steffi L Colyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Kinematic Characteristics of Male Runners With a History of Recurrent Calf Muscle Strain Injury.

Authors:  Christopher Bramah; Stephen J Preece; Niamh Gill; Lee Herrington
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-06-01

6.  Runners Adapt Different Lower-Limb Movement Patterns With Respect to Different Speeds and Downhill Slopes.

Authors:  David Sundström; Markus Kurz; Glenn Björklund
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-06-29

7.  A 10% Increase in Step Rate Improves Running Kinematics and Clinical Outcomes in Runners With Patellofemoral Pain at 4 Weeks and 3 Months.

Authors:  Christopher Bramah; Stephen J Preece; Niamh Gill; Lee Herrington
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 6.202

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.